Aller au contenu principal
Remembrement and Eviction: When the Cadastral Designation Does Not Change the Subject of the Dispute
Droit-foncier

Remembrement and Eviction: When the Cadastral Designation Does Not Change the Subject of the Dispute

📅 Décision du 27 January 1967⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 6 vues📖 6 min de lecture

A property owner brings eviction proceedings against an occupier without title. During the proceedings, a remembrement changes the cadastral designation of the plot. The Court of Cassation rules that the subject of the claim is not modified: the eviction remains valid. Analysis for property owners and real estate professionals.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 65-14.447 • 1967-01-27 • View the decision →

You have just purchased a beautiful house in Gemenos, in the Bouches-du-Rhône, with a large garden. Everything is fine until the day you discover that a neighbour is using part of your plot without permission. You initiate eviction proceedings. But then, in the middle of the process, a rural remembrement changes the cadastral numbers of your land. The disputed plot changes its designation. Is your eviction claim compromised? The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 27 January 1967, clearly answers: no. A simple change of cadastral designation does not alter the subject of the eviction claim. Let us analyse this decision that reassures property owners faced with remembrement operations.

The facts: a story like many others

Mr Bernard is the owner of a plot in Gemenos. A third party settles on this plot without any right or title. Mr Bernard brings an eviction action before the court. But in the meantime, on 23 March 1963, the departmental remembrement commission issues a decision modifying the land registry. The plot in question receives a new cadastral designation. The defendant then argues that the eviction claim has become moot, since the plot no longer exists under the old number. The Court of Appeal, seized of the matter, rejects this argument: it finds that the remembrement plan was deposited at the town hall, which resulted in the transfer of ownership. But it specifies that the eviction claim concerns an identified piece of land, and that the simple change of cadastral number does not modify the subject of the dispute. The Court of Cassation confirms: "does not modify the subject of an eviction claim brought by the allocation of a plot, the Court of Appeal which gives to this plot the new cadastral designation it has received since the claim." In other words, the eviction remains valid despite the remembrement.

The reasoning of the court — analysed

The Court of Cassation relies on the principles of property law and civil procedure. The subject of the dispute is determined by the claims of the parties, as set out in the originating document (Article 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure). Here, the eviction claim concerns a specific piece of land, identified by its location and boundaries. The subsequent change of its cadastral number, following a remembrement, does not affect the identity of the property. In short, what matters is not the number on paper, but the physical reality of the land. The Court of Appeal therefore correctly rectified the cadastral designation to reflect the new reality, without changing the subject of the claim. The judges recall that remembrement, an administrative operation in the public interest, has the effect of transferring ownership of plots, but does not extinguish prior rights. Thus, the occupier without title cannot rely on the change of number to avoid eviction. This decision is a classic application of the principle that the accessory follows the principal: the cadastral designation is an accessory to the right of ownership, and its modification does not invalidate the legal action.

What this means for you — concretely

For the landlord owner: You have a tenant who no longer pays and you initiate eviction proceedings. If, during the proceedings, a remembrement changes the lot number of your property, do not panic: your claim remains valid. You simply need to inform the judge of the new number, as Mr Bernard did. For the occupier without title: You cannot hide behind a change of designation to challenge the eviction. The court looks at the reality of the land. For the purchaser: If you buy a property that has been subject to a remembrement, check that the sale deed mentions the new cadastral designation. But know that the old number does not invalidate the sale. Concrete example in Allauch: Imagine a plot formerly registered as section A no. 100, becoming section B no. 50 after remembrement. A neighbour occupies it without right. You sue for eviction mentioning the old number. The court will rectify the designation on its own. The eviction will be ordered. undefined, I have encountered cases where owners, worried, wished to initiate a new procedure. It was unnecessary: the 1967 case law protected them.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Keep all documents relating to your property: sale deeds, old and new cadastral plans, remembrement decisions. In the event of a change of number, you can easily establish continuity.
  • In case of unlawful occupation, act quickly: Do not wait for a possible remembrement. Sue for eviction as soon as possible. The case law protects you, but a swift procedure avoids complications.
  • Update your lease contracts: If you rent out a property, ensure that the lease mentions the most recent cadastral designation. This avoids any dispute over the identity of the leased property.
  • Consult a solicitor specialising in property law: A professional will know how to adapt your procedural documents in the event of a cadastral change, and save you from costly mistakes.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

This 1967 decision is part of a consistent line of authority. Earlier, the Court of Cassation had already held that remembrement does not modify the nature of real rights (Civ. 3e, 12 March 1965). More recently, it recalled that a claim for recovery of possession is not affected by a change of cadastral number (Civ. 3e, 8 June 2011, no. 10-16.987). The trend is therefore clear: courts favour the physical reality of the property over administrative formalities. However, beware: if the remembrement modifies the boundaries of the land (for example, if the plot is divided or merged), the subject of the claim could be affected. But in the case of a simple change of number, the solution is settled. What few people know is that this case law also applies to subdivision operations or plot divisions.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I evict an occupier without title even if the cadastral number has changed?
Yes, the eviction claim remains valid. You simply need to inform the judge of the new number.

2. What if my neighbour challenges the eviction by relying on the remembrement?
You can rely on the 1967 judgment. The occupier cannot hide behind a change of designation.

3. Can the remembrement cancel my right of ownership?
No, remembrement transfers ownership from one plot to another, but does not extinguish the right. You remain owner of the allocated plot.

4. What are the time limits for bringing an eviction?
There is no statutory time limit, but it is advisable to act quickly to avoid adverse possession (30 years for land).

5. Do I have to issue a new claim after the remembrement?
No, it suffices to ask the judge to rectify the cadastral designation. The proceedings continue.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
servitude-droit-passage-avocat/" rel="dofollow">→ Avocat servitudes & foncier  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je expulser un occupant sans titre si le numéro cadastral a changé suite à un remembrement ?

Oui, la demande d'expulsion reste valable. Vous devez simplement informer le juge du nouveau numéro cadastral.

Que faire si mon voisin conteste l'expulsion en invoquant le remembrement ?

Vous pouvez vous prévaloir de l'arrêt de 1967 : le simple changement de numéro n'affecte pas l'objet de la demande.

Le remembrement peut-il annuler mon droit de propriété ?

Non, le remembrement transfère la propriété d'une parcelle à une autre, mais ne supprime pas le droit. Vous restez propriétaire de la parcelle attribuée.

Quels sont les délais pour engager une expulsion ?

Il n'y a pas de délai légal, mais il est conseillé d'agir rapidement pour éviter la prescription acquisitive (30 ans pour un immeuble).

Dois-je refaire une assignation après le remembrement ?

Non, il suffit de demander au juge de rectifier la désignation cadastrale. La procédure se poursuit.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 65-14.447
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 27 janvier 1967

Mots-clés

remembrementexpulsiondésignation cadastralepropriétéCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Evicting owner: remembrement during proceedings

Mr Dupont, owner in Gemenos, has sued a neighbour occupying without title. During proceedings, a remembrement changes the plot number from A123 to B456. He fears his claim is void.

Application pratique:

The 1967 case law protects him: he simply needs to ask the judge to mention the new number. The eviction will be ordered as planned. He can save the cost of a new proceeding.

2

Occupier without title: attempt to challenge by remembrement

Mrs Martin occupies a plot in Allauch without right. The owner brings eviction proceedings. She invokes the change of cadastral number due to a remembrement to defeat the claim.

Application pratique:

The court will reject her argument: the subject of the claim is the physical land, not its number. She will have to leave the premises. Advice: do not rely on an administrative modification to avoid eviction.

3

Purchaser of a remembrement property: verification of designation

Mr Leblanc buys a house in Gemenos. The sale deed mentions the old cadastral number, because the remembrement occurred after the signing of the preliminary contract. He worries about the validity of his title.

Application pratique:

The sale is valid. He must ask the notary to rectify the deed to include the new number. In case of dispute, he can prove continuity of ownership through the remembrement documents.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide