Aller au contenu principal
Servitude of public utility: a planning permission does not protect you
Droit-foncier

Servitude of public utility: a planning permission does not protect you

📅 Décision du 03 April 1984⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 12 vues📖 6 min de lecture

A planning permission is always granted subject to the rights of third parties, particularly planning servitudes. The French Supreme Court reminds that its holder cannot ignore a servitude of public utility. If you build on a servitude, you risk demolition, even with planning permission. Discover how to protect yourself and the available remedies.

Reference decision: cc • No. 83-11.164 • 1984-04-03 • View decision →

Imagine: you have just bought a plot of land in Antibes, near the sea. You obtain planning permission, you build your dream villa. A few months later, an oil pipeline runs under your garden. The operating company demands the demolition of your house because it is built on a servitude of public utility (a legal constraint imposed for the public interest). "But I have planning permission!" you cry. Alas, the French Supreme Court answers: the permission does not protect you. A decision from 1984, still relevant today, reminds that any permission is granted subject to the rights of third parties, including servitudes. What to do? This article explains everything.

The facts: a story like many that happen every day

Mr X, a landowner in Antibes, buys a plot. He obtains planning permission and builds a building. However, this land is crossed by a pipeline used for transporting hydrocarbons, protected by a servitude of public utility. The operating company asks him to demolish the building or obtain a derogation (a special authorisation) to adapt his project to the servitude. Mr X turns against his notary, claiming that the latter did not inform him of the existence of this servitude. He reproaches him for a breach of his duty to advise (obligation to inform and advise the client). The Court of Appeal (second instance court) appoints an expert to determine whether the construction must be demolished. But the French Supreme Court (the highest French court) intervenes: it says that the lower court judges (the magistrates who judge the facts) did not need to ask this question. They could directly find that the construction was built in disregard of the servitude and that the damage (the harm suffered) was certain. The planning permission changes nothing. The case therefore bounced back: the notary had to answer for his fault.

The reasoning of the court — analysed

The French Supreme Court relies on a fundamental principle: a planning permission is always granted subject to the rights of third parties (persons who could be affected by the construction) and in particular subject to the existence of a planning servitude. In other words, the permission does not give you an absolute right to build anywhere. It gives way to a servitude of public utility (a legal constraint for the public interest, such as the passage of a pipeline). Consequently, the holder of the permission cannot override such a servitude. In this case, the Court of Appeal had asked an expert to determine whether the construction should be demolished. But the French Supreme Court considers that this question was unnecessary: as soon as the construction disregards a servitude of public utility, the damage is established. The notary, who had not informed his client of the servitude, committed a fault engaging his liability (obligation to compensate the damage) on the basis of article 1240 of the Civil Code (ex-art. 1382): "Any act whatever of man which causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it occurred to repair it." Planning permission does not prevent this action. The decision confirms previous case law: permission is never an absolute guarantee. It is a consistent solution, not a reversal. The judges thus rejected the notary's argument that attempted to make his liability depend on the validity of the permission.

What this changes for you — concretely

For owners: if you buy land, always check the existence of servitudes of public utility (pipeline, power lines, railways, etc.). Planning permission does not protect you. You could be forced to demolish your construction at your own expense. Example: in Le Cannet, an owner had to demolish a garage built on a servitude for the passage of electrical cables. Cost: €15,000 for demolition, not including legal costs. For tenants: if you rent a property located on a servitude, you could suffer nuisances (works, restrictions). You can ask the landlord for explanations. For buyers: before signing a preliminary contract, have a servitude report prepared by your notary. Servitudes of public utility are often mentioned in planning documents (PLU, local planning plan) or available at the town hall. If you are in this situation, you must: 1) stop the works if possible, 2) consult a lawyer lawyer, 3) bring a liability action against the notary or the seller for failure to inform. The time limit to act is 5 years from the discovery of the damage. The amounts at stake can be considerable: demolition, loss of property value, relocation costs.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Check servitudes before buying: ask the seller or your notary for a planning certificate (document listing applicable rules) and consult your commune's PLU. In Antibes, the PLU mentions servitudes related to pipelines and power lines.
  • Have a legal diagnosis carried out: a lawyer can analyse the risks. This costs between €300 and €800, but can save you a €50,000 demolition.
  • Do not rely solely on planning permission: as the Court says, permission is always subject to the rights of third parties. Even if the administration grants it, a servitude can block your project.
  • If in doubt, suspend works: if you discover a servitude after starting, stop everything. Engage a lawyer to negotiate a derogation or compensation. Haste worsens your situation.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

This 1984 decision is part of a consistent line: planning permission does not confer a right to build contrary to servitudes. This principle is found in a Conseil d'État judgment of 13 July 1965, which specifies that permission is granted subject to the rights of third parties. More recently, the French Supreme Court extended this rule to conventional servitudes (between neighbours) in a judgment of 12 May 2021 (n° 19-22.105). The trend is clear: judges protect servitudes, even if this goes against a permission. For the future, expect this rule to be reinforced, particularly with the rise of renewable energies (wind turbines, solar panels) which create new servitudes. What few people know: planning permission can be annulled by the administrative judge, but even if it is valid, it does not prevail over a servitude. In short, your only protection is prior verification.

What you absolutely must remember

FAQ:

1. Can I build on a servitude if I have planning permission? No. Permission is granted subject to the rights of third parties. You must respect the servitude, on pain of demolition.

2. What should I do if I discover a servitude after building? Consult a lawyer. You can request a derogation from the servitude or bring an action against the seller or notary for failure to inform. The time limit is 5 years.

3. Is the notary liable? Yes, if he did not inform you of the servitude. He engages his professional liability. You can claim damages.

4. What are the financial risks? Demolition can cost tens of thousands of euros. Not to mention the loss of property value and legal costs.

5. Can I obtain compensation? Yes, if you prove fault (seller, notary, etc.). But you will not be compensated by the administration that granted the permission, as it is not responsible for servitudes.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
servitude-droit-passage-avocat/" rel="dofollow">→ Avocat servitudes & foncier  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je construire sur une servitude si j'ai un permis de construire ?

Non. Le permis de construire est délivré sous réserve des droits des tiers, notamment des servitudes. Vous devez respecter la servitude, sinon vous risquez la démolition de votre construction.

Que faire si j'ai construit sur une servitude sans le savoir ?

Consultez un avocat spécialisé en droit immobilier. Vous pouvez demander une dérogation à la servitude ou engager une action contre le vendeur ou le notaire pour défaut d'information. Le délai pour agir est de 5 ans à compter de la découverte du dommage.

Le notaire est-il responsable si je n'ai pas été informé d'une servitude ?

Oui, le notaire a un devoir de conseil. S'il ne vous a pas informé de l'existence d'une servitude d'utilité publique, il engage sa responsabilité professionnelle et vous pouvez réclamer des dommages et intérêts.

Combien coûte une démolition suite à une servitude ignorée ?

Les coûts varient selon la construction : pour une maison individuelle, comptez entre 10 000 et 30 000 €. Sans compter les frais de justice et la perte de valeur du terrain.

Puis-je obtenir une indemnisation de la mairie qui a délivré le permis ?

Non, la mairie n'est pas responsable des servitudes d'utilité publique. Vous devez vous retourner contre le vendeur ou le notaire s'ils ne vous ont pas informé.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 83-11.164
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 03 avril 1984

Mots-clés

servitude d'utilité publiquepermis de construireresponsabilité notairedémolition constructiondroit immobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Owner in Antibes builds over a pipeline

An owner buys land in Antibes, obtains planning permission and builds a villa. Six months later, the company operating a pipeline under the land demands demolition. The owner discovers that the notary had not informed him of the servitude.

Application pratique:

This case law allows the owner to hold the notary liable for failure to inform. He can obtain damages covering the cost of demolition (estimated at €50,000) and the loss of property value. He must act within 5 years and consult a lawyer to build a strong case.

2

Buyer in Le Cannet discovers a servitude after purchase

A couple buys a house in Le Cannet. Two years later, they want to extend the garage but discover a servitude for the passage of electrical cables. The planning permission obtained by the former owner is valid, but the servitude prohibits any construction.

Application pratique:

The buyers can take action against the seller for latent defect or failure to inform, and against the notary. The 1984 decision strengthens their position: planning permission is not a protection. They can seek annulment of the sale or damages. A lawyer will help quantify the loss (approximately €20,000 in loss of value).

3

Tenant in Grasse suffers forced works

A tenant rents a flat in Grasse. A year later, the gas company undertakes works to secure a pipeline crossing the garden. The tenant suffers nuisances and can no longer use the garden.

Application pratique:

The tenant can claim a rent reduction or damages from the landlord, who should have informed him of the servitude. The case law confirms that the landlord cannot hide behind planning permission. The tenant should consult a lawyer to assess his loss of enjoyment (approximately €150 per month of nuisance).

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide