Abusive Termination of Negotiations: Sale of a Business Compromised in Rethel

Imagine: you are the owner of commercial premises in Rethel and you enter into discussions with a buyer to sell the business. Weeks pass, a preliminary agreement is even signed, then, without valid reason, you back out. The seller, who was counting on this sale to finance his retirement, is left in a dead end. What does he risk? Can he sue you?

This is exactly the question that arose before the Court of Cassation in 1994 in a case where a bank, owner of the premises, had abruptly refused to assign the lease, causing the sale of the business to fail. The judges ruled: this refusal, motivated by blameworthy recklessness, constituted an abuse of the right to terminate negotiations. A lesson that also applies to landlords in Sedan or elsewhere.

This decision, although old, remains a reference. It shows that even before the final signature, a party cannot withdraw without serious reason, under penalty of having to compensate the other. Let's dive into the details.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

In this case, the company BMCE owned commercial premises where a business was operated by Mr and Mrs X... They wished to sell their business to buyers, Mr and Mrs Z... On 16 December 1987, a preliminary agreement for the sale of the business was signed between Mr and Mrs X... and Mr and Mrs Z..., subject to the condition precedent of obtaining the landlord's consent, the company BMCE.

Until then, everything seemed to be going well. But on 30 December 1987, BMCE refused to assign the lease. Why? No valid reason was given. Mr and Mrs X... and Z... were then unable to finalise the sale. They sued BMCE for compensation for their loss.

The Reims Court of Appeal, hearing the dispute, condemned BMCE for abusive termination of negotiations. The judges held that BMCE acted with blameworthy recklessness: it gave no legitimate reason, and its conduct directly caused the failure of the sale. The bank appealed to the Court of Cassation, but the Court of Cassation dismissed its appeal on 22 February 1994.

This scenario, you may see it in Rethel or Sedan: a landlord who changes his mind at the last moment, a tenant who loses his buyer, a purchaser who has already taken out loans. The financial consequences can be severe.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The legal basis of this decision is Article 1382 of the Civil Code (old), since 2016 Article 1240. This text provides that "any act of a person which causes damage to another obliges the person by whose fault it occurred to repair it". In short, if a person commits a fault and that fault causes harm to another, he must compensate him.

But what is a "fault" in the context of negotiations? The Court of Cassation specifies that the mere fact of breaking off negotiations is not in itself wrongful: everyone is free not to contract. However, this freedom is not absolute. If the termination occurs under circumstances that reveal an intention to harm, blameworthy recklessness or bad faith, then it becomes abusive.

In this case, the trial judges found that BMCE had, for several months, led the parties to believe that it would give its consent. It had even inquired about the date of signature of the preliminary agreement. Then, without reason, it refused. This conduct was characterised as "blameworthy recklessness": a fault, therefore, because the bank did not appreciate the consequences of its reversal.

The Court of Cassation upheld this reasoning, considering that the appeal judges had sufficiently established the causal link between the refusal to assign and the loss suffered by Mr and Mrs X... and Z... The bank could not hide behind its contractual freedom to escape liability.

Note: the decision does not create an obligation to conclude the contract, but an obligation to negotiate in good faith. This is a fundamental nuance, often misunderstood.

What This Means for You — Concretely

For landlord owners (such as in Sedan), this decision is a warning: you cannot, without valid reason, cause the sale of a business to fail after giving your approval in principle. If you do, you risk having to compensate the seller and the buyer. Example figures: a business in Rethel valued at €120,000, loss of clientele, agency fees, lawyer's fees: the total loss can reach €150,000.

For tenant operators (the sellers of the business), the decision is protective. If your landlord abusively refuses to assign the lease, you can claim damages from him. You will need to prove blameworthy recklessness (absence of reason, sudden reversal, etc.) and quantify your loss (loss of sale, expenses incurred, loss of profit).

For purchasers (like Mr and Mrs Z...), you are not without recourse. If the sale fails because of the landlord, you can also take action against him. You may have already paid a deposit, taken out a loan, or given up another opportunity. All of this can be compensated.

In practice, the time limit for taking action is 5 years from the damaging event (Article 2224 of the Civil Code). The amounts at stake depend on the value of the business and the expenses incurred. Do not wait: the longer you delay, the harder it will be to prove the causal link.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Formalise your intentions in writing: from the start of discussions, send an email or letter stating that your final agreement is subject to certain conditions. Avoid verbal promises that could be interpreted as a commitment.
• Do not give your consent without reflection: if you are a landlord, take the time to study the situation of the buyer (solvency, business sector). A refusal after a too hasty agreement in principle exposes you.
• Motivate your refusal: if you must refuse a lease assignment, do so in writing, setting out objective and verifiable reasons (e.g., non-compliance with conditions precedent, lack of guarantee).
• Consult a lawyer before terminating: a simple consultation can save you from a costly condemnation. In Rethel as in Sedan, preventive advice is better than a trial.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This 1994 decision is part of a consistent line of the Court of Cassation. Already in 1972, the Commercial Chamber had held that the abusive termination of negotiations could engage the liability of its author (Com. 20 March 1972). More recently, the "Manoukian" decision (Full Court, 6 October 2006) specified that the fault must be characterised, and that the mere fact of breaking off is not wrongful.

Since 1994, the trend has been towards protecting the party who legitimately believed the contract would be concluded. Judges increasingly require the party who breaks off to justify a serious reason. In matters of commercial leases, the refusal to assign must be motivated by a legitimate and proportionate interest (e.g., lack of solvency of the assignee).

If you are in litigation in Sedan or Rethel, know that local courts (Reims Commercial Court, Reims Court of Appeal) apply this case law. The commented decision remains a reference for specialised lawyers.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can I break off negotiations if I have signed no document? Yes, in principle. But if your conduct led to a belief in a firm agreement, the termination may be abusive. It is better to always state that the negotiations are non-binding.
2. What must I prove to obtain damages? Three elements: a fault (blameworthy recklessness, bad faith), a loss (loss of sale, expenses), and a causal link between them.
3. Is there a time limit to act? Yes, 5 years from the day you became aware of the damage. In practice, consult a lawyer immediately after the termination.
4. Can I seek specific performance of the sale? No, contractual freedom prevents forcing someone to sell. You can only obtain damages.
5. Can a verbal agreement suffice? In law, yes, but it is very difficult to prove. Always prefer a written document.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →