The Nominative Enumeration of

Application pratique:

This case law confirms that a single list at the beginning suffices under Article 17 of the 1967 Decree. Marie's challenge will be rejected. She must focus on substantive grounds, like improper notice or voting irregularities, within the two-month appeal deadline from notification.

Application pratique:

The ruling makes clear that repeating the list is unnecessary. Jacques can list all co-owners, their presence status, and shares once at the start of the minutes. This saves time and reduces errors. He should ensure the initial list is complete and accurate, as it serves for the entire meeting.

Application pratique:

The 1978 decision confirms this is legally sound. Amélie cannot contest the validity on this ground alone. She should check if the resolution was properly adopted (majorities) and if she was duly informed as the new owner. If she still objects, she must act within two months of learning of the decision.