Compensatory Payment in Lieu of Notice: When the Employer Must Pay Despite an Apparent Refusal

Imagine: you own a small building in Cannes, and your tenant, a business executive, loses his job. He tells you he has been dismissed, but does not know exactly when his notice period begins. The employer sent him a dismissal letter on the same day it was posted, without specifying the start date of the notice. Only nine days later, the employer tells him that the notice started on the day of the letter. In the meantime, the employee refused to serve a notice period that he thought he did not owe. Result: the employer is ordered to pay the compensatory payment in lieu of notice. But what exactly does this change? This decision, handed down by the Cour de cassation on 12 November 1975, recalls an essential rule: clarity of the information given to the employee.

For a landlord in Antibes, understanding this decision can avoid costly disputes. Indeed, if your tenant finds himself in this situation, his poorly managed notice period may affect the payment of rent. Or, if you are an employer, this decision warns you: an imprecise dismissal letter exposes you to having to pay the notice period, even if the employee refused to serve it. What few people know is that the employee's refusal is not a pretext for the employer to evade his obligation to pay compensation if the information given is late or ambiguous.

This decision, although dating from 1975, remains relevant. It illustrates a fundamental principle of employment law: the employer must clearly inform the employee of the start date of the notice period. Failing that, the employee may legitimately believe that he is dispensed from it, and his refusal to serve the notice is not opposable to him. How to react? Let's first look at the precise facts of this case.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

Mr Fleury, an assistant manager in a company, is dismissed by a letter dated the same day as its posting. This letter informs him of the elimination of his position, but does not mention any start date for the notice period. The employee, not knowing when his notice begins, does not show up for work. Nine days later, the employer writes to him to specify that the notice began on the day of the first letter. Fleury then refuses to serve a notice period that he considers he has already been dispensed from performing, due to lack of clear information. The employer, considering that the employee refused the notice, does not pay him the compensatory payment corresponding to three months' salary. Fleury then brings the matter before the employment tribunal to obtain this compensation.

The judicial journey: first, the employment tribunal rules in favour of the employee. The employer appeals, but the Court of Appeal upholds the initial judgment. The employer then appeals to the Cour de cassation, arguing that the employee refused to serve the notice, which dispenses him from paying the compensation. But the Cour de cassation dismisses his appeal, holding that the trial judges had sovereignly assessed the evidence. In short, the employer did not prove that the employee had refused the notice with full knowledge of the facts, since the information on the starting point was late. Fleury could therefore legitimately think he was dispensed from the notice period.

This case, although nearly 50 years old, remains a reference for all disputes where the clarity of the information given to the employee is at issue. If you are a landlord in Cannes, you could face a similar situation with a salaried tenant: a poorly defined notice period can lead to late payment or a hasty departure. In other words, rigour in communication is essential.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Cour de cassation, in its judgment of 12 November 1975, relies on Article 1134 of the Civil Code (now Articles 1103 and 1104), which states that agreements must be performed in good faith. In employment law, the employer must inform the employee clearly and unambiguously of the conditions of the dismissal, particularly the start date of the notice period. Here, the dismissal letter contained no mention of the notice period, and it was only nine days later that the employer specified that the notice began on the day of the first letter. The trial judges considered that this late information did not prove that the employee had refused to serve the notice with full knowledge of the facts. In other words, the employee could legitimately believe he was dispensed from the notice period.

The reasoning is as follows: the employer has an obligation to set a notice period and inform the employee of it. If the information is late or ambiguous, the employee is not required to serve the notice, and the employer must pay the compensatory payment. The Cour de cassation does not challenge the sovereign assessment of the trial judges on the value of the evidence. In this case, the judges considered that the employer had not proved that the employee had refused the notice after being properly informed.

However, beware: this decision does not mean that any refusal of notice by the employee is automatically compensated. It recalls that the burden of proof lies with the employer. If the employer can show that he clearly informed the employee and that the employee refused without legitimate reason, the compensation will not be due. But in the opposite case, the compensatory payment in lieu of notice is due. What few people know is that this decision has been confirmed by consistent case law: the employer must be precise in his communications. undefined, I have come across cases where employers, thinking they were doing the right thing, sent a dismissal letter without a notice date, and found themselves ordered to pay compensation. In Antibes, a small shopkeeper thus had to pay €6,000 in compensation to his employee, for failing to specify the start date of the notice period.

What This Changes for You — Concretely

For employers: this decision imposes a duty of clarity on you. When you dismiss an employee, the dismissal letter must expressly mention the start date of the notice period. If you omit this mention, or if you give it late, you risk having to pay the compensatory payment in lieu of notice, even if the employee refuses to serve the notice. For example, in Cannes, an employer who dismisses a salesperson with a three-month notice period must indicate in the letter: "Your notice period begins on [date] and ends on [date]". Failing that, he exposes himself to an order to pay several thousand euros.

For employees: if you receive a dismissal letter without any indication of notice, or if the information is late, you may legitimately refuse to serve the notice and claim the compensatory payment. However, be careful: do not refuse systematically. It is better to ask your employer in writing to specify the start date of the notice period. If the employer does not respond or responds late, keep the evidence (letters, emails). Then, you can bring the matter before the employment tribunal to obtain the compensation. An employee in Antibes, after a redundancy dismissal, thus obtained €4,500 in compensatory payment in lieu of notice because the employer had indicated the start date only 10 days after the letter.

For landlords: this decision may indirectly concern you. If your tenant is a dismissed employee, his poorly managed notice period may affect his ability to pay the rent. Indeed, if he obtains a compensatory payment in lieu of notice, this secures his income during the notice period. On the other hand, if the dispute with his employer drags on, he might be in difficulty. You can advise your tenant to check that his employer has properly complied with the formalities. Concrete example: in Cannes, a tenant who was an executive lost his job and his employer did not specify the notice. The tenant refused to work, won his case and received €8,000 in compensation, which allowed him to pay his rent for three months.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Tip No.1: Always mention the start and end dates of the notice period in the dismissal letter. Do not just indicate the duration (e.g., "three months"). Specify: "Your notice period begins on 1 January 2025 and ends on 31 March 2025". This avoids any ambiguity.
• Tip No.2: Send the dismissal letter by registered mail with acknowledgement of receipt. This proves the date of posting and the content. If you need to specify the start date later, do so in a second letter, but ideally everything should be in the first letter.
• Tip No.3: If you are an employee, ask your employer in writing to specify the start date of the notice period as soon as you receive the letter. Keep a copy of your request. If the employer does not respond within 48 hours, consider that you are dispensed from the notice period and bring the matter before the employment tribunal.
• Tip No.4: In case of a dispute, gather all evidence of communication (letters, emails, texts). The burden of proof is on the employer, but the employee has an interest in showing that he asked for clarifications. A simple exchange of emails can make the difference.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This 1975 decision is part of consistent case law. For example, a judgment of the Cour de cassation of 10 July 2002 (No. 00-45.135) confirmed that the employer must inform the employee of the start date of the notice period in the dismissal letter, failing which the employee may refuse to serve the notice and obtain the compensatory payment. Similarly, a judgment of 17 March 2010 (No. 08-43.999) held that an employee who refuses to serve the notice after being informed late of the start date is not at fault.

The trend of the courts is therefore protective of the employee: any ambiguity benefits the employee. However, there are divergent decisions when the employee became aware of the start date by other means (e.g., orally, then confirmed in writing). In that case, the refusal may be considered abusive. For the future, one can expect the courts to require increasingly precise information, especially with the rise of electronic communications.

Summary and Next Steps

FAQ:

1. What should I do if my employer does not specify the start date of the notice period in the dismissal letter?
Ask him in writing (registered letter or email) to indicate this date within 48 hours. If he does not respond, you may legitimately consider yourself dispensed from the notice period and claim the compensatory payment.

2. Can I refuse to serve the notice if the information is given nine days later?
Yes, according to this case law, you can refuse and obtain the compensation. However, it is better to first ask for clarification to avoid unnecessary litigation.

3. Can the employer claim damages from me for refusing the notice?
No, if the information was late or incomplete. But if you were clearly informed and you refuse without reason, the employer may claim damages for the harm suffered.

4. What is the time limit to bring a claim before the employment tribunal?
You have 12 months from the termination of the employment contract to claim the compensatory payment in lieu of notice.

5. Does this decision apply to dismissals for gross misconduct?
No, because in the case of gross misconduct, notice is not due. This decision concerns dismissals for personal or economic reasons where a notice period is provided.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →