Aller au contenu principal
Co-ownership: what to do if a co-owner builds on the common plot?
Droit-foncier

Co-ownership: what to do if a co-owner builds on the common plot?

📅 Décision du 12 May 2010⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 9 vues📖 7 min de lecture

A co-owner can stop unauthorised works by another co-owner and claim compensation without waiting for the partition. The Court of Cassation so reminds us in a judgment of 12 May 2010.

Leading case: cc • No. 09-65.362 • 2010-05-12 • View the decision →

Imagine: you inherit a plot of land with your two brothers and sisters in Lunel, near Montpellier. The land is held in co-ownership (shared ownership), each holding a share. One day, one of your brothers decides to build a garage on it without asking for your consent. What can you do? Wait for the partition of the co-ownership, which could take years? Or act immediately?

This is precisely the question put to the Court of Cassation in a case decided on 12 May 2010 (No. 09-65.362). The answer, clear and unambiguous: any co-owner can stop acts carried out by another co-owner that do not respect the intended use of the property or that infringe their equal rights in the co-owned thing. They can also claim damages (financial compensation) without waiting for the partition.

In other words, if a co-owner builds without agreement on the common plot, you are not obliged to suffer. You can take legal action to have the construction demolished and obtain compensation. This decision is fundamental for all co-owners, whether in Montpellier, Lunel or elsewhere in the south of France.

The facts: a story that happens every day

In this case, a plot of land was held in co-ownership between several persons. One of the co-owners, whom we shall call Mrs Z., had received a gift by notarial deed of 14 June 1966. This gift mentioned an area including part of the co-owned plot. In other words, she had received as a gift land that in reality encroached onto the common plot.

On this basis, Mrs Z. built a house on the part she believed to be hers, but which was in fact partly on the co-owned land. The other co-owners, unhappy, demanded the demolition of the structures (the building) and compensation for the damage suffered (the fact that the co-owned plot had become non-buildable because of the building).

The dispute was brought before the courts. At first instance, then on appeal, the judges had to decide: did Mrs Z. have the right to build? Could the other co-owners demand demolition without waiting for the partition? The case went up to the Court of Cassation, which delivered its judgment on 12 May 2010.

The reasoning of the court — dissected

The Court of Cassation relied on Article 815-9, paragraph 1, of the Civil Code, in its version prior to the Law of 23 June 2006. This text provides that any co-owner may use and enjoy the co-owned thing in accordance with its intended use. But it also states that a co-owner may stop the acts of another co-owner that do not respect this intended use or that infringe their equal rights.

In clear terms, each co-owner has an equal right in the property. If one of them acts as if they were the sole owner (for example by building without agreement), they violate the rights of the others. The latter can then ask the court to stop the infringement and even obtain damages (financial compensation) for the harm caused.

In this case, the Court considered that Mrs Z. had indeed erected structures on the co-owned plot, which constituted an infringement of the rights of the other co-owners. It did not matter that she had honestly believed the land belonged to her: the fact was that the building was partly on the common land. The other co-owners were therefore entitled to demand demolition and compensation.

What few people know is that this solution does not require waiting for the partition of the co-ownership. You can act immediately, as soon as the unauthorised act occurs. This is an essential protection for co-owners.

What this means for you — practically

If you are a co-owner (e.g. after an inheritance or a joint purchase), this decision gives you very concrete rights.

For the owner/landlord (co-owner): If a co-owner leases the common plot without your agreement, or builds a structure on it, you can take legal action to have the lease annulled or the demolition ordered. For example, in Montpellier, a co-owned plot leased for parking may generate a dispute if only one co-owner signs the lease. You could claim a share of the rents received and damages.

For the tenant: If you rent a co-owned property, you must check that all co-owners have agreed to the lease. Otherwise, the lease could be challenged. But rest assured: generally, the law protects the tenant in good faith.

For the buyer: Before buying a plot, make sure it is not in co-ownership with a neighbouring plot. A boundary survey (official delimitation) is essential. In Lunel, for example, a buyer discovered after the purchase that his land encroached onto the neighbour's plot: this led to lengthy litigation.

Indicative amount: If you obtain compensation for occupation without right, it may correspond to the rental value (rent) of the occupied land, multiplied by the duration of the occupation. For a 100 m² plot in Montpellier, this could amount to several thousand euros.

If you are in this situation, you should: 1) gather evidence (notarial deed, photos, bailiff's report), 2) consult a lawyer specialising in property law, 3) consider legal action without waiting for the partition.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Get a boundary survey done: Before any construction, have the exact boundaries of your land determined by a surveyor. This avoids encroachments onto neighbouring or co-owned plots. Cost: around €1,500 for a standard plot in Montpellier.
  • Obtain written agreement from all co-owners: If you want to build on a co-owned plot, have all co-owners sign an authorisation. Better still: use a notarial deed to formalise the agreement.
  • Prefer a co-ownership agreement: Sign an agreement that organises the management of the co-owned property: who can do what, how the fruits (rents, crops) are distributed, etc. This avoids conflicts.
  • Act quickly in case of a dispute: As soon as you notice an unauthorised act, send a formal notice (registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt) to stop the works. If nothing is done, apply to the interim relief judge (urgent procedure) to obtain a quick decision.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

This decision is part of consistent case law. For example, the Court of Cassation had already ruled in 2004 (Civ. 1ère, 16 November 2004, No. 02-18.049) that a co-owner who builds without agreement on the common plot must demolish and compensate. The Law of 23 June 2006 then strengthened the rights of co-owners by providing that any administrative or disposal act requires unanimity (except for preservatory acts).

Trend: courts are increasingly strict towards co-owners who act alone. They consider that co-ownership is a temporary co-ownership that requires respect for everyone's rights. In the future, it is likely that judges will continue to protect co-owners against abuses.

What this means: if you are in a co-ownership, you have strong rights. But you must also exercise them promptly, because case law requires a reaction within a reasonable time.

Summary and next steps

FAQ:

  1. Can I build on a co-owned plot without the agreement of the others? No, it is prohibited. You risk demolition and damages.
  2. What to do if a co-owner builds without my agreement? Send a formal notice, then apply to the interim relief judge. You can claim demolition and compensation.
  3. Do I have to wait for the partition to act? No, you can act immediately, as this judgment reminds us.
  4. What are the time limits to act? In matters of encroachment, the action is in principle imprescriptible (no time limit). But to claim damages, you have 5 years from the date you became aware of the harm.
  5. How much does a procedure cost? Count €2,000 to €5,000 in lawyer's fees, depending on complexity. Surveyor and bailiff costs are extra.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
servitude-droit-passage-avocat/" rel="dofollow">→ Avocat servitudes & foncier  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je construire sur un terrain indivis sans l'accord des autres indivisaires ?

Non, c'est interdit. Tout indivisaire doit respecter les droits égaux des autres. Si vous construisez sans accord, vous risquez une action en justice pour faire démolir votre construction et payer des dommages-intérêts.

Que faire si un co-indivisaire construit sans mon accord ?

Vous devez agir rapidement : envoyez une mise en demeure (lettre recommandée avec AR) pour demander l'arrêt des travaux. Ensuite, saisissez le juge en référé (procédure d'urgence) pour obtenir la démolition et une indemnité. Vous n'avez pas besoin d'attendre le partage de l'indivision.

Quels sont les délais pour agir contre un empiètement en indivision ?

L'action en démolition pour empiètement est imprescriptible : vous pouvez agir à tout moment. En revanche, pour réclamer des dommages-intérêts, vous avez 5 ans à compter du jour où vous avez eu connaissance du préjudice.

Combien coûte une procédure pour empiètement en indivision ?

Les honoraires d'avocat varient entre 2 000 et 5 000 € selon la complexité. Il faut ajouter les frais de géomètre-expert (environ 1 500 €) et d'huissier. Une consultation préalable permet d'évaluer le coût exact.

Puis-je louer un bien en indivision sans l'accord de tous ?

Non, le bail est un acte d'administration qui nécessite l'accord de tous les indivisaires. Si vous louez seul, le bail peut être annulé et vous devrez indemniser les autres indivisaires.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 09-65.362
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 12 mai 2010

Mots-clés

indivisionconstruction sans accordempiètementparcelle communedémolitiondommages-intérêtsMontpellierLunel

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Co-owner: construction without agreement

You are the owner of a plot held in co-ownership with your sister in Lunel. She builds a swimming pool on it without your agreement. You want to have it demolished.

Application pratique:

This judgment allows you to act immediately. You can apply to the interim relief judge to obtain the demolition of the swimming pool and damages corresponding to the loss of enjoyment of the land. Contact a lawyer to gather evidence (notarial deed, photos, bailiff's report) and start proceedings.

2

Buyer: undisclosed encroachment

You buy a house in Montpellier. After the sale, you discover that the garage encroaches onto the neighbour's plot, which is held in co-ownership with a third party.

Application pratique:

You can ask the seller for a price reduction or damages for latent defect. But you must also regularise the situation with the neighbour: either buy the plot or seek an easement. The case law protects you if you are in good faith, but it is better to prevent by a boundary survey before purchase.

3

Tenant: lease challenged by a co-owner

You rent a flat in Montpellier. One of the owners (co-owner) did not sign the lease. They ask you to leave.

Application pratique:

As a tenant in good faith, you are protected. The lease remains valid against you if you were unaware of the lack of agreement. However, the aggrieved owner can take action against their co-owner to obtain a share of the rents. You will not be evicted, but the lease could be terminated at its term. Consult a lawyer to check your situation.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide