Right of Way Easement: When a Recognitory Deed Cannot Replace the Constitutive Deed

Imagine: you have just bought a house in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, with a pretty garden and a path that crosses the neighbour's property to access the road. The seller gave you a paper, signed by the previous owner, mentioning a "right of way". You are confident, right? Not so fast. What happens if this paper does not refer to the original deed that created this right? Your neighbour can challenge your passage, and you risk being blocked. This is exactly what the Court of Cassation decided on 13 May 2009 (judgment No. 08-15.819).

Every property owner, at some point, asks themselves: "Is my right of way valid?" Easements (real property rights burdening one piece of land for the benefit of another) are often a source of neighbour disputes. And for good reason: they can be established in several ways, but the law requires solid proof. Article 695 of the Civil Code is clear: a discontinuous conventional easement (such as a right of way, which is only used intermittently) cannot be acquired by prescription (the passage of time). It must be established by a deed (a written instrument). This constitutive deed is the original proof of the easement.

But what if you have lost this deed? Can a recognitory deed (an instrument recognising the existence of an already created easement) replace it? Yes, on one imperative condition: this recognitory deed must refer to the constitutive deed. Without this reference, it is null and void. The Court of Cassation reaffirmed this in this judgment, with a strictness that has concrete consequences for hundreds of property owners.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

In Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, Mr and Mrs X... had bought a house with a right of way over the neighbouring property owned by Mr and Mrs Y... This right of way was mentioned in the acquisition deed of Mr and Mrs X..., but without any reference to the original deed that had constituted it. For years, they used this path without any problem. Then one day, a disagreement arises: Mr and Mrs Y... decide to block the passage, considering that the easement does not validly exist. Mr and Mrs X... sue them to have their right recognised.

The Tribunal de Grande Instance of Mont-de-Marsan, within its jurisdiction, ruled in favour of Mr and Mrs X... at first instance: it considered that the acquisition deed, which mentions the right of way, constitutes a sufficient deed. Mr and Mrs Y... appeal. The Court of Appeal of Pau reverses the judgment: it considers that the acquisition deed of Mr and Mrs X... is only a recognitory deed, and that it does not refer to the constitutive deed. Consequently, the easement is not established. Mr and Mrs X... appeal to the Court of Cassation.

The case comes before the Court of Cassation. Mr and Mrs X... argue that the acquisition deed, even without reference to the original deed, constitutes recognition of the easement. But the high court does not follow them: it dismisses their appeal and confirms the appellate judgment. For the Court, the recognitory deed must imperatively refer to the constitutive deed. Failing that, it cannot replace the latter, and the easement is deemed non-existent. Mr and Mrs X... therefore lose their right of way.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation bases its decision on Article 695 of the Civil Code. This text provides: "The constitutive deed of the easement, with regard to those who cannot prescribe, can only be replaced by a recognitory deed of the easement, and not by a deed emanating from the owner of the servient tenement." In other words, if you cannot prove the easement by thirty-year prescription (which is impossible for a discontinuous easement like a right of way), you must produce the original deed (the notarial deed, the contract) that created the easement. If you have lost this deed, you can replace it with a recognitory deed, but on condition that the latter expressly refers to the constitutive deed.

In plain language, the recognitory deed is not a creating act: it merely records the existence of an already born easement. For it to be valid, it must indicate from which original deed it derives. For example, "By deed of 1 January 1980, a right of way was constituted; the present deed recognises this right." Without this mention, the recognitory deed is insufficient.

What few people know is that the Court of Cassation applies a very strict rule of evidence here. The objective is to avoid fraud: imagine that you could create an easement by drafting a simple paper without any link to an authentic deed. This would open the door to abuses. The judges' solution is therefore logical: for reasons of legal certainty, the recognitory deed must be linked to an identified constitutive deed.

undefined, I have come across cases where property owners thought they were protected by a mention in their sale deed, but without reference to the original deed. Result: they had to negotiate with the neighbour to buy a right of way, sometimes at a high cost. This decision reminds us that it is not enough to have a paper: you need the right paper.

What This Changes for You — Practically

For a landlord property owner in Saint-Vincent-de-Tyrosse, this decision means that you must check the easement deeds of your property before letting or selling. If you sell a house with a right of way, you must ensure that this right is properly justified by a constitutive deed. Failing that, the buyer could challenge the easement, and you could incur liability for latent defects (hidden defects of the property that render it unfit for use).

For a tenant, the situation is different: the tenant is not the owner, but they can benefit from the easement attached to the leased property. If the owner cannot prove the easement, the tenant risks losing access. It is therefore prudent, before signing a lease, to ask to see the deeds.

For a buyer, this is a major point of vigilance. During the purchase, your notary must verify that the easements mentioned in the sale deed are justified by constitutive deeds. If the original deed is missing, the notary can ask the seller to provide a compliant recognitory deed. If this is not possible, you must demand a guarantee or renounce the purchase. Example: in Saint-Vincent-de-Tyrosse, a buyer purchased a house with a right of way, but the recognitory deed in the sale deed did not refer to the constitutive deed. The neighbour challenged it, and the buyer ended up without access. He had to initiate proceedings, with legal fees of €3,000 to €5,000, and a loss of time of several months.

If you are in this situation, you must act quickly. Gather all documents: sale deed, previous notarial deeds, plans, certificates. Consult a lawyer specialising in property law to assess your chances. However, beware: acquisitive prescription (adverse possession) cannot apply to discontinuous easements (Article 691 of the Civil Code). So even if you have been using it for 30 years, you do not acquire the right of way without a deed.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Keep all notarial deeds carefully. The constitutive deed is often an authentic deed (with a notary). Keep it in a safe or with your notary. Make digital copies.
• Require a compliant recognitory deed when purchasing. Before signing, ask your notary to verify that any easement mentioned in the sale deed is supported by a constitutive deed or a recognitory deed that refers to it.
• Use a chartered surveyor. If you have doubts about the existence or extent of an easement, a surveyor can consult the land registry and notarial archives to find the original deed.
• Do not rely on prescription. For discontinuous easements (passage, view, etc.), even prolonged possession does not create a right. Only a written deed is valid.
• In case of a dispute, do not block the passage yourself. If you are the owner of the servient tenement (the one bearing the easement), do not block your neighbour's passage without a court decision. You could be ordered to pay damages for voie de fait (unlawful action by an individual) and be liable for damages (money paid to remedy harm).

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

The Court of Cassation has already ruled on this point. In a judgment of 13 February 2008 (No. 06-19.074), it held that "the recognitory deed of an easement must refer to the constitutive deed of that easement". The 2009 judgment merely confirms this position. The trend is therefore constant: judges require an explicit reference.

Another important decision is that of 15 November 2006 (No. 05-17.546), where the Court clarified that the recognitory deed may be a deed under private signature (signed between individuals), provided it mentions the constitutive deed. But beware: a deed under private signature has less probative force than an authentic deed. In case of a challenge, it will be easier to contest.

For the future, this case law should remain stable. Notaries and lawyers are now vigilant on this point. If you are a property owner, do not wait for a dispute to check your deeds. A preventive check can save you a lot of trouble.

What You Absolutely Must Remember

FAQ:

• Is my sale deed sufficient to prove an easement? No, if it does not refer to the constitutive deed. It only has value as a recognitory deed, which is insufficient if not linked to the original deed.
• What if I have lost the constitutive deed? You can request a copy from the notarial office that received the deed. Notaries keep minutes (originals) for at least 100 years.
• Can I acquire an easement by long use? No, for discontinuous easements (passage, drawing water, etc.), prescription does not apply. Only a written deed counts.
• Can my neighbour block the passage if I do not have the right deed? Yes, he can challenge the easement. You risk losing your right, unless you prove that the recognitory deed refers to the constitutive deed.
• How much does a procedure to recognise an easement cost? Legal fees vary from €2,000 to €5,000 depending on complexity, plus possible expert fees and court costs. Prevention is better than cure.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →