Real Estate Professional: Ancillary Activity Sufficient to Qualify as Such (Cass. civ., 28 March 2012)

You own a plot of land in Guebwiller and a developer offers you an exchange: your land for shares in a future shopping centre. Tempting, isn't it? But if the project falls through, what happens? And if the developer is not a genuine real estate professional, your guarantees vanish. This is exactly the question put to the Court of Cassation in a case that shook the world of property development.

A group specialising in property management creates an SCI to acquire land for a commercial zone. The SCI promises the group an indemnity if the project does not go ahead. But is the SCI a real estate professional? If so, the promise is subject to the Hoguet Law, which imposes mandatory provisions and protects the promisor. The judges' answer would change the game.

In this judgment of 28 March 2012, the Court of Cassation ruled: a company that regularly engages in real estate transactions, even on an ancillary basis, is a real estate professional. It does not matter that this activity serves a group strategy. An analysis of a decision that makes one think about SCI structures.

The facts: a story like many that happen every day

Picture the scene. We are in Annonay, Ardèche, but it could have been in Rixheim or Guebwiller. Prosol Gestion SA, a company specialising in property management, wants to develop a commercial zone of over ten hectares with a hypermarket and independent shops. To do this, it needs land. It approaches SCI Alphonse de Poitiers, which owns the desired plots.

On 15 November 2002, the two parties sign a preliminary sale agreement. But this is not a classic sale: the SCI undertakes to sell the land, and Prosol Gestion undertakes to buy. Except that the price is subject to downward revision if the commercial zone project does not obtain the necessary permits. And to secure the deal, the parties include a clause: if the sale does not go ahead due to failure to obtain permits, the SCI must pay Prosol Gestion a flat-rate indemnity of 3,000,000 francs (approximately €457,000).

But the project fails. Permits are not granted, the sale is cancelled. Prosol Gestion claims the indemnity from the SCI. However, the SCI refuses, arguing that the promise to sell is void because it was not concluded in accordance with the Hoguet Law, which protects non-professional promisors. The SCI claims it is not a real estate professional: it only carried out one transaction, and its corporate purpose is the acquisition and management of real estate, not development.

The Commercial Court rules in favour of Prosol Gestion. The Lyon Court of Appeal reverses: it holds that the SCI is a real estate professional because it regularly engages in real estate transactions. The SCI appeals to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation must decide: is an ancillary real estate activity sufficient to make an SCI a professional?

The court's reasoning — dissected

The question is simple: what is a real estate professional? Article 52 of Law No. 93-122 of 29 January 1993 (the Hoguet Law) requires persons who engage in real estate intermediation, management or transaction operations to hold a professional card and comply with strict conditions. But the law does not precisely define who is a "professional". Case law has had to fill this gap.

In this case, SCI Alphonse de Poitiers argued that it was not a professional because its real estate activity was ancillary. Its corporate purpose was broad: "acquisition and management of real estate", but it had only carried out one transaction: buying the land to resell to Prosol Gestion. For it, an ancillary activity cannot make someone a professional.

The Court of Cassation did not agree. It approved the Court of Appeal which had noted that the SCI "regularly engaged in real estate transactions", regardless of whether this activity was merely ancillary and intended to support a group strategy. In other words, even if real estate is not the core business, if one does it regularly, one is a professional.

Concretely, the Court looked at the actual activity of the SCI: it had bought the land, then resold it; it had granted promises to sell; it had committed to a commercial zone project. These acts show regular practice, even if not exclusive. The notion of "regularity" is key: a single transaction is not enough, but several transactions, even within a single project, can characterise professional activity.

This interpretation is consistent with the spirit of the Hoguet Law, which aims to protect consumers against professionals. If a company presents itself as a professional (it manages properties, makes promises), it must assume its obligations. The Court of Cassation here confirms consistent case law: the status of professional is assessed in concreto, based on actual activity, not on the stated corporate purpose.

What this changes for you — practically

This decision has practical consequences for all real estate players, from developers to landlord-owners and civil companies.

For non-professional landlords or sellers: you are protected. If you sign a promise to sell with a company that presents itself as a professional (even if its real estate activity is ancillary), you benefit from the guarantees of the Hoguet Law: a 10-day cooling-off period, mandatory provisions, prohibition on receiving funds without a professional card. In case of non-compliance, you can request the nullity of the promise. Example: in Rixheim, an owner signs a promise with an SCI that says it "manages its family assets". If the SCI regularly carries out real estate transactions (buy-sell, rental), it is a professional and must comply with the law. If it does not, the owner can withdraw without penalty.

For developers and property groups: be vigilant. If you create an ad hoc SCI for a project, this SCI may be considered a professional if it carries out several transactions (even within the same project). You must therefore ensure that it holds a professional card or complies with the formalities of the Hoguet Law. Otherwise, the promises you sign with owners may be annulled, exposing you to financial losses. Imagine a project in Guebwiller: SCI PromoGueb signs promises with 10 owners. If it has no card, each owner can withdraw, and the project collapses.

For notaries and lawyers: this decision reminds you to verify the professional status of your client. If you draft a promise for an SCI, ask to see its professional card or prove that its real estate activity is occasional. Otherwise, you risk incurring liability.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Check your counterparty's professional card. Before signing a promise to sell or a search mandate, ask to see the "Transaction on buildings and business assets" card issued by the Chamber of Commerce and Industry. If the company does not have one, it cannot receive funds or validly bind you.
• Insist on a preliminary agreement compliant with the Hoguet Law. The document must mention the card number, the financial guarantor, the 10-day cooling-off period, etc. If these mentions are missing, the agreement is void. You can withdraw at any time without penalty.
• Never pay a deposit or guarantee deposit without a guarantee. The law requires that funds be deposited in a blocked account or guaranteed by a surety bond. If the professional asks you to pay directly into its account, refuse. This is a warning sign.
• Consult a lawyer specialising in property law from the start of the project. A lawyer can analyse the situation, verify the professional status and draft protective clauses. In Guebwiller or elsewhere, an investment of €500 in advice can save you a loss of €50,000.

Further exploration: related case law and developments

This decision is part of a line of judgments that broaden the notion of real estate professional. Already in 2005, the Court of Cassation had ruled that an SCI carrying out several property sale transactions is a professional (Civ. 3e, 20 April 2005, No. 04-10.288). More recently, in 2018, it held that a natural person who habitually buys and sells real estate, even without a profit motive, is a professional (Civ. 1re, 28 February 2018, No. 17-10.780).

The trend is therefore towards increased protection of non-professionals. Judges look at the reality of the activity, not the declarations. This means that structures using SCIs to circumvent the Hoguet Law are increasingly risky. In the future, we can expect the Court of Cassation to further specify the criteria of regularity: how many transactions per year? Over what period?

This decision is also a reminder that the Hoguet Law is of public policy: it cannot be derogated from by contract. Even if the parties agree, a professional cannot waive its obligations. This strengthens the legal security of property transactions.

In practice: what to do

1. Before signing a promise to sell with a company, ask for its professional card. If it cannot provide one, ask it to justify that it is not a professional (e.g., a sworn statement of its occasional activity). If in doubt, consult a lawyer.
2. If you are a professional (developer, investor), ensure that your SCIs or ad hoc companies comply with the Hoguet Law. Even if the real estate activity is ancillary, if you carry out several transactions, you are a professional. Obtain a professional card or subcontract the transaction acts to a property agent holding the card.
3. In case of a dispute, act quickly. The limitation period for an action for nullity due to lack of a professional card is 5 years from the date of signature. If you have already paid funds, you can also claim damages.
4. Keep all documents: promises, email exchanges, proof of payment. They will be useful to demonstrate professional status or to prove non-compliance with the law.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →