Aller au contenu principal
Droit Foncier

Does not give a legal basis to its

📅 Décision du 23 March 1981⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The court which allows the objection made by a developer to the notice to pay the land registration tax from which he had been exempted subject to the construction of a non-residential building within a period of four years, and states that the project could not be carried out as a result of the refusal of planning permission for the planned large retail store, a direct consequence of the enactment of the Law of 27 December 1973 on the orientation of commerce and crafts, which had modified and restricted the conditions for obtaining the said permission, without seeking to ascertain whether the person concerned could not, by requesting the issue of a town planning certificate, even though its production was not mandatory, have known the difficulties he would encounter and whether the refusal of planning permission was not foreseeable from the outset of the operation, does not provide a legal basis for its decision.

Reference decision: cc • N° 79-15.785 • 1981-03-23 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The court which allows the objection made by a developer to the notice to pay the land registration tax from which he had been exempted subject to the construction of a non-residential building within a period of four years, and states that the project could not be carried out as a result of the refusal of planning permission for the planned large retail store, a direct consequence of the enactment of the Law of 27 December 1973 on the orientation of commerce and crafts, which had modified and restricted the conditions for obtaining the said permission, without seeking to ascertain whether the person concerned could not, by requesting the issue of a town planning certificate, even though its production was not mandatory, have known the difficulties he would encounter and whether the refusal of planning permission was not foreseeable from the outset of the operation, does not provide a legal basis for its decision.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appealing
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, letters)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: a 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 79-15.785
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 23 mars 1981

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide