Leading case: cc • No. 14-21.854 • 2015-11-05 • View the decision →
Imagine: you are the owner of a plot of land in Tournefeuille, in the suburbs of Toulouse. You decide to sell it. You go through the procedures, find a buyer, and sign a preliminary contract (compromis de vente). Then, as required by law, you declare your intention to sell to the SAFER (Société d'Aménagement Foncier et d'Établissement Rural). The SAFER notifies you that it is exercising its right of pre-emption (the right to buy the property in place of your buyer). But then you change your mind; you no longer want to sell at all. Can you do so? The answer is yes, according to the Court of Cassation. And that is the significance of this decision of 5 November 2015.
This question is asked by hundreds of owners and farmers every year. Because the SAFER, created to regulate the rural land market and promote the establishment of farmers, has a right of pre-emption over sales of agricultural land. But how does this right interact with the seller's will? Does the declaration made to the SAFER amount to an irrevocable offer?
The Court of Cassation answers clearly: no. The mere declaration is not an offer to sell. Consequently, if the SAFER exercises its right of pre-emption, the sale is not perfected until the seller has definitively accepted. The seller can therefore withdraw. A decision that protects sellers, but may surprise buyers and the SAFER itself.
The facts: a story like many that happen every day
Mr X, owner of an agricultural plot in Tournefeuille, decides to sell it to Mr Y, a neighbouring farmer. In accordance with Article R. 143-9 of the Code Rural et de la Pêche Maritime, Mr X declares his proposed sale to the SAFER. The SAFER, considering that the land is of interest for the establishment of a young farmer, notifies Mr X that it is exercising its right of pre-emption. Mr X, who has in the meantime changed his mind or found another buyer, informs the SAFER that he is renouncing the sale. The SAFER challenges this: according to it, the declaration amounted to an offer to sell, and its exercise of the pre-emption right perfected the sale. It sues Mr X to compel him to sell.
The Tribunal de Grande Instance of Toulouse rules in favour of the SAFER, holding that the declaration was a firm offer. Mr X appeals. The Court of Appeal of Toulouse reverses the judgment: it holds that the declaration is not an offer to sell, but a mere information. The SAFER appeals to the Court of Cassation.
Before the Court of Cassation, the SAFER argues that the declaration provided for in Article R. 143-9 is an offer to sell, and that its right of pre-emption, once exercised, results in the formation of the contract. Conversely, Mr X argues that the law does not impose such an obligation, and that the seller remains free to sell or not until the signing of the notarial deed (acte authentique).
The reasoning of the court — analysed
The Court of Cassation, in its judgment of 5 November 2015, dismisses the SAFER's appeal and upholds the Court of Appeal's decision. Its reasoning is simple but crucial: Article R. 143-9 of the Code Rural requires the seller to declare to the SAFER his intention to sell, but this declaration is not an offer to sell (a firm and definitive proposal to contract). It is a formality of information, intended to allow the SAFER to exercise its right of pre-emption if it wishes.
In other words, the declaration is a necessary preliminary step, but it does not definitively bind the seller. It is only once the seller and the buyer have signed a preliminary contract (compromis) or a promise to sell that the offer is formed. In the absence of such an instrument, the seller can change his mind.
What few people know is that this decision fits within a logic of protecting the seller. The Court of Cassation reminds that the right of pre-emption is an exception to the principle of freedom of contract. It must therefore be interpreted strictly. Here, the SAFER cannot rely on an offer that does not yet exist.
However, note: this solution does not mean that the seller can abuse the situation. If he has already signed a preliminary contract with a buyer, then declared to the SAFER, and the SAFER pre-empts, then the sale becomes perfected. But in our case, there was no prior preliminary contract.
In short, the Court confirms that the declaration to the SAFER is a procedural step, not a contractual commitment. The seller retains his freedom until the notarial deed.
What this changes for you — concretely
For seller-owners: you can change your mind after declaring your sale to the SAFER, as long as you have not signed a preliminary contract. If the SAFER notifies you of its pre-emption right, you can refuse. Concrete example: in Saint-Gaudens, an owner declares the sale of his 2-hectare meadow for €50,000. The SAFER pre-empts at that price. The owner realises that the land has a higher value for a developer. He can withdraw. However, be careful: if you have already signed a preliminary contract with a buyer, you are bound.
For buyers: be cautious. If you are the initial buyer, the SAFER may pre-empt, but the seller may also withdraw. In that case, you lose your purchase. To secure your position, it is advisable to sign a preliminary contract as soon as possible, before the declaration to the SAFER.
For professionals (notaries, estate agents): you must inform your clients of this rule. Do not lead them to believe that the declaration to the SAFER locks in the sale. undefined, I have come across cases where sellers felt trapped after declaring, thinking they could no longer back out. This decision frees them.
For the SAFER itself: this decision limits its power. It cannot force a sale based on a mere declaration. It must wait for a firm commitment from the seller.
Four tips to avoid this type of dispute
- Sign a preliminary contract before any declaration to the SAFER. This formalises your offer and prevents the seller from withdrawing without penalties.
- Consult a lawyer lawyer before declaring a sale to the SAFER. A professional will explain the implications and avoid misunderstandings.
- If you are a seller and change your mind, act quickly. As soon as you receive the pre-emption notice, inform the SAFER in writing of your withdrawal. Do not delay, because the longer time passes, the more complex the situation becomes.
- For buyers, check whether the seller has already signed a preliminary contract. If so, the sale is more secure. If not, ask him to commit in writing before the SAFER declaration.
Further reading: related case law and developments
This decision of the Court of Cassation is part of a line of cases protecting the seller. We can cite an earlier judgment of 20 February 2008 (No. 07-11.914) where the Court had already ruled that the declaration to the SAFER did not constitute an offer to sell. The 2015 decision confirms and clarifies this position. Since then, the courts regularly apply this rule. For example, the Court of Appeal of Toulouse, in a judgment of 12 September 2017, recalled that the SAFER's right of pre-emption can only be exercised on a sale already formed between the seller and a buyer. The trend is therefore clear: the seller remains master of his decision until the signing of the notarial deed. For the future, it is likely that the SAFER will adapt its practices by requiring a preliminary contract before exercising its right.
What you absolutely must remember
FAQ:
- Q: Can I sell my land at a price lower than the SAFER's valuation to avoid pre-emption? R: Yes, but the SAFER can pre-empt at the declared price. If you sell for less, it can pre-empt at that price. No risk of withdrawal on your part if you have signed a preliminary contract.
- Q: What happens if the SAFER pre-empts after I have signed a preliminary contract? R: The sale is perfected with the SAFER. You must sell to the SAFER at the price agreed with the initial buyer.
- Q: Can I cancel my declaration to the SAFER? R: Yes, as long as you have not signed a preliminary contract. The declaration is not irrevocable.
- Q: What are the time limits for exercising the SAFER's right of pre-emption? R: The SAFER has two months from receipt of the declaration to notify its decision. After that period, it is deemed to have waived it.
- Q: Can a notary guarantee that the sale is secure? R: The notary will advise you, but only a lawyer lawyer can provide you with a defence in the event of a dispute. Signing a preliminary contract is the best security.
Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.
Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
servitude-droit-passage-avocat/" rel="dofollow">→ Avocat servitudes & foncier |
→ Browse all our legal articles

