Aller au contenu principal
Owners' Association: A Non-Professional Even with a Professional Managing Agent
Droit-immobilier

Owners' Association: A Non-Professional Even with a Professional Managing Agent

📅 Décision du 25 November 2015⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 6 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation has ruled that the owners' association retains its status as a non-professional for the purposes of consumer law, even when represented by a professional managing agent. A key decision that protects co-owners against unfair terms.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 14-21.873 • 2015-11-25 • View the decision →

Imagine the scene: you own a flat in Argelès-sur-Mer, in a seaside residence. The managing agent, a large professional company, imposes a sudden increase in service charges, or an unfair term in the management contract. You ask yourself: "As a co-ownership, are we considered professionals or consumers?" The answer is not trivial: if the owners' association is a professional, it cannot invoke the protection of consumer law against unfair terms. But if it is a non-professional, then articles such as Article L. 136-1 of the French Consumer Code (which allows unfair terms to be deemed unwritten) apply. The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 25 November 2015, ruled: the owners' association does not lose its status as a non-professional, even if represented by a professional managing agent. A breath of fresh air for co-owners!

But concretely, what does this decision mean for you, an owner in Le Barcarès or elsewhere? Let's decode this case and its practical implications together.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr and Mrs Dupont have owned a flat in Argelès-sur-Mer since 2005. Their co-ownership is managed by IFT Immobilier, a reputable professional managing agent. In 2012, the managing agent proposed a new management contract including "exceptional" administration fees for sending reminder letters, charged at €20 per letter. The owners' association, represented by its management committee, contested these fees as abusive. The dispute concerned the validity of the term: could the association invoke the legislation on unfair terms? IFT argued that the association, represented by a professional, could not be considered a non-professional.

The case went to the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Perpignan, then to the Cour d'Appel of Montpellier. The Cour d'Appel ruled in favour of the managing agent: in its view, the owners' association, by entrusting its management to a professional managing agent, acted in a professional context and could not benefit from the protection of the Consumer Code. The association appealed to the Court of Cassation.

On 25 November 2015, the Court of Cassation quashed the appeal judgment. It held that the owners' association, a private legal entity, does not act in a professional capacity. The fact of being represented by a professional managing agent does not strip it of its status as a non-professional. In short, the association remains a "consumer" within the meaning of consumer law.

The Reasoning of the Court — Deconstructed

The Court of Cassation relied on Article L. 136-1 of the French Consumer Code (now contained in Article L. 212-1), which deems unfair terms unwritten in contracts concluded between a professional and a non-professional or a consumer. The question was: is the owners' association a "non-professional"?

The Court recalled that the status of non-professional is assessed with regard to the activity of the legal entity: the association has no professional activity; it manages the common parts on behalf of the co-owners, who are themselves consumers. The professional managing agent is merely an agent (representative); it does not act in its own name but on behalf of the association. In other words, the association does not "professionalise" its mission by entrusting its management to a professional.

What few people know is that this decision is part of a trend protecting consumers. The Court of Cassation had already ruled, in a judgment of 26 March 2008 (No. 06-18.508), that an association of co-owners could rely on the legislation on unfair terms. Here, it confirms and clarifies: even with a professional managing agent, the association remains non-professional.

However, note that this protection only covers unfair terms in the management contract or contracts concluded by the association with third parties (suppliers, contractors). It does not affect the validity of general meeting decisions.

What This Changes for You — Concretely

If you are a co-owner, this decision is a powerful weapon against unfair terms imposed by your managing agent. For example, reminder fees of €20 per letter, formal notice fees of €50, or terms imposing disproportionate penalties for late payment: all of these can be challenged as unfair.

If you are a landlord owner in Le Barcarès, and your managing agent charges you "exceptional" fees for simply consulting a quote, know that the association can take action. In practice, I have seen cases where co-ownerships have recovered several thousand euros after having unfair terms annulled.

For tenants, this case law has an indirect impact: if service charges are reduced due to the annulment of unfair terms, your landlord may pass on the reduction to your rental charges, especially if charges are provisioned.

If you are a buyer, check before purchasing whether the management contract contains potentially unfair terms. An association that has already won a case on this ground is a guarantee of good management.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Have your management contract examined by a lawyer specialising in consumer law or co-ownership law. An unfair term can be annulled even years after signing.
  • Mobilise the management committee. It can alert you to questionable terms. Do not hesitate to ask questions at the general meeting.
  • Keep all documents. Management contract, amendments, invoices, minutes of general meetings: everything can be useful in the event of a dispute.
  • Do not accept fees without justification. All fees must be provided for in the contract and correspond to an actual service. If in doubt, ask for a written explanation.

Before the 2015 decision, some courts of appeal considered that the association, as a legal entity managed by a professional, acted in a professional context. But the Court of Cassation put an end to this restrictive interpretation. In a more recent judgment of 14 March 2019 (No. 17-22.304), it held that the owners' association can also invoke the two-year limitation period provided for by the Consumer Code for unfair terms, further strengthening its protection.

This trend is consistent: judges protect consumers, even when they are organised as a legal entity. However, note that the concept of "non-professional" should not be confused with that of "consumer" (natural person). But the result is the same: the association can benefit from the protective provisions of the Consumer Code.

Checklist Before Taking Action

  • Who can act? The owners' association, represented by its managing agent (even a professional) or by an authorised co-owner.
  • What is the deadline? To challenge an unfair term, you have a period of two years from the discovery of the term. After this period, the term is deemed unwritten, but it is safer to act quickly.
  • What is the cost? Legal action costs between €1,500 and €3,000 in lawyers' fees, but can yield much more if unfair fees are refunded.
  • How to prove the unfairness? The term must create a significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties. For example, a term allowing the managing agent to unilaterally modify its fees would be unfair.
  • What if the managing agent refuses to negotiate? Refer the matter to the judicial court. If you win, the term will be deemed unwritten and any sums unduly collected must be refunded.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat copropriété & ASL  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Le syndicat des copropriétaires peut-il invoquer la législation sur les clauses abusives ?

Oui, selon la Cour de cassation (arrêt du 25 novembre 2015), le syndicat des copropriétaires est un non-professionnel, même s'il est représenté par un syndic professionnel. Il peut donc invoquer l'article L. 212-1 du code de la consommation pour faire annuler les clauses abusives.

Que faire si mon syndic impose des frais de relance abusifs ?

Vous pouvez contester ces frais en invoquant leur caractère abusif. Rassemblez les preuves (contrat de syndic, factures) et consultez un avocat. Si la clause est annulée, les sommes indûment perçues doivent être remboursées.

Quel est le délai pour agir contre une clause abusive dans un contrat de syndic ?

Vous disposez d'un délai de deux ans à compter de la découverte de la clause pour agir. Ce délai est prévu à l'article L. 212-1 du code de la consommation.

Qui peut intenter une action en justice pour le syndicat ?

L'action peut être intentée par le syndicat des copropriétaires, représenté par son syndic (même professionnel) ou par un copropriétaire mandaté par l'assemblée générale.

Cette décision protège-t-elle aussi les locataires ?

Indirectement, oui. Si les charges de copropriété sont réduites grâce à l'annulation de clauses abusives, le bailleur peut répercuter cette baisse sur le locataire, surtout si les charges sont provisionnées.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 14-21.873
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 25 novembre 2015

Mots-clés

syndicat des copropriétairesclause abusivenon-professionnelsyndic professionneldroit de la consommation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Co-owner challenging abusive management fees

Mr Martin, a co-owner in Argelès-sur-Mer, receives a bill for €200 for reminder fees for 10 letters. The management contract provides for €20 per reminder letter. He considers these fees abusive.

Application pratique:

Mr Martin can refer the matter to the management committee to challenge the term. If the term is found to be unfair, it will be deemed unwritten and the €200 must be refunded. It is advisable to consult a lawyer specialising in co-ownership law.

2

Landlord owner suffering excessive service charges

Mrs Durand, a landlord owner in Le Barcarès, sees her service charges increase by 30% due to exceptional management fees imposed by the managing agent. She cannot pass on this increase to her tenant.

Application pratique:

Mrs Durand can ask the association to challenge these fees. If the association obtains the annulment of the unfair terms, charges will decrease, improving her rental profitability. She must act quickly to avoid losing her investment.

3

Buyer checking the management contract before purchase

Mr and Mrs Leroy wish to buy a flat in Perpignan. Their notary advises them to check the co-ownership's management contract for any unfair terms.

Application pratique:

The Leroys can request a copy of the management contract and have it examined by a lawyer. If unfair terms are identified, they can negotiate a reduction in the purchase price or require the seller to obtain their annulment before signing.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide