Aller au contenu principal
SAFER pre-emption right: can the seller still back out?
Droit-immobilier

SAFER pre-emption right: can the seller still back out?

📅 Décision du 05 November 2015⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation has ruled that the declaration to the SAFER provided for in Article R. 143-9 of the Rural Code does not constitute an offer to sell. Therefore, the notification of the pre-emption right by the SAFER does not perfect the sale, and the seller can change their mind. Analysis for owners and professionals.

Leading case: cc • No. 14-21.854 • 2015-11-05 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are the owner of a plot of land in Tournefeuille, in the suburbs of Toulouse. You decide to sell it. You go through the procedures, find a buyer, and sign a preliminary contract (compromis de vente). Then, as required by law, you declare your intention to sell to the SAFER (Société d'Aménagement Foncier et d'Établissement Rural). The SAFER notifies you that it is exercising its right of pre-emption (the right to buy the property in place of your buyer). But then you change your mind; you no longer want to sell at all. Can you do so? The answer is yes, according to the Court of Cassation. And that is the significance of this decision of 5 November 2015.

This question is asked by hundreds of owners and farmers every year. Because the SAFER, created to regulate the rural land market and promote the establishment of farmers, has a right of pre-emption over sales of agricultural land. But how does this right interact with the seller's will? Does the declaration made to the SAFER amount to an irrevocable offer?

The Court of Cassation answers clearly: no. The mere declaration is not an offer to sell. Consequently, if the SAFER exercises its right of pre-emption, the sale is not perfected until the seller has definitively accepted. The seller can therefore withdraw. A decision that protects sellers, but may surprise buyers and the SAFER itself.

The facts: a story like many that happen every day

Mr X, owner of an agricultural plot in Tournefeuille, decides to sell it to Mr Y, a neighbouring farmer. In accordance with Article R. 143-9 of the Code Rural et de la Pêche Maritime, Mr X declares his proposed sale to the SAFER. The SAFER, considering that the land is of interest for the establishment of a young farmer, notifies Mr X that it is exercising its right of pre-emption. Mr X, who has in the meantime changed his mind or found another buyer, informs the SAFER that he is renouncing the sale. The SAFER challenges this: according to it, the declaration amounted to an offer to sell, and its exercise of the pre-emption right perfected the sale. It sues Mr X to compel him to sell.

The Tribunal de Grande Instance of Toulouse rules in favour of the SAFER, holding that the declaration was a firm offer. Mr X appeals. The Court of Appeal of Toulouse reverses the judgment: it holds that the declaration is not an offer to sell, but a mere information. The SAFER appeals to the Court of Cassation.

Before the Court of Cassation, the SAFER argues that the declaration provided for in Article R. 143-9 is an offer to sell, and that its right of pre-emption, once exercised, results in the formation of the contract. Conversely, Mr X argues that the law does not impose such an obligation, and that the seller remains free to sell or not until the signing of the notarial deed (acte authentique).

The reasoning of the court — analysed

The Court of Cassation, in its judgment of 5 November 2015, dismisses the SAFER's appeal and upholds the Court of Appeal's decision. Its reasoning is simple but crucial: Article R. 143-9 of the Code Rural requires the seller to declare to the SAFER his intention to sell, but this declaration is not an offer to sell (a firm and definitive proposal to contract). It is a formality of information, intended to allow the SAFER to exercise its right of pre-emption if it wishes.

In other words, the declaration is a necessary preliminary step, but it does not definitively bind the seller. It is only once the seller and the buyer have signed a preliminary contract (compromis) or a promise to sell that the offer is formed. In the absence of such an instrument, the seller can change his mind.

What few people know is that this decision fits within a logic of protecting the seller. The Court of Cassation reminds that the right of pre-emption is an exception to the principle of freedom of contract. It must therefore be interpreted strictly. Here, the SAFER cannot rely on an offer that does not yet exist.

However, note: this solution does not mean that the seller can abuse the situation. If he has already signed a preliminary contract with a buyer, then declared to the SAFER, and the SAFER pre-empts, then the sale becomes perfected. But in our case, there was no prior preliminary contract.

In short, the Court confirms that the declaration to the SAFER is a procedural step, not a contractual commitment. The seller retains his freedom until the notarial deed.

What this changes for you — concretely

For seller-owners: you can change your mind after declaring your sale to the SAFER, as long as you have not signed a preliminary contract. If the SAFER notifies you of its pre-emption right, you can refuse. Concrete example: in Saint-Gaudens, an owner declares the sale of his 2-hectare meadow for €50,000. The SAFER pre-empts at that price. The owner realises that the land has a higher value for a developer. He can withdraw. However, be careful: if you have already signed a preliminary contract with a buyer, you are bound.

For buyers: be cautious. If you are the initial buyer, the SAFER may pre-empt, but the seller may also withdraw. In that case, you lose your purchase. To secure your position, it is advisable to sign a preliminary contract as soon as possible, before the declaration to the SAFER.

For professionals (notaries, estate agents): you must inform your clients of this rule. Do not lead them to believe that the declaration to the SAFER locks in the sale. undefined, I have come across cases where sellers felt trapped after declaring, thinking they could no longer back out. This decision frees them.

For the SAFER itself: this decision limits its power. It cannot force a sale based on a mere declaration. It must wait for a firm commitment from the seller.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Sign a preliminary contract before any declaration to the SAFER. This formalises your offer and prevents the seller from withdrawing without penalties.
  • Consult a lawyer lawyer before declaring a sale to the SAFER. A professional will explain the implications and avoid misunderstandings.
  • If you are a seller and change your mind, act quickly. As soon as you receive the pre-emption notice, inform the SAFER in writing of your withdrawal. Do not delay, because the longer time passes, the more complex the situation becomes.
  • For buyers, check whether the seller has already signed a preliminary contract. If so, the sale is more secure. If not, ask him to commit in writing before the SAFER declaration.

This decision of the Court of Cassation is part of a line of cases protecting the seller. We can cite an earlier judgment of 20 February 2008 (No. 07-11.914) where the Court had already ruled that the declaration to the SAFER did not constitute an offer to sell. The 2015 decision confirms and clarifies this position. Since then, the courts regularly apply this rule. For example, the Court of Appeal of Toulouse, in a judgment of 12 September 2017, recalled that the SAFER's right of pre-emption can only be exercised on a sale already formed between the seller and a buyer. The trend is therefore clear: the seller remains master of his decision until the signing of the notarial deed. For the future, it is likely that the SAFER will adapt its practices by requiring a preliminary contract before exercising its right.

What you absolutely must remember

FAQ:

  • Q: Can I sell my land at a price lower than the SAFER's valuation to avoid pre-emption? R: Yes, but the SAFER can pre-empt at the declared price. If you sell for less, it can pre-empt at that price. No risk of withdrawal on your part if you have signed a preliminary contract.
  • Q: What happens if the SAFER pre-empts after I have signed a preliminary contract? R: The sale is perfected with the SAFER. You must sell to the SAFER at the price agreed with the initial buyer.
  • Q: Can I cancel my declaration to the SAFER? R: Yes, as long as you have not signed a preliminary contract. The declaration is not irrevocable.
  • Q: What are the time limits for exercising the SAFER's right of pre-emption? R: The SAFER has two months from receipt of the declaration to notify its decision. After that period, it is deemed to have waived it.
  • Q: Can a notary guarantee that the sale is secure? R: The notary will advise you, but only a lawyer lawyer can provide you with a defence in the event of a dispute. Signing a preliminary contract is the best security.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
servitude-droit-passage-avocat/" rel="dofollow">→ Avocat servitudes & foncier  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je vendre mon terrain à un prix inférieur à l'estimation SAFER pour éviter la préemption ?

Oui, car le droit de préemption de la SAFER s'exerce au prix déclaré. Si vous vendez moins cher, elle peut préempter à ce prix. En revanche, si vous avez signé un compromis, vous êtes lié. Sans compromis, vous pouvez toujours vous rétracter.

Que faire si la SAFER préempte après que j'ai signé un compromis ?

La vente est alors parfaite avec la SAFER au prix convenu avec l'acquéreur initial. Vous devez vendre à la SAFER. L'acquéreur initial peut réclamer des dommages et intérêts si le compromis le prévoit.

Puis-je annuler ma déclaration à la SAFER ?

Oui, tant que vous n'avez pas signé de compromis de vente. La déclaration n'est qu'une information, pas un engagement. Vous pouvez informer la SAFER de votre rétractation par écrit.

Quels sont les délais pour que la SAFER exerce son droit de préemption ?

La SAFER dispose de deux mois à compter de la réception de votre déclaration pour notifier sa décision. Si elle ne répond pas dans ce délai, elle est réputée avoir renoncé à son droit.

Un notaire peut-il me garantir que la vente est sécurisée ?

Le notaire vous conseillera sur les formalités, mais seul un avocat spécialisé peut vous défendre en cas de litige. Pour sécuriser la vente, il est recommandé de signer un compromis de vente avant toute déclaration à la SAFER.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 14-21.854
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 05 novembre 2015

Mots-clés

SAFERdroit de préemptionoffre de venteCour de cassationfoncier rural

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Seller-owner in Tournefeuille

Mr Dupont, owner of a 3-hectare agricultural plot in Tournefeuille, wishes to sell it to a private individual for €120,000. He declares his project to the SAFER. The SAFER pre-empts at the same price. Mr Dupont changes his mind and wants to keep the land.

Application pratique:

Mr Dupont can withdraw because he has not signed a preliminary contract. He must notify the SAFER in writing of his refusal to sell. The SAFER cannot compel him to sell. He retains full ownership.

2

Buyer in Saint-Gaudens

Ms Martin, a farmer in Saint-Gaudens, wishes to buy a 2-hectare plot for €50,000. The seller declares to the SAFER, which pre-empts. The seller withdraws.

Application pratique:

Ms Martin loses the purchase because no preliminary contract had been signed. To avoid this, she should have signed a preliminary contract before the SAFER declaration. In that case, the sale would have been perfected with the SAFER, and she could have claimed damages.

3

Estate agent in Toulouse

An estate agent in Toulouse advises a seller on the sale of a plot. He thinks that the SAFER declaration locks in the sale. The seller declares, the SAFER pre-empts, but the seller wants to cancel.

Application pratique:

The agent must inform the seller that he can withdraw. To secure the transaction, the agent must have a preliminary contract signed before the declaration. If the seller withdraws after pre-emption, the agent loses his commission.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide