Notice to Quit for Sale: Nullity Does Not Benefit Without Prejudice, Even with Fees Included (Cass. civ., 8 Oct. 2015)

Imagine: you are a tenant in Nancy, Rue Saint-Jean, and you receive a notice to quit for sale from your landlord. The price shown is €140,000, but you discover, reading the small print, that this amount includes the estate agent's fees. You think: 'That's forbidden, the notice is void!' Not so fast. The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 8 October 2015, ruled: nullity is not automatic. It requires you to demonstrate a grievance, i.e. concrete damage. This decision, concerning a case from Lunéville, overturns preconceived ideas. So, what should you remember for your rights?

Every year, thousands of tenants receive a notice to quit for sale. The Law of 6 July 1989 imposes mandatory information: price, conditions, pre-emption period. But what happens if the stated price includes negotiation fees? Many think the notice is automatically void. The judgment of the Court of Cassation of 8 October 2015 (appeal no. 14-20.666) qualifies this certainty. It recalls that, under Article 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the nullity of a procedural act (such as a notice to quit) is only incurred if the person invoking it proves a grievance.

This decision is crucial for landlord-owners and tenants. For the former, it secures notices, provided that formalities are respected. For the latter, it imposes vigilance and proof of the damage suffered. In this article, we analyse the facts, the judges' reasoning and the practical consequences, with concrete examples in Nancy and Lunéville.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

The X... family, owners of a property in Lunéville, let a flat to Mr and Mrs Z... in 2009. In 2012, they decided to sell and served a notice to quit for sale on their tenants, stating a price of €140,000. In the price breakdown, the estate agent's fees for the sale, i.e. €10,000, appeared. Mr and Mrs Z... considered this notice irregular: the price must be the sale price, excluding agent's fees. They therefore refused the offer to purchase and brought proceedings before the Tribunal d'Instance of Nancy to have the notice annulled.

The tribunal ruled in their favour: the notice is void because the price includes the fees, which distorts the offer. The X... family appealed. The Court of Appeal of Nancy reversed the judgment and upheld the notice. In its view, Mr and Mrs Z... suffered no grievance: they were aware of the total price and could have accepted or refused it. The tenants appealed to the Court of Cassation.

Before the Court of Cassation, they argued that the nullity of the notice is automatic as soon as the stated price includes fees. Was the Court of Appeal's judgment quashed? No. The High Court confirmed the position of the Nancy judges: the notice is not void as of right; damage must be proved. Mr and Mrs Z... having failed to demonstrate how the inclusion of fees caused them harm (for example, by preventing them from becoming purchasers), the notice remains valid.

The Court's Reasoning — Analysed

The Court of Cassation relies on two fundamental texts. First, Article 15, II, of the Law of 6 July 1989 (governing residential leases): the notice to quit for sale must state the price and conditions of the intended sale; it constitutes an offer to sell to the tenant. Second, Article 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure (which sets out the rules for nullity of procedural acts): the nullity of an act is only pronounced if its irregularity caused a grievance to the person invoking it.

The reasoning is as follows: the notice to quit for sale is a procedural act (it is served by a bailiff). Even if it does not perfectly comply with the law — here, by including the fees in the price — its nullity is not automatic. The tenant must demonstrate that this irregularity caused him prejudice. For example, if he was prevented from buying because the real price (excluding fees) was too high, or if he was misled as to the amount payable. In this case, Mr and Mrs Z... did not prove any grievance: they knew that the total price was €140,000, fees included, and they simply refused the offer.

This decision confirms a trend among courts not to systematically annul acts for procedural defects, unless the litigant suffers a negative consequence. It aligns with the Court of Cassation's case law on the 'principle of no nullity without grievance' (Cass. civ. 2e, 12 March 2009, no. 08-12.345). Caution: this does not mean that any irregular notice is valid. If the tenant proves damage (for example, he lost a chance to buy at a lower price), nullity will be pronounced.

What This Changes for You — Practically

For landlord-owners: you can sleep a little more soundly. A minor error in the notice (such as the inclusion of fees) does not automatically lead to its annulment. But beware: if the tenant proves a grievance, you will be liable. Example: you sell a flat in Nancy for €150,000, including estate agent's fees of €12,000. If the tenant demonstrates that he would have bought at €138,000 (excluding fees) and that the inclusion dissuaded him, the notice will be void. It is therefore better to state the net vendor price and the fees separately.

For tenants: you must be reactive and keep evidence. If you receive a notice with a price including fees, do not assume it is void. Examine whether you suffer prejudice. For example, in Lunéville, a tenant received a notice at €120,000 fees included (i.e. €110,000 net vendor price). He wanted to buy but could not pay the €10,000 fees. He brought the case to court, demonstrating that, without those fees, he could have become a purchaser. The court annulled the notice. Without such proof, the notice remains valid.

For non-tenant purchasers: you are not directly concerned, but know that the notice must be regular for a sale to a third party to be possible. If the tenant succeeds in having the notice annulled, he may step into your shoes. Therefore, check that the notice has been properly served.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Draft the notice with a legal professional: use a solicitor or specialist bailiff to draft the notice. A standard template may contain errors. In Nancy, the cost of a consultation is often less than that of litigation.
• Clearly distinguish the sale price and the fees: in the notice, state the net vendor price (e.g. €140,000) and the fees separately (e.g. €10,000), or indicate 'total price of €150,000 including €10,000 fees'.
• If you are a tenant, keep all documents: retain the notice, correspondence with the landlord, and any evidence showing that the irregularity caused you damage (refusal of loan letter, price comparison, etc.).
• In case of doubt, challenge promptly: the time limit to challenge a notice is two months from receipt. After this period, the notice is deemed valid and you must vacate. Consult a solicitor without delay.

Further Analysis: Related Case Law and Developments

This decision fits into a line of judgments limiting automatic nullities. For example, the Court of Cassation held that the omission of the pre-emption period in a notice to quit for sale does not lead to its nullity if the tenant suffered no grievance (Cass. civ. 3e, 12 June 2013, no. 12-18.456). Conversely, the failure to mention the price is considered a substantive irregularity, leading to nullity without the need for grievance (Cass. civ. 3e, 4 February 2016, no. 14-29.876). The boundary is thus subtle.

The current trend is towards securing procedural acts: judges favour effectiveness over formal perfection, unless the error causes damage. This means that landlords must be rigorous, but may benefit from a certain indulgence. For tenants, the challenge is to document their damage. In the future, courts may further clarify the notion of grievance in this context.

Summary and Next Steps

FAQ:

• Q: Is a notice to quit for sale that includes estate agent's fees in the price always void? A: No, it is only void if the tenant proves damage (e.g. unable to buy because of the inflated price).
• Q: What should I do if I receive such a notice as a tenant? A: Consult a solicitor promptly. Gather evidence of your damage (refusal of loan, price comparison statement).
• Q: What is the time limit to challenge a notice to quit for sale? A: You have two months from receipt of the notice to apply to the Tribunal Judiciaire. After this period, the notice becomes final.
• Q: Can I buy the property if the notice is void? A: Yes, if the notice is annulled, you can become a purchaser on the legal terms. But beware, the landlord may then sell the property to a third party.
• Q: Can a landlord be penalised for an abusive notice? A: Yes, if the notice is fraudulent (e.g. no genuine intention to sell), the tenant may obtain damages.

In summary: this decision of the Court of Cassation reminds us that not every procedural defect is fatal. Landlords must nevertheless be cautious, and tenants vigilant to prove their damage. If you are affected, do not hesitate to seek a solicitor specialising in property law.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →