Aller au contenu principal
Strike notice in transport: the employer cannot unilaterally decide the end of the strike
Droit-immobilier

Strike notice in transport: the employer cannot unilaterally decide the end of the strike

📅 Décision du 04 July 2012⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The French Supreme Court reminds that only the union that issued the strike notice can decide the end of the strike, not the employer. Employees are not required to stop work for the entire duration of the strike notice.

Reference decision: cc • No. 11-18.404 • 2012-07-04 • View the decision →

Imagine the scene: you live in Biscarrosse and every morning you take the bus to get to work in Mont-de-Marsan. This morning, no bus. A strike notice has been filed by the CGT union. You wait, you grumble, but finally, after an hour, a bus arrives. The driver tells you the strike is over. But who made this decision? The employer? The union?

This seemingly simple question gave rise to an important decision of the French Supreme Court (the highest French judicial court) on 4 July 2012 (No. 11-18.404). The answer is clear: only the union that filed the strike notice can decide the end of the strike. The employer cannot, on its own, consider the strike over because employees have returned to work.

But what does this actually change? Why is this decision important for transport users, employers and employees? Let us dive into the facts and the judges' reasoning.

The facts: a story like many that happen every day

It all starts in Bordeaux, but the case could have happened in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax or Biscarrosse. The CGT Transport Kéolis Bordeaux union files a strike notice on 29 October 2008, for a period of two months (until 29 December). The notice mentions a strike start on 3 November at 10 am, but without specifying the end time. The employer, Kéolis Bordeaux, challenges the validity of the notice before the lower court of Bordeaux. Its argument: the notice must indicate the end time to be valid, and the two-month duration is too long, which paralyses the public service.

The union, for its part, argues that the notice is valid: it mentions the start time, and the two-month duration is necessary to allow negotiations. The lower court rules in favour of the employer in November 2008, but the Bordeaux Court of Appeal, on 3 May 2011, overturns this decision (i.e., it annuls it and holds the notice valid). Kéolis appeals to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court must rule on two questions: 1) Must the notice mention the end time of the strike? 2) Can the employer unilaterally decide that the strike is over if employees resume work?

Twist: the Supreme Court delivers two decisions on the same day. In the decision we are analysing, it answers the second question. In another decision (No. 11-17.924), it answers the first. Here, we focus on the question of the end of the strike.

The court's reasoning — explained

The Supreme Court first recalls the principle: the right to strike is an individual right (each employee freely decides whether to participate). In public services (transport, electricity, etc.), the exercise of this right is governed by a strike notice given by a representative trade union. This notice must mention the start and end time of the work stoppage.

But note: employees, who alone hold the right to strike, are not required to stop work for the entire duration indicated by the notice. In other words, an employee may strike for one hour, then resume work, even if the notice provides for a two-month strike.

What few people know is that the employer cannot, during the period defined by the notice, infer from the absence of striking employees that the strike is over. The decision to end the strike can only be taken by the representative trade union(s) that filed the notice.

In clear terms, the Bordeaux Court of Appeal was correct: the employer cannot unilaterally declare the strike over. Only the union can decide the end of the movement.

The legal basis: Article L. 2512-2 of the French Labour Code (which governs strike notices in public services) and the principle of trade union freedom. The Supreme Court confirms consistent case law: the notice creates a framework, but does not oblige employees to fully adhere to it.

The employer's arguments (which sought to be able to note the end of the strike) were rejected. The Court considers that this would amount to denying the role of the union and allowing the employer to bypass collective bargaining.

What this means for you — in practice

If you are a transport user (like many in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax or Biscarrosse): this decision does not change your daily life, but it explains why buses can be irregular during a strike notice. The employer cannot force employees to work. But it gives you a right: if the strike lasts too long, you can demand a minimum service guarantee.

If you are an employer (for example, a transport company in Mont-de-Marsan): you must respect the strike notice until the union lifts it. You cannot, even if all your employees are at work, consider the strike over. Under penalty of what? If you impose sanctions (salary deduction, suspension) for not striking, you risk being condemned for infringement of the right to strike.

If you are an employee: you are free to strike or not, even during a strike notice. But be careful: if you strike, you lose your salary for the hours not worked. And if you do not strike, you must work normally, unless the employer closes the business (which is rare).

Concrete example: in Biscarrosse, a bus driver earning €2,000 per month who strikes 2 hours a day for a week will lose about €250 (based on a 35-hour week).

If you are a union: you must draft a precise notice, with start and end times. But you can modify or withdraw it at any time.

undefined, I have encountered cases where an employer sanctioned employees for not striking, believing the strike was over. The employer was ordered to pay damages.

How to react? If you are an employer, do not take unilateral decisions on the end of the strike. Contact the union. If you are an employee and the employer sanctions you, bring the matter before the employment tribunal.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • For employers: never unilaterally decide the end of the strike. Even if all employees are working, wait for the union to officially lift the notice. Send a registered letter to the union asking for confirmation of the end of the strike.
  • For unions: draft a precise notice. Mention the date and time of start AND end. If you do not know the duration, use a phrase like "until further notice" or "for an indefinite period", but be aware that this may be challenged. Include a revision clause.
  • For employees: document your participation. If you strike, note the hours and dates. If you do not strike, keep a record of your presence (badge, attestation). This will protect you in case of a dispute.
  • For users: inform yourself. Check transport operators' websites for strike notices. If the strike disrupts your journeys, request compensation (refund, subscription). If the minimum service is not respected, contact the mediator.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

This decision is part of a consistent line of Supreme Court case law. Already in 2006 (decision No. 04-45.214), the Court had ruled that the employer cannot impose an end to a strike. In 2015 (No. 13-25.220), it specified that the strike notice must be filed by a representative union, but that non-unionised employees can also strike without a notice.

The trend is clear: judges protect the right to strike and the role of unions. They refuse to allow the employer to bypass the strike notice.

For the future, this case law could be challenged if the legislator strengthens the minimum service (law of 21 August 2007). But for now, the rule remains unchanged.

What to remember: the strike notice is not a contract, it is a framework. The union remains in control.

In practice: what to do

FAQ:

  1. Can I be sanctioned if I do not strike during a strike notice? No. You have the right to work. The employer cannot sanction you for that.
  2. Can the employer force me to strike? No. Striking is a right, not an obligation.
  3. What if the employer declares the strike over and sanctions me for not striking? Bring the matter before the employment tribunal within 2 years. You can claim damages.
  4. Can a strike notice last several months? Yes, if it is valid. But a judge may find it abusive if it paralyses the public service.
  5. How do I know if a strike notice is valid? It must be filed by a representative union, mention the start and end time, and be notified to the employer.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je être sanctionné si je ne fais pas grève pendant un préavis ?

Non, vous avez le droit de travailler. L'employeur ne peut pas vous sanctionner pour ne pas avoir fait grève.

L'employeur peut-il déclarer la grève finie si tous les salariés travaillent ?

Non, seul le syndicat auteur du préavis peut décider de la fin de la grève. L'employeur ne peut pas le faire unilatéralement.

Que faire si l'employeur me sanctionne pour absence de grève ?

Saisissez le conseil de prud'hommes dans un délai de 2 ans. Vous pouvez demander des dommages et intérêts pour atteinte au droit de grève.

Un préavis de grève doit-il mentionner l'heure de fin ?

Oui, pour être régulier. Mais les salariés ne sont pas obligés de faire grève pendant toute la durée indiquée.

Combien de temps dure un préavis de grève maximum ?

Il n'y a pas de durée maximale légale, mais un préavis trop long peut être jugé abusif par le juge.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 11-18.404
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 04 juillet 2012

Mots-clés

droit de grèvepréavisservices publicstransportsCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Transport user in Biscarrosse

You take the bus every day to go to work in Mont-de-Marsan. A two-month strike notice is filed. Some days the buses run, other days they don't. You don't understand why.

Application pratique:

This decision explains that employees are free to strike or not. The employer cannot force a resumption. You can demand a minimum service. In case of excessive disruption, ask for a partial refund of your subscription.

2

Employer of a transport company in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax

You run a bus company. A union files a strike notice. After a week, all your drivers are working. You think the strike is over and want to resume the normal schedule.

Application pratique:

Do not take this initiative. Contact the union in writing to ask it to officially lift the notice. If you sanction employees for not striking, you risk employment tribunal proceedings.

3

Striking employee in transport

You are a bus driver in Mont-de-Marsan. You went on strike for 3 days, then resumed work. The employer tells you the strike is over and asks you not to strike again.

Application pratique:

You have the right to strike again if the notice is still in force. The employer cannot prohibit you from doing so. Keep evidence of your participation (photos, attestations).

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide