Where, in the absence of a written agreement or
Droit-immobilier

Where, in the absence of a written agreement or

📅 Décision du 01 July 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Where, in the absence of a written agreement or where the agreement is silent, the parties to a public road haulage contract have not stipulated a notice period for termination, that period is fixed by a standard-form contract approved by decree issued pursuant to Article L. 1432-4 of the Transport Code. The provisions of Article L. 442-6, I, 5°, now Article L. 442-1, II, of the Commercial Code do not then apply. The same applies where the written agreement expressly refers to the clause of the standard-form contract fixing such a period. Where the parties have concluded a written contract stipulating the notice period for termination, the provisions of Article L. 442-1, II, of the Commercial Code are applicable. In such a case, the party terminating the contract who has granted its partner a notice period at least equal to that provided for in the standard-form contract in force at the date of notification of termination cannot incur liability under that provision.

Reference decision : cc • No. 24-19.356 • 2026-07-01

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Where, in the absence of a written agreement or where the agreement is silent, the parties to a public road haulage contract have not stipulated a notice period for termination, that period is fixed by a standard-form contract approved by decree issued pursuant to Article L. 1432-4 of the Transport Code. The provisions of Article L. 442-6, I, 5°, now Article L. 442-1, II, of the Commercial Code do not then apply. The same applies where the written agreement expressly refers to the clause of the standard-form contract fixing such a period. Where the parties have concluded a written contract stipulating the notice period for termination, the provisions of Article L. 442-1, II, of the Commercial Code are applicable. In such a case, the party terminating the contract who has granted its partner a notice period at least equal to that provided for in the standard-form contract in force at the date of notification of termination cannot incur liability under that provision.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 24-19.356
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 01 juillet 2026

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord's notice period for terminating a commercial lease

A landlord in Lyon wishes to terminate a commercial lease with a restaurant tenant. The lease is silent on notice period. The landlord gives 3 months' notice, but the tenant claims it should be 6 months under the Commercial Code.

Application pratique:

According to the case law, if the lease does not specify a notice period, the period from the standard-form contract approved by decree applies, not the Commercial Code. The landlord should check the applicable standard-form contract for road haulage? Actually, this case is about transport contracts, but the principle extends to commercial leases? No, the article is about transport. So for a commercial lease, the Commercial Code applies if the lease is written. Here, the lease is silent, so the standard-form contract for commercial leases? Actually, the decision concerns transport, but the key point is that if the contract is silent, the standard-form contract applies. For commercial leases, there is no such standard-form contract; thus the Commercial Code would apply. The landlord should verify the lease and applicable regulations.

2

First-time buyer discovers undisclosed structural defect

A first-time buyer in Marseille purchases a flat for €250,000. Six months later, they find a major crack in the load-bearing wall due to poor construction. The seller claims no knowledge.

Application pratique:

The buyer must act quickly: the legal time limit for an action for hidden defects is two years from discovery. They should immediately gather all documents (survey report, photos, correspondence) and consult a lawyer. Preventive advice would have been to obtain a technical inspection before purchase.

3

Co-owner in dispute over unpaid charges

In a Paris co-ownership, one owner has not paid common charges for 18 months, accumulating €4,500. The syndic wants to sue, but other co-owners are hesitant about legal costs.

Application pratique:

The syndic must follow the legal procedure: send a formal notice, then obtain a court order. The co-ownership can recover the debt plus interest. The key is to keep all records of notices and payments. Anticipating by including a penalty clause in the co-ownership rules can prevent such issues.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide