Aller au contenu principal
Property Dispute: Solution
Droit-immobilier

Property Dispute: Solution

📅 Décision du 23 November 2017⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 15 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation reminds that plantations made by a farmer during the lease only become the property of the lessor upon renewal of the lease, not before. Analysis of a little-known decision that can prove costly.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 16-16.815 • 2017-11-23 • View the decision →

You are the owner of an agricultural plot in Oloron-Sainte-Marie and you have just discovered that your farmer has planted poplars without telling you. You are wondering whether they belong to you or to him. And above all: when do they become your property? This question, which may seem trivial, has already triggered lengthy and costly disputes. The Court of Cassation has just provided a clear answer in a judgment of 23 November 2017 (No. 16-16.815).

But what exactly does this change for you, whether you are a landlord or an agricultural tenant? This judgment clarifies the articulation between Article 555 of the Civil Code (which governs the fate of buildings and plantations on another's land) and Article L. 411-50 of the Rural Code (specific to the status of agricultural tenancy). In short, the moment when plantations become the property of the lessor depends on the date on which they were made.

In this article, I will tell you the story of this dispute, dissect the judges' reasoning, and above all give you practical advice to avoid finding yourself in a delicate situation.

The Facts: A Story Like Those That Happen Every Day

Imagine a rural land group (GFR), the GFR de la Ramée, which leases agricultural plots to an agricultural operating company, SCEA Chauviré. The lease has been running for years. At some point, SCEA plants poplars on the plots. Then the lease is renewed. Later, the GFR recovers the land and contests the ownership of the poplars: according to it, these plantations belong to it because they were made on its land.

SCEA retorts that the poplars were planted after the start of the lease and that it remained the owner throughout the contract. The dispute comes before the Court of Appeal of Pau, which rules in favour of SCEA: it holds that the lessor leaves the lessee the ownership of works and plantations regularly erected during the lease, and that Article 555 of the Civil Code only applies at the end of the lease.

But the GFR disagrees and appeals to the Court of Cassation. It argues that the Court of Appeal did not check whether the plantations were made before the renewal of the lease. Because if they were made before, then they became the property of the lessor at the time of renewal, by application of Article 555.

The Court of Cassation upholds the appeal: it quashes the Court of Appeal's decision on the ground that it did not investigate whether the plantations were prior to the renewal. In other words, the moment of renewal is crucial: it transfers ownership of the plantations to the lessor, unless otherwise agreed.

The Reasoning of the Court — Dissected

To understand this judgment, we must go back to the texts. Article 555 of the Civil Code provides that, unless otherwise agreed, buildings and plantations made on another's land by a third party become the property of the landowner, but the latter may either keep them (by reimbursing the cost of materials and labour) or require their removal. This article applies to constructions made without right. But in the context of an agricultural lease, the tenant has the right to plant and build for the needs of the farm (Article L. 411-50 of the Rural Code). Therefore, Article 555 only governs the fate of plantations at the end of the lease, not during its term.

The Court of Appeal of Pau had therefore held that, during the lease, the tenant remains owner of his plantations. But it had forgotten to ask whether the poplars were planted before the renewal of the lease. Now, renewal is a new lease. If the plantations existed before, they became the property of the lessor upon renewal, because the new lease has no retroactive effect. This is what the Court of Cassation criticises the Court of Appeal for: not having made this inquiry.

However, note that this solution is not a development but a logical application of the texts. It confirms that the fate of plantations depends on their date of realisation in relation to the renewal. What few people know is that the renewal of an agricultural lease is not a mere extension: it is a new contract that transfers to the lessor ownership of improvements made by the previous tenant. undefined that if you are a tenant and you plant trees, you must be aware that they will become the property of the lessor at the next renewal.

What This Changes for You — Concretely

If you are a landlord (for example in Tarbes, where agricultural leases are frequent), this decision is good news: it reminds you that plantations made by your farmer before the renewal automatically belong to you as of the renewal date. You have nothing to do, no compensation to pay. But be careful: this only applies to plantations regularly authorised by the lease. If the tenant planted without right, Article 555 applies differently.

If you are a tenant (farmer), you must be vigilant: your plantations become the property of the lessor upon renewal. You therefore lose ownership of your trees, even if you planted them at your own expense. However, you can negotiate an exit indemnity or a right of repossession in the lease. undefined, I have encountered cases where the farmer had planted costly orchards (olive trees, walnut trees) and found himself stripped at renewal. A concrete example: in Oloron-Sainte-Marie, one hectare of poplars can be worth €15,000 at maturity. Losing that value without compensation is harsh.

If you are a purchaser of agricultural land, check whether plantations exist and on what date they were made. They could belong to the farmer if the lease has not been renewed since.

In summary, the rule is simple: the tenant's plantations belong to him during the lease, but become the property of the lessor at the first renewal following their realisation. If you are in this situation, you must check the date of your plantations in relation to the last renewal.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Draw up a precise inventory of existing plantations at the signing of the lease. This avoids any dispute over the date of plantations. Have it signed by both parties.
  • Stipulate in the lease the fate of plantations in the event of renewal. For example, provide that the tenant remains owner or receives compensation. This is legal and secures both parties.
  • For the tenant: declare your plantations to the lessor in writing. Send a registered letter with the date and nature of the plantations. This will constitute proof in case of dispute.
  • For the lessor: in case of renewal, have a bailiff's report made of the plantations. This will allow you to claim their ownership if necessary. The cost (about €200) is trivial compared to the stakes.

This decision is part of a consistent line of case law. Already, in a judgment of 15 March 2006 (No. 04-17.691), the Court of Cassation had held that improvements made by the outgoing tenant become the property of the lessor at the end of the lease, unless the new tenant compensates them. Here, the Court specifies that renewal is equivalent to a new expiry of the lease. Conversely, the Court had admitted (Cass. 3e civ., 20 Dec. 2000, No. 99-11.164) that the tenant may retain ownership of his plantations if the lease so provides. The trend is therefore towards protecting the lessor's right of ownership, but with significant contractual freedom. In the future, the courts will continue to examine the date of plantations in relation to renewal. If you are a tenant, do not wait until renewal to negotiate: do it as soon as you plant.

Checklist Before Acting

  • When do plantations become the property of the lessor? At the first renewal of the lease following their realisation, unless otherwise stipulated.
  • Can I retain ownership of my plantations as a tenant? Yes, if the lease expressly provides or if you planted them after renewal (in that case, they remain yours until the next renewal).
  • What to do if the lessor claims my plantations? Check the date of your plantations in relation to the last renewal. If they are later, you are the owner. If they are earlier, the lessor is right. Consult a lawyer.
  • Is there a time limit to act? Yes, the limitation period is 5 years from knowledge of the dispute. Do not delay.
  • Can I claim compensation for my plantations? Yes, if the lease provides for it or if you made them with the lessor's agreement. Otherwise, you risk losing them without compensation.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat droit immobilier & baux  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Quand les plantations du locataire rural deviennent-elles la propriété du bailleur ?

Au premier renouvellement du bail suivant leur réalisation. Si elles ont été plantées avant le renouvellement, elles deviennent la propriété du bailleur à cette date, sauf clause contraire.

Puis-je récupérer la valeur de mes plantations en tant que locataire ?

Oui, si le bail prévoit une indemnité de sortie ou si vous avez un accord écrit. Sinon, en l'absence de clause, vous perdez leur propriété sans indemnité au renouvellement.

Que faire si le bailleur revendique des plantations que j'ai réalisées après le renouvellement ?

Vous êtes protégé : les plantations réalisées après le renouvellement restent votre propriété jusqu'au prochain renouvellement. Conservez les preuves de leur date (factures, photos, constat d'huissier).

Un bailleur peut-il exiger l'enlèvement des plantations à l'expiration du bail ?

Oui, en application de l'article 555 du Code civil, si les plantations n'ont pas été autorisées. Mais en bail rural, le locataire a un droit de planter pour l'exploitation. L'enlèvement est rarement ordonné.

Quels délais pour contester la propriété des plantations ?

La prescription est de 5 ans à compter du jour où le propriétaire a connaissance de l'atteinte à son droit. Agissez rapidement.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 16-16.815
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 23 novembre 2017

Mots-clés

bail ruralarticle 555plantationspropriétéCour de cassationfermagerenouvellement de baillocatairebailleurOloron-Sainte-MarieTarbes

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord in Tarbes: Recovering an Orchard Planted by the Farmer

Mr. Dupont, owner of 5 hectares of land in Tarbes, granted an agricultural lease to SCEA Legrand. The latter planted 2 hectares of apple trees in 2015. The lease was renewed in 2020. Mr. Dupont wants to recover the trees.

Application pratique:

The Court of Cassation confirms that the apple trees, planted before the renewal, became Mr. Dupont's property on 1 January 2020. He can dispose of them without compensation. He must nevertheless check that the lease has no contrary clause. Advice: have a bailiff's report made of the trees to formalise ownership.

2

Tenant in Oloron-Sainte-Marie: Protecting Your Investments

Ms. Martin, a farmer in Oloron-Sainte-Marie, planted walnut trees in 2018 to diversify her farm. Her lease, signed in 2010, was renewed in 2015. She fears losing everything.

Application pratique:

The walnut trees having been planted after the 2015 renewal, Ms. Martin remains their owner until the next renewal. She must however negotiate now a clause in the lease to provide for compensation in case of future loss. She can also request an addendum to the lease to secure her rights.

3

Purchaser of Agricultural Land: Avoiding Unpleasant Surprises

Mr. and Mrs. Garcia are buying an agricultural property in Pau. The land is planted with poplars. The seller claims they belong to him, but an agricultural lease is in progress.

Application pratique:

Before the purchase, the Garcias must check the date of planting of the poplars and the date of the last lease renewal. If the trees were planted before the renewal, they belong to the lessor (the seller). Otherwise, to the tenant. They must require a warranty clause in the deed of sale and consult a lawyer to secure the transaction.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide