Droit Immobilier

A Legal Action May Be Brought

📅 Décision du 10 December 1985⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

A legal action may be brought by way of counterclaim by filing submissions. Therefore, it is correctly decided by a Court of Appeal that the starting point of the two-year limitation period applicable to the claim against his insurer by a contractor – who had requested payment of the balance of the construction price from the client, who had filed a counterclaim citing defects – must be set not at the date of the judgment ordering the contractor to pay for the defects, but at the date of the client's counterclaim seeking compensation for those defects.

Reference decision: cc • No. 84-14.851 • 10 December 1985 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A legal action may be brought by way of counterclaim by filing submissions. Therefore, it is correctly decided by a Court of Appeal that the starting point of the two-year limitation period applicable to the claim against his insurer by a contractor – who had requested payment of the balance of the construction price from the client, who had filed a counterclaim citing defects – must be set not at the date of the judgment ordering the contractor to pay for the defects, but at the date of the client's counterclaim seeking compensation for those defects.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly adhere to statutory time limits for lodging claims
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, contracts, letters)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30 min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 84-14.851
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 10 décembre 1985

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Builder's insurance claim barred by late notice

A builder in Lyon completed a €80,000 house extension in 2022. After a payment dispute, the homeowner filed a counterclaim in April 2023 citing water ingress defects. The builder only notified his insurer in November 2025, after the court ordered him to pay €25,000 for repairs.

Application pratique:

This case law makes clear that the two-year limitation period for the builder’s claim against his insurer started when the homeowner filed the counterclaim (April 2023), not at the court judgment. The builder should have notified his insurer immediately upon receiving the counterclaim to avoid time-bar. Always inform your insurer as soon as a defect counterclaim is raised, even if liability is not yet decided.

2

Homeowner secures insurance payout by timely counterclaim

A first-time buyer in Bordeaux hired a contractor for a €15,000 loft conversion. When the contractor sued for unpaid invoices, the buyer counterclaimed in February 2023 for defective insulation. The court awarded damages in March 2025, but the contractor’s insurer denied coverage, arguing the claim was out of time.

Application pratique:

The decision confirms the insurer’s liability is triggered by the counterclaim date, not the judgment. The homeowner should ensure the counterclaim is formally recorded and dated, as this locks in the insurer’s obligation. Here, because the counterclaim was in February 2023, the insurer remains liable even if the contractor notified them later, provided it was within two years of February 2023. Homeowners should keep proof of when they made the counterclaim.

3

Property investor inherits defect claim with voided insurance

A landlord in Marseille bought a renovated apartment for €120,000 in 2024. The previous owner had a payment dispute with the builder and made a counterclaim in June 2021 for structural defects. The builder never told his insurer. When the new owner sought repairs in 2025, the insurer refused, citing the builder’s failure to notify within two years of June 2021.

Application pratique:

Under this case law, the builder's right to insurance coverage expired two years after the counterclaim (June 2023). Before buying a renovated property, always ask if there were any defect claims or legal actions against the builder, and verify that the insurer was notified in time. Otherwise, you may be left without recourse for latent defects. In this scenario, the landlord's only remedy is against the builder directly, who may lack funds.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide