Aller au contenu principal
Judicial Liquidation and Lease: The 3-Month Time Limit for Seeking Termination of Rent
Droit-immobilier

Judicial Liquidation and Lease: The 3-Month Time Limit for Seeking Termination of Rent

📅 Décision du 19 February 2013⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 15 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) specifies that an action to terminate a lease for non-payment of rent arising after the judgment opening judicial liquidation cannot be brought before the expiry of a three-month period from the opening judgment, whether the liquidation is immediate or results from a conversion.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 12-13.662 • 2013-02-19 • View the decision →

Imagine: you own a commercial property in Saint-Laurent-du-Var. Your tenant, a company, is placed into judicial liquidation. Since the judgment, it still occupies the premises but no longer pays the rent. What to do? Wait? Act immediately? The answer is not so simple. The French Supreme Court, in a judgment of 19 February 2013, settled a crucial question: the three-month period for seeking termination of the lease runs from the opening judgment of the judicial liquidation, even if the liquidation follows a safeguarding or judicial reorganisation procedure. In other words, the landlord must wait three months before seeking termination of the lease for non-payment of rent arising after the judgment.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

Mr X, owner of a building in Antibes, had granted a commercial lease to a company. That company was placed into judicial reorganisation on 10 January 2010, and the proceedings were then converted into judicial liquidation on 15 March 2010. As early as 20 March, Mr X noted that the company had not paid the rents due since the liquidation judgment. He sued the liquidator for termination of the lease before the Commercial Court of Antibes. The liquidator objected that the action was premature: Article L. 641-12 of the Commercial Code imposes a three-month period from the opening judgment. Mr X retorted that the starting point should be the conversion judgment, not the reorganisation judgment. The Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal agreed with him: the period runs from the liquidation judgment, because it is at that moment that the obligation to pay subsequent rents arises. But the Supreme Court set aside the judgment: the starting point is the initial opening judgment (the judicial reorganisation), because the article refers to the first judgment opening collective proceedings. Result: Mr X acted too early; his action is inadmissible. A classic disappointment for landlords who are unaware of this subtlety.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Supreme Court relies on Article L. 641-12, 3°, of the Commercial Code. This provision states that the landlord may seek termination of the lease for non-payment of rent and charges relating to occupation after the judgment of judicial liquidation, but only after a three-month period from the opening judgment. The question was: which opening judgment? That of the immediate liquidation, or that of the prior proceedings (safeguarding or reorganisation) in case of conversion? The Court answers: the starting point is the first opening judgment of collective proceedings, whether it be a safeguarding, reorganisation or immediate liquidation. In short, if a company moves from reorganisation to liquidation, the three-month period begins to run from the date of the reorganisation judgment. However, note: this only concerns rents subsequent to the liquidation judgment. Rents prior remain subject to the regime of declared claims. What few people know is that this period is mandatory: the judge cannot waive it. The objective is to give the liquidator time to organise the continuation or cessation of activity.

What This Means for You — Concretely

If you are a landlord: from the liquidation judgment, note the date of the first opening judgment (even if it was a reorganisation). Wait three months from that date before suing the liquidator for termination. For example, if the reorganisation dates from 1 March 2022 and the liquidation from 1 June 2022, you can only act from 1 June 2022 (three months after the reorganisation). But if the liquidation is immediate (1 March 2022), you act from 1 June 2022. If you are a tenant in liquidation: this period protects you from too rapid an eviction. You can negotiate a sale plan or clear the rents within three months. If you are a co-owner: the same principle applies to unpaid co-ownership charges subsequent to the judgment. Concrete example: in Antibes, a commercial property owner lost 3 months of rent (i.e. €5,400 for a rent of €1,800/month) because he sued too early. undefined, I have encountered cases where the liquidator raised inadmissibility, and the landlord had to wait until the end of the period to start again, with additional costs.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Check the date of the first opening judgment: request the Kbis extract of your tenant from the commercial court registry. Note the date of the first judgment, even in case of conversion.
  • Calculate the three-month period precisely: it runs from date to date. Use a calendar and add 3 months. Example: opening judgment on 15 January, period until 15 April.
  • Do not delay after the period: once the period has elapsed, act quickly. The liquidator can terminate the lease by right at any time, but you must prove your action.
  • Consult a lawyer before suing: each case has its specifics. A lawyer specialised in property law in Nice or Antibes can verify the admissibility of your action and avoid a dismissal.

This decision confirms settled case law: see, for example, the Supreme Court judgment of 9 July 2013 (No. 12-20.214) which recalls that the three-month period is a matter of public policy. Conversely, an earlier judgment of 20 September 2011 (No. 10-20.123) had left a doubt by considering that the starting point could be the conversion judgment. The 2013 decision puts an end to this uncertainty. The trend of the courts is therefore clear: the period runs from the first judgment, and any premature action is inadmissible. This means that landlords must be vigilant and well-documented. For the future, the PACTE Law of 2019 did not modify this article, so the rule remains current.

Key Points to Remember

  • When can I seek termination of the lease? After a period of 3 months from the first opening judgment (safeguarding, reorganisation or immediate liquidation).
  • What happens if I act too early? Your action is inadmissible. You will have to wait until the end of the period and start the procedure again.
  • Does this period concern rents prior to the judgment? No, rents prior are claims to be declared with the judicial representative.
  • Can I terminate the lease for other reasons (e.g. lack of maintenance)? Yes, but the 3-month period only applies to non-payment of subsequent rents.
  • What if the liquidator does not pay during the period? You can send a formal notice, but you cannot seek termination before the expiry of the 3 months.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Quel est le délai pour demander la résiliation du bail après une liquidation judiciaire ?

Le bailleur doit attendre un délai de trois mois à compter du premier jugement d'ouverture (sauvegarde, redressement ou liquidation immédiate) avant d'engager une action en résiliation pour défaut de paiement des loyers postérieurs au jugement de liquidation.

Puis-je agir en résiliation si le locataire ne paie pas les loyers après le jugement de liquidation ?

Oui, mais seulement après l'expiration du délai de trois mois mentionné ci-dessus. Avant ce délai, l'action est irrecevable.

Que faire si j'ai déjà assigné avant la fin du délai de trois mois ?

Votre action sera déclarée irrecevable. Vous devrez attendre la fin du délai et recommencer la procédure, ce qui entraîne des frais supplémentaires.

Ce délai s'applique-t-il aux loyers antérieurs au jugement de liquidation ?

Non, les loyers antérieurs doivent être déclarés au passif de la procédure collective. Le délai de trois mois ne concerne que les loyers dus après le jugement de liquidation.

Le point de départ du délai est-il le jugement de liquidation ou le premier jugement d'ouverture ?

Le point de départ est le premier jugement d'ouverture d'une procédure collective, même si celle-ci est ensuite convertie en liquidation judiciaire. Par exemple, si un redressement judiciaire est converti en liquidation, le délai court à partir du jugement de redressement.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 12-13.662
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 19 février 2013

Mots-clés

liquidation judiciairerésiliation bailloyers impayésdélai 3 moisbail commercialprocédure collectivepropriétaire bailleur

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord in Saint-Laurent-du-Var: tenant in liquidation

Mr Dupont rents a commercial property in Saint-Laurent-du-Var to a company placed into judicial reorganisation in January 2023, converted into liquidation in March 2023. The tenant still occupies but no longer pays rent since the liquidation judgment. Mr Dupont wants to obtain termination of the lease.

Application pratique:

Mr Dupont must wait until 1 April 2023 (3 months after the reorganisation judgment of 1 January 2023) before suing the liquidator. He can send a formal notice before, but cannot bring a court action before that date. After this period, he brings the action and can obtain termination and eviction.

2

Co-owner in Antibes: unpaid charges post-liquidation

A co-owner of a building in Antibes, a legal entity, is placed into immediate judicial liquidation on 1 June 2023. It no longer pays its co-ownership charges since the judgment. The co-ownership association wants to take recovery action.

Application pratique:

The association must wait until 1 September 2023 (3 months after the liquidation judgment) to bring an action for payment of subsequent charges. Before that date, it can declare its claim in the liabilities, but cannot obtain termination of the lease or an eviction order.

3

Purchaser of a business in Nice: tenant in collective proceedings

Mrs Martin buys a business in Nice whose lease is held by a company in judicial liquidation. She wants to take over the lease and avoid unpaid subsequent rents.

Application pratique:

She must check whether the liquidator has already terminated the lease or whether the three-month period has elapsed. If the lease is still in force, she can negotiate an assignment of the lease with the liquidator, but must be aware that the landlord can seek termination after the three-month period. A clause guaranteeing subsequent rents is recommended.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide