Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

The right of an employer to

📅 Décision du 26 October 2011⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The right of an employer to enter into successive fixed-term contracts with the same employee in order to fill a seasonal position is not subject to any limit beyond which an overall permanent employment relationship would be established between the parties. The court of appeal, having found that the position held for sixteen years during the period from mid-July to mid-September by the employee as a seasonal worker for the packaging of sweetcorn corresponded to tasks that were to be repeated each year at more or less fixed dates depending on the maturity of the seasonal product, and that these tasks were related to that cyclical increase, correctly held that the position was seasonal and thus justified the rejection of the claim for reclassification as a permanent contract.

Reference decision: cc • N° 09-43.205 • 2011-10-26 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The right of an employer to enter into successive fixed-term contracts with the same employee in order to fill a seasonal position is not subject to any limit beyond which an overall permanent employment relationship would be established between the parties. The court of appeal, having found that the position held for sixteen years during the period from mid-July to mid-September by the employee as a seasonal worker for the packaging of sweetcorn corresponded to tasks that were to be repeated each year at more or less fixed dates depending on the maturity of the seasonal product, and that these tasks were related to that cyclical increase, correctly held that the position was seasonal and thus justified the rejection of the claim for reclassification as a permanent contract.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing an action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 09-43.205
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 26 octobre 2011

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide