Aller au contenu principal
Eviction Compensation: Time Limit for Exercising the Right of Repentance Runs Only After Notification of the Date of Pronouncement
Droit-immobilier

Eviction Compensation: Time Limit for Exercising the Right of Repentance Runs Only After Notification of the Date of Pronouncement

📅 Décision du 13 June 2001⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 12 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that the 15-day period for exercising the right of repentance after the fixing of eviction compensation runs only from the date on which the parties became aware of the decision. The completion of the formality by which the President indicates the date of pronouncement must be expressly mentioned.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 99-18.073 • 2001-06-13 • View decision →

Imagine: you own a commercial property in Valognes, leased to a florist. The lease is nearing its end, you refuse renewal. The tenant claims eviction compensation (the sum due by the lessor who does not renew the commercial lease). The Caen Court of Appeal fixes this compensation at €50,000. You then have 15 days to change your mind and renounce the eviction by paying this sum. But if you were not informed of the exact date of pronouncement of the judgment, these 15 days have not started to run. That is precisely what the Court of Cassation ruled in this decision of 13 June 2001.

This decision, which concerns Article 32 of the Decree of 30 September 1953 (now Article L. 145-58 of the French Commercial Code), answers a practical question: from when does the period for exercising the right of repentance run? For lessor-owners, this is a crucial question: a calendar error can cost thousands of euros.

But what exactly does it change? In this article, I will tell you the story behind this decision, explain the judges' reasoning, and give you practical advice to avoid this type of dispute. Whether you are an owner in Coutances, a tenant in Valognes, or a real estate professional, this decision concerns you.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr X, owner of a commercial property in Valognes, leases it to Mr Y, a tradesman. In 1993, the lessor refuses to renew the lease. In accordance with the law, the tenant applies to the court to have the eviction compensation fixed (the sum the owner must pay if he does not renew the lease). On 23 May 1995, the Caen Court of Appeal delivers a judgment fixing this compensation at a certain sum.

The problem: the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment on 23 May, but the owner was not informed of this date. He learns of it later and then exercises his right of repentance (i.e., he finally decides to pay the compensation to keep his premises free). But the tenant contests: according to him, the 15-day period for exercising this right had already expired.

In short, did the owner still have the right to buy himself out? The Caen Court of Appeal had ruled in his favour, but the tenant appealed to the Court of Cassation. The case therefore goes up to the Court of Cassation, which must decide: from when does the 15-day period run?

What few people know: in my practice, I have come across cases where owners lost their right of repentance for acting one day too late. Here, the stakes were exactly that.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation relies on Article 32 of the Decree of 30 September 1953 (now Article L. 145-58 of the French Commercial Code). This text provides that the lessor may, within 15 days of the decision fixing the eviction compensation, renounce the eviction by paying this compensation. But the question was: do these 15 days run from the pronouncement of the decision, or only from the moment the parties become aware of it?

The judges of the Court of Cassation answer: "For the period under Article 32 of the Decree of 30 September 1953, now Article L. 145-58 of the Commercial Code, to run, the parties must have had knowledge of the date on which the decision fixing the eviction compensation is rendered." In other words, it is not the date of pronouncement that matters, but the date on which the parties learn of this decision.

However, be careful: the Court adds an additional condition. It specifies that "the completion of the formality by which the President of the court indicates to the parties the date of pronouncement of the decision must be expressly mentioned and cannot be presumed." Concretely, this means that the registry must prove that the parties were informed. If this information is not expressly mentioned in the file, the period does not run.

In this case, the Court of Appeal had found that the owner had not received notification of the date of pronouncement of the judgment of 23 May 1995. It deduced that the period had not started to run, and therefore that the right of repentance had been exercised in time. The Court of Cassation approves this reasoning and dismisses the appeal.

This decision confirms a line of case law protective of the lessor, but it is also logical: how can one comply with a time limit if one does not know when it starts?

What This Changes for You — Practically

For the lessor-owner: you can now be reassured. If you were not expressly informed of the date of the decision, you cannot be time-barred. But beware: as soon as you become aware of the decision (e.g., by notification from the opposing lawyer), the period runs. Do not delay in acting.

For the tenant-trader: this decision is less favourable to you. You cannot oppose the owner with a time limit that has not been regularly notified. If you wish the period to run, you must ensure that the decision has been brought to the lessor's attention in a certain manner.

Concrete example: in Coutances, an owner's right of repentance was contested because he had acted 20 days after the pronouncement of a judgment. But since he had not received notification of the date, the Court of Appeal validated his repentance. Without this decision of the Court of Cassation, he would have lost.

If you are in this situation, you must check two things: the date on which the decision was brought to your attention, and the existence of an express mention of this notification in the file. In case of doubt, act quickly as soon as you become aware of the decision.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Tip #1: Demand written notification of the date of pronouncement. When a judgment or order is reserved, ask the registry or your lawyer to provide you in writing with the date on which the decision will be rendered. Keep this information.
  • Tip #2: Never presume the time limit. Do not count the 15 days from the date you believe to be the pronouncement date. Wait until you have certainty, e.g., receipt of a copy of the decision or a letter from the registry.
  • Tip #3: In case of appeal, anticipate. As soon as the judgment is rendered, prepare your decision to repent or not. If you are unsure, consult a lawyer specialised in commercial law.
  • Tip #4: Have the notification recorded. If you are the tenant, and you want the period to run, ask the registry to notify the decision to the lessor by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt. Keep proof of this notification.

This decision of 13 June 2001 is part of a series of decisions protective of the lessor. For example, the Court of Cassation had already ruled, in a decision of 17 January 1984, that the period under Article 32 runs only from the service of the decision (Civ. 3e, 17 Jan. 1984, No. 82-15.693). Here, it goes further by requiring an express mention of the formality.

More recently, the Court of Cassation recalled that the right of repentance may be exercised up to the date of assignment of the leasehold interest, even after expiry of the period, if the lessor was not informed (Civ. 3e, 22 Mar. 2018, No. 17-12.471). The trend is therefore clear: judges protect the lessor against involuntary time-bar.

For the future, this case law could be reinforced by the requirements of civil procedure regarding notification. Courts will have to ensure that the mention of the date of pronouncement is systematically included in the file.

Summary and Next Steps

FAQ

What is the time limit for exercising the right of repentance after fixing eviction compensation? 15 days from the date on which the parties became aware of the decision fixing the compensation.

What if I was not informed of the date of pronouncement? The period does not run. You can exercise your repentance as soon as you become aware of the decision, even several months later.

Can the tenant contest my repentance if I exceeded the 15 days from pronouncement? Yes, but you can defend yourself by proving that you were not informed of the date. The burden of proof of notification lies with the person invoking the time limit (often the tenant).

What are the consequences if the time limit is exceeded? You definitively lose the right to retain the premises by paying the compensation. You must vacate the premises and pay the eviction compensation as fixed.

Should I consult a lawyer? Yes, as soon as you become aware of an eviction procedure. A specialised lawyer will help you comply with time limits and exercise your rights.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of procedure — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Quel est le délai pour exercer le droit de repentir après fixation de l'indemnité d'éviction ?

Le délai est de 15 jours à compter de la date à laquelle les parties ont eu connaissance de la décision fixant l'indemnité. Ce n'est pas automatiquement le jour du prononcé de la décision.

Que faire si je n'ai pas été informé de la date du prononcé de la décision ?

Le délai ne court pas. Vous pouvez exercer votre droit de repentir dès que vous avez connaissance de la décision, même plusieurs mois après. Conservez toute preuve de l'absence de notification.

Le locataire peut-il contester mon repentir si j'ai dépassé les 15 jours à compter du prononcé ?

Oui, mais vous pourrez vous défendre en prouvant que vous n'avez pas été informé de la date. La charge de la preuve de la notification incombe à celui qui invoque le délai (souvent le locataire).

Quelles sont les conséquences si le délai est dépassé ?

Vous perdez définitivement le droit de conserver le local en payant l'indemnité d'éviction. Vous devrez libérer les lieux et verser l'indemnité fixée par la décision.

Dois-je consulter un avocat pour une question d'indemnité d'éviction ?

Oui, dès que vous avez connaissance d'une procédure d'éviction. Un avocat spécialisé vous aidera à respecter les délais et à exercer vos droits. La consultation peut vous éviter des erreurs coûteuses.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 99-18.073
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 13 juin 2001

Mots-clés

indemnité d'évictiondroit de repentirbail commercialdélaiCour de cassationValognesCoutances

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Lessor-owner in Valognes: contested right of repentance

Mr X, owner of a commercial property in Valognes, refuses to renew the lease. The Court of Appeal fixes eviction compensation at €50,000. He exercises his repentance 20 days after pronouncement, but the tenant contests.

Application pratique:

Mr X can invoke the lack of notification of the date of pronouncement. If the registry did not expressly mention the information, the period did not run. He must provide proof that he was not informed. The 2001 case law protects him.

2

Tenant-trader in Coutances: time-bar of the lessor

Mrs Y, tenant in Coutances, obtains eviction compensation of €30,000. The lessor does not exercise his repentance within 15 days of pronouncement, but claims he was not informed.

Application pratique:

Mrs Y must demonstrate that the lessor was informed of the date of pronouncement, for example by a letter from the registry or a hearing notice. If she cannot prove notification, the lessor may still exercise his repentance.

3

Purchaser of a commercial property: verification of time limits

Mr Z buys a commercial property in Valognes. The previous owner was in litigation with the tenant over eviction. The compensation was fixed by a judgment not notified.

Application pratique:

Before purchasing, Mr Z must check whether the right of repentance has been exercised or not. If the period has not run, the former owner may still repent, which affects the value of the property. He must request a certificate from the registry regarding the notification.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide