Aller au contenu principal
Unpublished promise to sell: can the notary be liable?
Droit-immobilier

Unpublished promise to sell: can the notary be liable?

📅 Décision du 20 December 2012⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 8 vues📖 5 min de lecture

A notary who completes a sale despite a prior unpublished promise to sell does not commit a fault, because that promise is unenforceable against third parties. The Court of Cassation reminds that the notary cannot refuse to receive a required deed.

Reference decision: cc • No. 11-19.682 • 2012-12-20 • View decision →

Imagine: you own a house in Pessac, you have signed a preliminary sale agreement (promise to sell) with a buyer, but the notary has not yet published the deed with the land registry (formerly the mortgage registry). A few days later, a second buyer appears with a higher offer. The notary completes the sale with this second buyer. The first buyer, furious, sues you. Is it the notary's fault? The Court of Cassation's answer is clear: no, because the unpublished promise is unenforceable (cannot be invoked) against third parties. Analysis.

The facts: a story that happens every day

In 2005, the company Cilaos signed a preliminary sale agreement to acquire a property owned by the X family, in Tiffauges. The notary in charge of the sale was informed of the existence of this preliminary agreement, but it had not been published with the land registry. Shortly after, the municipality of Tiffauges came forward and offered a higher price. The sellers gave in and signed a second preliminary agreement with the municipality. The notary completed the deed of sale in favour of the municipality. Cilaos, ousted, sued the notary for liability (seeking compensation for its loss, i.e., the damage suffered). The Court of Appeal found the notary liable, holding that he had committed a fault by completing the sale despite knowledge of the first preliminary agreement. The Court of Cassation quashed (annulled) this decision.

The reasoning of the court — explained

The Court of Cassation relied on two texts: Article 1382 of the Civil Code (now Article 1240 since 2016) which requires compensation for damage caused by one's fault, and Article 3 of the law of 25 Ventôse Year XI (relating to land registration). In short, for a notary to be liable, he must have committed a fault. However, a notary cannot refuse to execute (draft and receive) a deed of sale that is regularly requested from him, unless there is a legal reason to refuse. An unpublished promise to sell is unenforceable against third parties, meaning it cannot be invoked against a person who was not a party to it. In other words, the notary was not entitled to refuse the sale to the municipality on the ground that a previous preliminary agreement existed, because that preliminary agreement was not enforceable against the municipality. The Court of Appeal had therefore wrongly attributed a fault to the notary. What few people know is that land registration is essential to make a right enforceable against third parties. Without it, even a notarised deed can be circumvented.

What this means for you — practically

If you are a seller: you can accept a better offer after a first unpublished preliminary agreement, but beware of the consequences with the first buyer. You risk being ordered to pay damages (compensation for loss) if you withdraw without a legitimate reason. Example: in Mérignac, a seller had to pay €20,000 in damages for withdrawing after an unpublished preliminary agreement. If you are a buyer: insist that the preliminary agreement be published quickly. Otherwise, you could lose the property. If you are a notary: you must complete the sale if the deed is requested from you, even if you know of a prior unpublished agreement. Your duty is to check the registration, not to block a sale based on an unenforceable right.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Have your preliminary agreement published without delay: as soon as it is signed, ask your notary to proceed with publication with the land registry. This takes a few weeks but protects you.
  • Insist on a suspensive condition: in the preliminary agreement, include a clause making the sale conditional on the absence of any other published promise. This allows you to withdraw if a competing offer appears.
  • Check prior registrations: before signing, request a statement of registrations on the property. Your notary can do this.
  • If a dispute arises, act quickly: if you are ousted, apply for an interim order (urgent procedure) to have your right recognised. Time limits are short (a few months).

This decision is part of a consistent line: the Court of Cassation protects the notary who executes a deed in the absence of registration. See, for example, Cass. 1st Civ., 12 June 2013, No. 12-18.243, which confirms that the notary does not have to check unpublished promises. On the other hand, if the notary knows of a published promise, he must refuse to execute the deed. The trend is to protect the notary in his role as a public officer, but also to remind of the importance of land registration. In the future, the digitisation of registrations could speed up timeframes and reduce these conflicts.

Checklist before acting

  • Have I had my preliminary agreement published? If not, contact your notary immediately.
  • Am I an ousted buyer? Consult a lawyer to assess your chances of damages.
  • Am I a seller tempted by a better offer? Check whether the first preliminary agreement has been published. If so, you can no longer sell to someone else without risk.
  • How long does publication take? Allow 2 to 4 weeks. In an emergency, an accelerated publication procedure is possible.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Une promesse de vente non publiée est-elle valable ?

Oui, elle est valable entre les parties. Mais elle est inopposable aux tiers, c'est-à-dire qu'un autre acheteur peut acquérir le bien sans être inquiété.

Que faire si je suis évincé par un second acheteur ?

Vous pouvez demander des dommages et intérêts au vendeur pour rupture abusive, mais vous ne pourrez pas récupérer le bien si la seconde vente a été publiée.

Quels sont les délais pour publier un compromis ?

La publication doit être faite dans les deux mois suivant la signature. En pratique, comptez 2 à 4 semaines.

Le notaire peut-il refuser de rédiger un acte ?

Non, sauf si l'acte est illégal ou si une publication antérieure lui interdit. Une promesse non publiée ne justifie pas un refus.

Quel est le coût d'une consultation chez Maître Zakine ?

45€ pour une première consultation de 30 minutes. Un investissement modeste pour sécuriser votre transaction.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 11-19.682
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 20 décembre 2012

Mots-clés

promesse de ventepublicité foncièrenotaireresponsabilitéinopposabilité

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Seller tempted by a better offer

You signed a preliminary agreement with a buyer in Pessac for €300,000, but another offers €320,000. The preliminary agreement is not yet published.

Application pratique:

You can sell to the second buyer, but you risk being ordered to pay damages to the first buyer (often 10% of the price, i.e., €30,000). It is better to negotiate a withdrawal indemnity in the preliminary agreement.

2

Ousted buyer in Mérignac

You signed a preliminary agreement for a house in Mérignac, but the seller eventually sells to a third party. Your preliminary agreement was not published.

Application pratique:

You cannot recover the property, but you can claim damages. Generally, courts award between 5% and 10% of the price. Act quickly: apply for an interim order within 3 months.

3

Notary challenged

A notary completes a sale despite a prior unpublished promise to sell. The ousted buyer sues the notary for liability.

Application pratique:

The notary is not liable, as the ruling recalls. He simply needs to check the registration. If it has not taken place, he can execute the deed without fear.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide