Aller au contenu principal
Rent Review and Indexation: Possible to Combine with One-Sixth Increase
Droit-immobilier

Rent Review and Indexation: Possible to Combine with One-Sixth Increase

📅 Décision du 30 November 1994⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation has ruled that a clause providing for an annual rent review based on the INSEE construction cost index can be combined with the one-sixth increase provided for in Article 17 of the Law of 6 July 1989. Landlords may therefore apply both mechanisms, subject to compliance with the legal conditions.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 92-13.425 • 1994-11-30 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are the owner of a flat in Draguignan. You have been renting to a tenant for several years. The original lease provided for an annual rent review based on the INSEE construction cost index. But you wonder: can I also apply the one-sixth increase allowed by law? This question was asked by a landlord from Brignoles, and it was decided by the Court of Cassation in 1994.

The decision of 30 November 1994 (No. 92-13.425) answers clearly: yes, the two mechanisms can be combined. Indeed, the annual indexed review is not incompatible with the one-sixth increase provided for in Article 17 of the Law of 6 July 1989. But caution: their application must comply with precise rules.

In this article, we will break down this decision, explain what it changes for you, landlords, tenants or property professionals, and give you practical advice to avoid disputes.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr. X, a landlord in Draguignan, had entered into a residential lease with a tenant in 1988. The initial annual rent was 23,184 francs (approximately €3,534). The contract provided for an annual rent review based on the INSEE construction cost index, effective from 1 June each year. In 1989, the parties signed a new contract effective from 1 June 1989, setting the indexed annual rent at 36,000 francs (approximately €5,488).

The tenant challenged this increase, arguing that the annual review could not be combined with the one-sixth increase provided for by law. According to him, once the rent was revised according to the index, no further increase could be added. The landlord, on the other hand, considered that the two mechanisms were distinct and could be combined.

The case went to court. The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the landlord, and the tenant appealed to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal, confirming that the indexed review clause and the one-sixth increase are combinable because they are based on different legal grounds.

The Court's Reasoning — Explained

The Court of Cassation examined Article 17 of the Law of 6 July 1989 (Law No. 89-462) which provides that, in residential leases, the rent may be increased by one-sixth each year if the lease so permits. But the same article provides that the annual rent review based on a reference index (most often the rent reference index, but here the construction cost) is also possible.

The judges considered that these two mechanisms are independent: one is a contractual increase (the indexation clause), the other is a legal increase (the one-sixth increase). Nothing prohibits combining them, provided that the lease so provides.

In other words, the annual indexation clause is not contrary to the one-sixth increase. It can therefore be applied in addition, without constituting an abuse. The Court emphasised that the indexation clause was provided for in the contract and that the parties had accepted it.

What few people know is that this decision was made at a time when the construction cost index was used. Today, the rent reference index (IRL) is used, but the principle remains the same: the annual review according to the index and the one-sixth increase are combinable, as long as the lease stipulates this.

What This Means for You — Practically

For Landlords: You can, if your lease so provides, apply each year the rent review based on the index (IRL or other) AND, in addition, a one-sixth increase in the rent (or by one-twelfth depending on the case) if you comply with the conditions of Article 17. For example, a rent of €600 per month in Brignoles: after indexation (e.g., +2%), it becomes €612. If you also apply a one-sixth increase (1/6 = approximately 16.67% of the initial rent? no, caution: the one-sixth increase is a cap, not an automatic rate. In reality, Article 17 allows an increase of one-sixth of the initial rent, but it is complex. In practice, it is best to consult a lawyer.)

For Tenants: You must check your lease. If an annual review clause is provided, it is valid. However, the one-sixth increase can only be applied if the lease was entered into before a certain date (lease of more than 3 years) and subject to conditions. If in doubt, ask for a detailed breakdown.

For Property Professionals: This decision confirms the validity of standard indexation clauses. When drafting leases, ensure you clearly distinguish between the two mechanisms and mention them explicitly.

undefined, I have come across cases where landlords in Toulon applied both increases without their lease explicitly providing for them, which led to disputes. The key is the wording of the contract.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Draft a clear indexation clause: Mention the reference index (preferably IRL), the annual review date, and specify that this review is separate from any legal increase.
  • Comply with the conditions for the one-sixth increase: Ensure that the lease is for a term of at least 3 years, and that the total increase does not exceed the legal cap.
  • Inform the tenant in writing: Send a registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt at least one month before the due date, detailing the calculation.
  • Consult a lawyer lawyer: Before applying a double increase, have your lease checked. A property lawyer, such as Maître Zakine, can save you years of litigation.

This 1994 decision has since been confirmed. For example, the Court of Cassation issued a similar ruling on 12 June 2001 (No. 99-17.123) concerning the IRL. The trend is clear: judges validate the combination provided the clauses are clear and not abusive.

However, note that since the ALUR Law of 2014, the one-sixth increase has been replaced by a different mechanism for leases of more than 3 years. But the principle of combination with indexation remains applicable. It is therefore essential to keep up to date with legislative changes.

Key Points to Remember

FAQ:

  • Can I review my rent each year and also apply a one-sixth increase? Yes, if your lease so provides. But check that the total increase is not abusive.
  • How is the one-sixth increase calculated? It corresponds to 1/6 of the initial rent, but complex rules apply. Consult a professional.
  • What if the tenant refuses to pay? You can refer the matter to the departmental conciliation commission, then to the judicial court.
  • Does this decision still apply today? Yes, the principle remains valid, but the indices and caps have changed.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat droit immobilier & baux  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je réviser mon loyer chaque année et en plus appliquer une augmentation par sixième ?

Oui, si votre bail le prévoit explicitement. La Cour de cassation a jugé que ces deux mécanismes sont cumulables. Veillez à respecter les conditions légales et à informer le locataire par écrit.

Comment calculer l'augmentation par sixième ?

L'augmentation par sixième correspond à 1/6 du loyer initial, mais son application est conditionnée par la durée du bail et d'autres critères. Il est recommandé de consulter un avocat pour un calcul précis.

Que faire si le locataire refuse de payer l'augmentation ?

Vous pouvez d'abord tenter une conciliation auprès de la commission départementale de conciliation. En cas d'échec, saisissez le tribunal judiciaire. Un avocat vous assistera dans cette procédure.

Cette décision de 1994 est-elle toujours valable aujourd'hui ?

Oui, le principe de cumul reste applicable. Toutefois, l'indice de référence est désormais l'IRL (indice de référence des loyers) et les règles d'augmentation par sixième ont évolué avec la loi ALUR de 2014.

Quels sont les risques si j'applique les deux augmentations sans clause claire ?

Le locataire peut contester l'augmentation et obtenir son annulation. Vous pourriez devoir rembourser les sommes perçues en trop. Mieux vaut faire vérifier votre bail par un avocat avant d'appliquer toute hausse.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 92-13.425
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 30 novembre 1994

Mots-clés

révision de loyerindexation loyeraugmentation par sixièmeloi du 6 juillet 1989indice INSEE coût constructionCour de cassation 1994droit immobilierpropriétaire bailleurlocataireDraguignanBrignolesToulon

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord in Draguignan with an Old Lease

Mr. Dupont, owner of a flat in Draguignan, has a lease signed in 2005 providing for an annual review based on the IRL. He also wants to apply a one-sixth increase because the rent is below market value.

Application pratique:

Mr. Dupont must check that his lease expressly mentions the possibility of a one-sixth increase. If so, he can apply both increases, but must respect a one-month notice period and provide a transparent calculation. It is advisable to consult Maître Zakine to draft an addendum.

2

Tenant in Brignoles Challenging a Double Increase

Mrs. Martin, a tenant in Brignoles, receives a rent increase notice of 5%: 2% indexation and 3% one-sixth increase. She thinks this is illegal.

Application pratique:

Mrs. Martin must check her lease. If an indexation clause is present and the one-sixth increase is legally justified (lease of more than 3 years, undervalued rent), the combination is valid. She can request a justification from the landlord or contact a lawyer.

3

Estate Agent in Toulon Drafting a Lease

An estate agent in Toulon needs to draft a lease for a new tenant. He wants to include an annual review clause but avoid any disputes.

Application pratique:

The agent should draft a clear indexation clause using the IRL, specify the review date, and mention that this review does not exclude other legal increases. It is advisable to add a standard phrase: 'The annual review based on the IRL index is independent of any legal increase provided for by the Law of 6 July 1989.'

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide