Retirement and Commercial Leases: De-specialisation Available Even in Combined Employment and Retirement

You are a trader in Vierzon, approaching retirement age, but wish to continue working while preparing to transfer your business. This is the case for many bar-tobacco or restaurant managers who, after decades of activity, want to assign their commercial lease to retire peacefully. But what happens if you are already in combined employment and retirement, i.e., you receive a basic pension while still carrying on your business? Can you still benefit from the rights attached to your commercial lease, particularly de-specialisation (change of activity permitted under the lease) with a view to its assignment?

This is a question that hundreds of owners of commercial premises ask themselves each year, often reluctant to see their premises change use. However, the law (Article L. 145-51 of the Commercial Code) offers the tenant who requests to benefit from their retirement rights the possibility of obtaining de-specialisation of the lease in order to assign it. But until 2011, there was uncertainty: is this option available to someone already in combined employment and retirement? The Court of Cassation ruled on this in a judgment of 23 November 2011, providing a clear and favourable answer for traders.

This decision, made in a case opposing a tenant to her landlord in Pau, was confirmed by the highest court. It affirms that a tenant who combines a basic retirement pension and professional activity may request de-specialisation to assign the lease, provided they apply for their supplementary pension. A reversal that secures transactions and reassures both assignors and assignees.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mrs X, tenant of commercial premises used as a bar-restaurant in Pau, had operated her business for years. Upon reaching retirement age, she began receiving her basic pension while continuing her activity, in accordance with the provisions of the Law of 21 August 2003 on combined employment and retirement. Wishing to pass on the business, she entered into an assignment of the lease in favour of the limited liability company Z in May 2008, with a change of activity (de-specialisation) to a bar-restaurant activity. She notified this assignment to her landlord, who refused to accept it.

The landlord, owner of the premises, considered that Mrs X could not rely on the de-specialisation provided for in Article L. 145-51 of the Commercial Code, because she was not requesting to “benefit from her retirement rights” in the strict sense: she was already retired for the basic pension. According to him, de-specialisation was only available to the tenant who completely ceased their activity to retire, not to someone combining employment and retirement.

The dispute was brought before the commercial court, then the Pau Court of Appeal, which ruled in favour of Mrs X on 12 July 2010. The landlord appealed to the Court of Cassation. In its judgment of 23 November 2011, the Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal, thereby confirming that de-specialisation is available to a tenant who already receives a basic retirement pension and applies for their supplementary pension. This decision set a precedent and now applies throughout France, including in Bourges, Vierzon, or Mehun-sur-Yèvre.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

To understand the judgment, it is necessary first to grasp the basic text: Article L. 145-51 of the Commercial Code. This provision allows a commercial tenant who “requests to benefit from their retirement rights” to obtain de-specialisation of the lease (i.e., authorisation to change the activity provided for in the lease) with a view to assigning it to a third party. De-specialisation is a privilege granted to the elderly tenant to facilitate the transfer of their business.

The question was: what does “request to benefit from their retirement rights” mean? The landlord argued for a restrictive interpretation: only the tenant who ceases all activity and liquidates all their rights (basic and supplementary) can claim de-specialisation. However, Mrs X, already a basic pensioner, continued to work and only applied for her supplementary pension. According to the landlord, she did not meet the condition.

The Court of Cassation rejected this analysis. It held that the text does not distinguish between basic and supplementary retirement. As long as the tenant requests to benefit from their retirement rights — and that request is effective (here, the supplementary pension) — they can obtain de-specialisation, even if they are already in combined employment and retirement for the basic pension. The highest court relied on the Law of 21 August 2003, which relaxed the conditions for combined employment and retirement, to consider that the spirit of the text is to favour the transfer of businesses without penalising those who wish to continue an activity.

This interpretation is liberal and consistent with the legislator's objective: to prevent elderly traders from being blocked in their assignment by a recalcitrant landlord. It confirms that combined employment and retirement is not an obstacle to de-specialisation, which secures commercial property transactions.

What This Changes for You — Practical Effects

For landlord owners, this decision means that you cannot oppose an assignment of a lease with de-specialisation solely on the ground that your tenant is already retired on a basic pension. If your tenant applies for their supplementary pension and wishes to assign the lease with a change of activity, you must accept it, unless there is a serious and legitimate reason (for example, if the new activity is dangerous or harmful to the building). Practically, an owner in Vierzon who leases commercial premises to a baker retiring cannot refuse the new tenant turning it into a hairdressing salon, if the baker is in combined employment and retirement and applies for their supplementary pension.

For tenant traders, this is security: you can prepare for your retirement peacefully, even if you continue working. You can assign your business with a different activity from that provided for in the lease, without having to negotiate with your landlord. For example, if you run a café in Mehun-sur-Yèvre and want to assign it to a caterer, de-specialisation is possible as long as you apply for your supplementary pension. However, note: the assignment must be notified to the landlord, who may challenge the price or conditions, but not the principle.

For assignees, this is an opportunity: you can take over a business with a different activity, without fear of the landlord opposing it. But check that the assignor has followed the procedure: notification of the assignment with de-specialisation, proof of the application for supplementary pension, etc. An assignee in Bourges who wishes to buy a newsagent's business to turn it into a clothing shop must ensure that the assignor has indeed applied for their supplementary pension before the assignment.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Anticipate the application for supplementary pension. If you are in combined employment and retirement and plan to assign your lease, make the application for supplementary pension before the assignment, or at the latest at the same time. The Court of Cassation requires that the application be genuine and not fictitious. Keep written evidence of your application to your pension fund.
• Draft a lease amendment clarifying the de-specialisation. At the time of assignment, have the landlord sign an amendment that records the change of activity. In case of refusal, you will have to apply to the judicial court to have your right recognised. A well-drafted amendment can avoid years of proceedings.
• Notify the assignment with de-specialisation by extrajudicial act (bailiff). Notification to your landlord must be made in the prescribed legal forms: registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt or bailiff's act. In Vierzon, the cost of a bailiff for a notification is around €150, a modest investment to secure the assignment.
• Consult a specialist lawyer before any assignment. Each situation is unique: the lease may contain restrictive clauses, de-specialisation may be partial or total, and the landlord may invoke a serious reason to oppose it. Prior advice will prevent you from making irreversible mistakes. For example, a client in Mehun-sur-Yèvre assigned his lease without notifying de-specialisation: the landlord obtained the nullity of the assignment, and the seller had to reimburse the assignee.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This 2011 judgment is part of a trend favourable to tenants. Before it, some courts considered that de-specialisation was only possible in the event of complete cessation of activity. The Court of Cassation had already initiated a relaxation in a judgment of 3 November 2004 (No. 02-18.345), ruling that the tenant could assign the lease to a descendant while retaining an activity. But it was the 2011 judgment that clearly opened the way for combined employment and retirement.

Since then, several decisions have confirmed this direction. For example, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled in 2018 that an application for supplementary pension suffices, even if the tenant continues to carry on an ancillary activity. However, note: if the tenant does not apply for any pension (neither basic nor supplementary) and merely claims to be “preparing for retirement”, de-specialisation is not granted. Case law requires an effective application.

In the future, it is expected that the courts will continue to interpret the text broadly, in the context of an ageing trader population and the development of combined employment and retirement. Landlords must therefore be vigilant: systematically refusing a request for de-specialisation on grounds of combined employment and retirement may expose them to damages for abuse of right.

Checklist Before Acting

FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions

• Can I assign my lease with de-specialisation if I am already retired on a basic pension and do not apply for a supplementary one? No, the judgment requires an application for supplementary pension. If you do not apply for anything, you cannot rely on Article L. 145-51.
• What if my landlord refuses de-specialisation? You must apply to the president of the judicial court by way of summary proceedings (urgent procedure) to have your right recognised. The judge may order de-specialisation under penalty (e.g., €100 per day of delay).
• What are the time limits for acting? Notification of the assignment must be made at least one month before the assignment. If the landlord refuses, you have until the date of the assignment to apply to the judge. After that deadline, the assignment may be annulled.
• Can the new tenant change activity after the assignment? Yes, de-specialisation is personal to the assignor. The new tenant may carry out the activity provided for in the assignment deed, but for a further change, they must themselves fulfil the conditions.
• Does this decision apply to leases subject to the commercial lease regime? Yes, Article L. 145-51 only concerns commercial leases governed by the regime (Articles L. 145-1 et seq.). Short-term leases of less than 2 years are not affected.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →