Droit Immobilier

The trial judges who find that the

📅 Décision du 08 February 1979⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The trial judges who find that the perforations and chases made in a wall, as well as the installation of an ineffective shoring system, were the real cause of the collapse of a wall which injured a worker, and that the employer, who had given the team leader whom he had delegated to supervise the workers no instructions as to the precautions to be taken before making a further chase, nor had he made any remark when he came to the site after it had been made, may deduce from these findings that the team leader's error and the employer's failure constituted faults of exceptional gravity.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 77-13.084 • 1979-02-08 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The trial judges who find that the perforations and chases made in a wall, as well as the installation of an ineffective shoring system, were the real cause of the collapse of a wall which injured a worker, and that the employer, who had given the team leader whom he had delegated to supervise the workers no instructions as to the precautions to be taken before making a further chase, nor had he made any remark when he came to the site after it had been made, may deduce from these findings that the team leader's error and the employer's failure constituted faults of exceptional gravity.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeal
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, letters)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 77-13.084
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 08 février 1979

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide