Reference Decision: cc • No. 16-10.139 • 2017-10-11 • View the decision →
Imagine the scene: in Capbreton, in a small service company, an employee announces to his employer that he intends to stand for election to the single staff delegation (DUP). The employer, displeased, dismisses him even before the first round. The employee invokes the special protection enjoyed by candidates. But how far does this protection extend? The Court of Cassation, in a decision of 11 October 2017, ruled on a crucial question: the time at which the employer must have knowledge of the candidacy for the protection to apply. And the answer is not as simple as one might think.
Every owner or business manager, especially in jurisdictions like Mont-de-Marsan or the Landes, wonders how to manage tensions with an employee who stands as a candidate in professional elections. This decision sheds light on the rights and obligations of each party. But beware: the protection is not automatic and unlimited. Let us decipher this landmark decision together.
The Facts: A Story Like Many Others
Mr X, an employee of the company SEFAM, based in Mimizan, announces to his employer, before the first round of the DUP elections, that he intends to stand as a candidate in the second round. The employer, informed of this imminent intention, initiates a dismissal procedure. The employee is summoned to a preliminary meeting and then dismissed. He challenges his dismissal by invoking the protection of Article L. 2411-7 of the Labour Code (now codified as Article L. 2411-7), which prohibits the dismissal of a candidate for membership of the DUP without authorisation from the labour inspectorate.
The case comes before the employment tribunal, then the court of appeal. The lower courts consider that the employer had knowledge of the imminence of the candidacy from the employee’s announcement before the first round, and therefore the protection applied. But the Court of Cassation quashes this decision. For the Court, knowledge of the imminence of the candidacy only protects the employee until the actual filing of his candidacy for the second round. In this case, the employee had not yet filed his candidacy at the time the employer became aware of his intention, and the dismissal occurred before this filing. Therefore, the protection was not acquired.
The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed
The Court of Cassation relies on Article L. 2411-7 of the Labour Code (protection of candidates for professional elections). It recalls that this protection benefits the candidate from the first round and until the second round, but on condition that the employer has knowledge of the candidacy or its imminence. The crucial point is the moment of this knowledge: it is at the time of sending the summons to the preliminary meeting for the dismissal that the employer must know that the employee is a candidate or about to be.
In this case, the employer knew that the employee intended to stand in the second round, but this knowledge was prior to the filing of the candidacy. For the Court, this knowledge of the imminence only protects the employee until the actual filing of the candidacy. If the employee does not file his candidacy within a reasonable time, the protection ceases. In other words, a mere intention, even if known to the employer, does not confer definitive protection.
This reasoning marks an important clarification: the protection is not retroactive indefinitely. It is linked to the reality of the candidacy. If the employee delays in concretising his intention, the employer may legitimately think that the candidacy has been abandoned. undefined, I have encountered cases where employees announced their candidacy months in advance to protect themselves from dismissal, without ever filing a candidacy. This decision puts an end to such abuses.
What This Changes for You — Practically
For employers, this decision is a relief. It allows you not to be paralysed by a mere announcement of candidacy. If an employee informs you of his intention to stand for election, but does not file his candidacy within a reasonable time (a few days to a few weeks depending on circumstances), you can initiate a dismissal procedure without fear of nullity. However, beware: if the candidacy is filed before the summons to the preliminary meeting is sent, the protection applies fully.
For employees, the message is clear: do not delay in formalising your candidacy. If you announce your intention to your employer, file your candidacy quickly to benefit from the protection. In Mimizan, an employee who announced his candidacy a month before the second round without filing it could be dismissed without the protection applying, if the employer acts before the filing.
For landlords or property managers employing staff, this decision also concerns you. If you have an employee who stands for professional elections (for example, in a cleaning company), you must check whether his candidacy is effective before considering a dismissal. A dismissal made in violation of this protection may result in substantial damages (often several months’ salary) and reinstatement of the employee.
Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute
- For the employer: As soon as you become aware of an intention to stand, ask the employee to confirm in writing and set a reasonable deadline for filing his candidacy. In the absence of filing within this time, you may consider that the protection is not acquired.
- For the employee: If you intend to stand as a candidate, file your official candidacy as soon as possible, before any announcement to the employer. Thus, the protection runs from the filing.
- For both parties: Keep all written evidence of exchanges (emails, registered letters). The date of the employer’s knowledge is crucial.
- For the lawyer: Systematically check the chronology: date of announcement of intention, date of filing of candidacy, date of summons to the preliminary meeting. A gap of a few days can make all the difference.
Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments
This decision is part of a line of Court of Cassation decisions that clarify the contours of the protection of candidates. For example, a decision of 8 July 2009 (no. 08-41.086) held that the protection applies as soon as the employer has knowledge of the candidacy, even if it is not yet official. The 2017 decision goes further by limiting this protection over time in the absence of filing. Another decision of 13 February 2013 (no. 11-27.587) had already emphasised that the protection only applies if the employer has knowledge of the candidacy at the time of dismissal. The 2017 decision refines this principle by specifying that knowledge of the imminence is only a provisional protection.
The trend of the courts is therefore to protect the employee candidate, but to sanction abuses. The future may see an extension of this logic to other mandates (e.g., union mandates).
Key Points to Remember
FAQ:
- Q: Can my employer dismiss me after I have announced my intention to stand for election?
A: Yes, if you do not file your candidacy within a reasonable time after this announcement. The protection is only provisional until the actual filing. - Q: What should I do if I am dismissed while my candidacy is official?
A: Challenge the dismissal before the employment tribunal and seek nullity of the dismissal, with reinstatement or damages. - Q: What is a reasonable time to file one’s candidacy after the announcement?
A: Case law does not set a specific duration, but generally a few days to a few weeks, depending on circumstances (proximity of the election, etc.). - Q: Must the employer seek authorisation from the labour inspectorate to dismiss a candidate?
A: Yes, if the candidacy is official and the employer has knowledge of it at the time of initiating the procedure.
Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →
