Legacies between Cohabitees and Surviving Spouse: The Court of Cassation Rules
Droit-immobilier

Legacies between Cohabitees and Surviving Spouse: The Court of Cassation Rules

📅 Décision du 26 October 2011⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 7 min de lecture

A legacy made to a cohabitee before marriage remains subject to the old rules of Article 1094-1 of the Civil Code, limiting the usufruct of the surviving spouse in favour of the children. The Court of Cassation clarifies the date for assessing rights.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 10-20.217 • 26 October 2011 • View the decision →

Picture the scene: in Rive-de-Gier, a man writes a will in favour of his partner, whom he has not yet married. He bequeaths the usufruct (the right to use property and receive its income without owning it) of all his assets to the woman who shares his life. Then he marries her a few years later. On his death, what happens? Can his widow benefit from the full usufruct, or can the children from a first marriage reduce her rights?

This seemingly simple question divided the judges in Saint-Étienne until the Court of Cassation settled it in 2011. For homeowners and blended families in Andrézieux-Bouthéon and elsewhere, the stakes are high: how much will your spouse inherit if you made a legacy before marriage?

The answer lies in a rule of timing: it is the date of the legacy that counts, not the date of death. If the will was made before marriage, the old rules (prior to the 2006 reform) apply, limiting the surviving spouse's rights to one-third of the usufruct in the presence of children. An analysis of a decision that changes the outlook for thousands of families.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

Mr X, a homeowner in Rive-de-Gier, was cohabiting with Ms Y. He had two children, Elodie and Jessica, from a previous union. In 1998, he wrote a holographic will (handwritten) by which he bequeathed to Ms Y "the full usufruct of all my property." At that time, Ms Y was only his cohabitee; the marriage would take place later, in 2002.

Mr X died in 2007. When the estate was opened, two sides opposed each other: Ms Y, now widow, claimed the full usufruct in accordance with the will. The two daughters, Elodie and Jessica, argued that their stepmother could only claim one-third of the usufruct, under Article 1094-1 of the Civil Code in its version prior to the Act of 23 June 2006 (known as the "succession reform"). Why? Because the legacy was made before the marriage, and the rules applicable to gifts between spouses (gifts between husband and wife) do not apply to a legacy made to a cohabitee who later becomes a spouse.

The Tribunal de Grande Instance of Saint-Étienne ruled in favour of the children: the usufruct was reduced to one-third. Ms Y appealed. The Lyon Court of Appeal confirmed in 2010. Ms Y appealed to the Court of Cassation. The case went up to the Court of Cassation, which had to rule on a novel legal question: at what date is the status of spouse assessed for the application of the protective rules for the surviving spouse?

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation dismissed Ms Y's appeal. Its reasoning is simple but relentless: gifts between spouses (Article 1094-1 of the Civil Code) only apply to legacies made to a person who is already the testator's spouse at the time of the will. If the legacy is made to a cohabitee, even if she becomes a spouse later, the general law rules on gifts apply.

In this case, the will of 1998 was written while Ms Y was a cohabitee. At that date, the applicable rules were those of the old Article 1094-1, which limited the surviving spouse's rights to one-quarter in full ownership or one-third in usufruct when the deceased left children. The 2006 reform improved the spouse's rights (full usufruct possible), but it can only apply to legacies made after its entry into force (1 January 2007) or to estates opened after that date, provided the legacy was made in the capacity of a spouse.

The judges specify that "the benefit of such a gift cannot vest in the beneficiary before the testator's death": in other words, the legacy only takes effect on death, but its validity and legal regime are fixed on the day it was made. This is an application of the principle of non-retroactivity of laws (Article 2 of the Civil Code).

The decision confirms settled case law: the status of the heir is assessed on the date of the will, not on the date of death. No reversal here, but a useful clarification.

What This Means for You — Practically

If you are a homeowner in Andrézieux-Bouthéon and you made a legacy to your partner before marriage, know that this legacy will be subject to the rules in force at the date of the will, not the more favourable current rules. Specifically, if you have children, your spouse will not be able to benefit from the full usufruct: it will be limited to one-third in usufruct (or one-quarter in full ownership).

Let's take a numerical example: you own a house valued at €300,000. If you leave the full usufruct to your spouse, with children, under the old rules, they will only receive one-third of the usufruct, i.e., the enjoyment of a value of €100,000. The children get the remainder as bare ownership (ownership without enjoyment). If you had waited until you were married to make the legacy, your spouse could have obtained the full usufruct (€300,000). The difference is enormous.

For tenants, this decision has less direct impact, but if you are an heir of a parent who made a legacy to their new spouse, you can challenge the extent of that spouse's rights if the legacy predates the marriage. In practice, notaries in the Loire department now systematically check the date of the will against the date of marriage.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Make a new will after marriage: If you made a legacy before marrying, redo it after marriage to benefit from the more favourable rules. A simple codicil (addition to the will) dated and signed is sufficient.
  • Consult a notary before marrying: When drafting the marriage contract or will, seek advice on the impact of the legacy date on the spouse's rights.
  • Inform your children of your wishes: To avoid disputes, discuss your succession choices with them. A family agreement can prevent years of litigation.
  • Check the dates in the certificate of inheritance: When the estate is opened, the notary draws up a certificate of inheritance. Make sure it mentions the exact date of the will and marriage to avoid any error.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This decision is part of a line of cases strictly applying the principle of non-retroactivity. One can cite a judgment of the Court of Cassation of 10 March 2010 (No. 09-10.246) which held that the revocation of a legacy by a subsequent marriage (Article 1038 of the Civil Code) does not apply if the legacy was made before marriage without an automatic revocation clause. The courts' trend is therefore clear: the date of the will is decisive, and reforms only apply to later acts.

Since 2006, the rights of the surviving spouse have been strengthened (full usufruct possible, life right of occupancy in the family home). But this 2011 decision reminds us that these improvements do not automatically benefit everyone: they depend on the date of the legacy and the status of the heir at the time it was made. In the future, notaries will likely advise systematically updating wills after marriage.

What You Absolutely Must Remember

Practical FAQ:

  • Q: My partner made a will in my favour before our marriage. What will happen on their death?
    A: Your legacy will be subject to the rules in force at the date of the will. If you have children, you will not be able to obtain the full usufruct but only one-third (or one-quarter in full ownership).
  • Q: Can I redo the will after marriage to improve my spouse's rights?
    A: Yes, absolutely. A new will made after marriage, even repeating the same terms, will be considered a legacy between spouses and benefit from the current more favourable rules.
  • Q: Doesn't the 2006 reform apply to all estates opened after 2007?
    A: Yes, for estates opened after 1 January 2007, the new rules apply. But the content of the will is fixed on the day it was made. If the legacy was made before marriage, it remains subject to the old rules.
  • Q: What should I do if I am a child from a first marriage and my father left the full usufruct to his new wife?
    A: Check the date of the will. If it predates the marriage, you can challenge the full usufruct and ask for it to be reduced to one-third. Consult a lawyer specialising in succession law.
  • Q: Does this decision also apply to gifts?
    A: No, it specifically concerns legacies (wills). For inter vivos gifts, the rules are different. But the general principle remains that the date of the deed determines the applicable regime.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Mon conjoint a fait un testament avant notre mariage en ma faveur. Que va-t-il se passer à son décès ?

Votre legs sera soumis aux règles en vigueur à la date du testament. Si vous avez des enfants, vous ne pourrez pas obtenir l'usufruit total mais seulement un tiers (ou un quart en pleine propriété).

Puis-je refaire un testament après le mariage pour améliorer les droits de mon conjoint ?

Oui, absolument. Un nouveau testament rédigé après le mariage, même reprenant les mêmes termes, sera considéré comme un legs entre époux et bénéficiera des règles actuelles plus favorables.

La réforme de 2006 ne s'applique-t-elle pas à toutes les successions ouvertes après 2007 ?

Si, pour les successions ouvertes après le 1er janvier 2007, les nouvelles règles s'appliquent. Mais le contenu du testament est figé au jour où il a été fait. Si le legs a été consenti avant le mariage, il reste soumis aux anciennes règles.

Que faire si je suis enfant d'un premier lit et que mon père a légué tout l'usufruit à sa nouvelle épouse ?

Vérifiez la date du testament. S'il est antérieur au mariage, vous pouvez contester l'usufruit total et demander qu'il soit réduit à un tiers. Consultez un avocat spécialisé en droit successoral.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle aussi aux donations ?

Non, elle concerne spécifiquement les legs (testaments). Pour les donations entre vifs, les règles sont différentes. Mais le principe général reste que la date de l'acte détermine le régime applicable.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 10-20.217
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 26 octobre 2011

Mots-clés

legsconcubinconjoint survivantusufruitsuccession

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Homeowner in Rive-de-Gier: Legacy Before Marriage

Mr Dupont, 65, owner of a house in Rive-de-Gier, bequeathed the usufruct to his partner in 2005. He married in 2008. On his death, his widow and his two children oppose each other.

Application pratique:

The widow will only be entitled to one-third of the usufruct. To avoid this, Mr Dupont should have re-made his will after marriage. As it stands, the children can demand the reduction.

2

Child from a First Marriage in Andrézieux-Bouthéon

Jessica, heir of her father who died in 2010, discovers that her father had bequeathed the full usufruct to his stepmother, married in 2003. The legacy dated from 2001.

Application pratique:

Jessica can challenge: since the legacy predates the marriage, the usufruct must be reduced to one-third. She must act quickly (5-year limitation period from the date of death).

3

Notary: Advising a Client Getting Married

A notary in Saint-Étienne receives a couple who are getting married. The man has a will in favour of his future wife, made in 2010.

Application pratique:

The notary should advise re-making the will after marriage so that the protective rules for the surviving spouse (full usufruct possible) apply. Otherwise, the legacy will remain subject to the less favourable 2010 rules.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide