Aller au contenu principal
Nullity of a Sale of a Community Asset: Beware of the Two-Year Limitation Period
Droit-immobilier

Nullity of a Sale of a Community Asset: Beware of the Two-Year Limitation Period

📅 Décision du 15 July 1993⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 9 vues📖 7 min de lecture

When a spouse alone sells a community asset, the sale can be annulled. But the two-year period to act only runs from the signing of the final deed, not the preliminary contract. A 1993 decision of the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) that protects buyers.

Reference Decision: cc • N° 91-18.368 • 1993-07-15 • View the decision →

Imagine: you sign a preliminary contract for a house in Laxou, near Nancy. The seller, a spouse alone, promises you that his wife agrees. Then, when the time comes to execute the deed before the notary, the wife refuses. The seller tells you: "Sorry, it's too late, you had two years to sue me from the preliminary contract." Is he right? No, answers the French Supreme Court. And that's where this 1993 decision changes everything.

The question every buyer asks: when does the period for annulling a sale concluded without the consent of both spouses run? Is it from the preliminary contract or from the notarial deed? The answer determines the very possibility of obtaining redress. Because if the period has already expired, you can no longer act.

This decision of the French Supreme Court, delivered on 15 July 1993, establishes a clear rule: the two-year limitation period provided for by Article 1427 of the French Civil Code (which sanctions the spouse who exceeds his powers over a community asset) only begins to run from the day the sale becomes perfect, i.e., the signing of the final deed. Not before. An essential protection for buyers and co-owners.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr. X, owner in Laxou, operates a business with shares. He signs a preliminary contract with the Z... spouses to sell them the business and the shares. Problem: the asset is community property of the X spouses, but only Mr. X's signature appears on the preliminary contract. He promises (i.e., guarantees) that his wife and son will ratify the sale. But they refuse.

The Z... spouses then sue Mr. X for damages on the basis of Article 1120 of the French Civil Code (the promise to procure ratification: anyone who promises the ratification of a third party is liable to compensate if the third party refuses). But the Nancy Court of Appeal raises the statute of limitation: according to it, the two-year period of Article 1427 ran from the preliminary contract, and they acted too late.

The Z... spouses appeal to the French Supreme Court. Their argument: the preliminary contract being void (because it deals with a community asset without the consent of both spouses), it cannot start the limitation period. The sale only became perfect when the notarial deed should have been signed. The nullity of the preliminary contract prevents any limitation period.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The French Supreme Court quashes the Court of Appeal's decision. Its reasoning is in one sentence: "the two-year limitation period set by Article 1427 of the French Civil Code only ran from the day the sale became perfect." And it specifies: the preliminary contract, including the promise to procure ratification, was void as it concerned community assets without the wife's consent. Consequently, the period could not have started at the signing of the preliminary contract, since that deed is void.

Article 1427 of the French Civil Code provides that if a spouse exceeds his powers over a community asset (for example, sells it alone), the other spouse may seek annulment of the deed within two years from the date he became aware of the deed. But the French Supreme Court interprets this period protectively: as long as the sale is not perfect (i.e., as long as the notarial deed is not signed), the period does not run. Because before the notarial deed, there is no final sale yet. The preliminary contract is only a promise, which can be annulled without prejudice.

This decision confirms previous case law: the nullity of a legal deed cannot start a limitation period, since the void deed is deemed never to have existed. This is a logical evolution, but with major practical consequences.

What This Changes for You — Concretely

For buyers: if you sign a preliminary contract with a spouse alone, and the other spouse refuses to ratify, you have two years from the date the sale should have been finalised (the notarial deed) to act. Not a day less. Example: preliminary contract signed on 1 June 2023, deed planned for 1 September 2023, wife's refusal on 15 August 2023. You can act until 1 September 2025. If the seller tells you it's too late because the preliminary contract dates from 2023, he is wrong.

For sellers: be careful not to sign a preliminary contract alone if the asset is community property. You incur liability on the basis of the promise to procure ratification (Article 1120). Damages can be high. Take an example in Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy: a house sold for €250,000, the buyer had already sold his own property and found himself without housing. Damages can cover the loss of chance, relocation costs, etc. That is several tens of thousands of euros.

For co-owners or couples: if you are the spouse who did not consent, you can seek annulment of the deed within two years from the date you became aware of the deed. But be careful, if you let this period pass, the sale becomes final. The 1993 decision does not directly help you, but it reminds you to react quickly.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Check the matrimonial regime before any preliminary contract. Request a copy of the marriage contract or notarial deed. If the asset is community property, require both spouses' signatures on the preliminary contract. A simple mandate is not always sufficient.
  • Include a condition precedent clause. Provide that the preliminary contract is conditional upon obtaining the written consent of the other spouse within 15 days. If consent is not given, the preliminary contract is void without cost.
  • Keep all evidence of the date of signing of the notarial deed. The two-year period runs from this date. If you do not have the deed, request a copy from the notary.
  • Consult a lawyer immediately upon the first refusal. Do not let the period pass. A formal notice with acknowledgment of receipt can interrupt the limitation period. Maître Zakine can assist you quickly, even remotely.

The French Supreme Court had already held, in a decision of 11 February 1986, that the nullity of a deed for lack of consent of a spouse cannot be cured by the limitation period if the deed has not been executed. But the 1993 decision goes further by specifying the starting point of the period: the perfect sale, i.e., the notarial deed.

In a more recent decision of 4 November 2020 (No. 19-16.324), the Court recalled that the two-year period of Article 1427 runs from the date the non-consenting spouse becomes aware of the deed, not from the date of the deed. But for the buyer, it is the date of the perfect sale that counts.

The trend of the courts is therefore protective of buyers and non-consenting spouses. But be careful: if the non-consenting spouse became aware of the deed well before the perfect sale, the period may run earlier. For example, if the wife attended the signing of the preliminary contract, the period runs from that date. Caution is advised.

In Practice: What to Do

FAQ:

  1. I signed a preliminary contract with a seller alone, and his spouse now refuses. Can I still annul? Yes, if the notarial deed has not been signed. You have two years from the planned date of the notarial deed to seek annulment and/or damages.
  2. What is the risk for the seller who exceeded his powers? He may be ordered to pay damages for breach of the promise to procure ratification (Article 1120). The amount can cover the loss of chance, the buyer's expenses, etc.
  3. What if the non-consenting wife never knew about the preliminary contract? The two-year period runs from the day she becomes aware of it. If she learns of it after the sale, she can still act within two years.
  4. Can I sell a community asset alone if my spouse agrees verbally? No, the consent must be written and signed before a notary to be valid. Verbal agreement is not sufficient.
  5. What is the cost of an annulment action? Lawyer's fees vary, but an initial consultation with Maître Zakine is €45 for 30 minutes. Fees for a full procedure are generally between €1,500 and €3,000, depending on complexity.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of procedure — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

J'ai signé un compromis avec un vendeur seul, son conjoint refuse maintenant. Puis-je annuler ?

Oui, si l'acte authentique n'a pas été signé. Vous avez deux ans à compter de la date prévue pour la signature de l'acte authentique pour demander la nullité et/ou des dommages-intérêts.

Quel est le risque pour le vendeur qui a outrepassé ses pouvoirs ?

Il peut être condamné à des dommages-intérêts pour porte-fort (article 1120 du Code civil). Le montant peut couvrir la perte de chance, les frais engagés par l'acquéreur, etc.

Que faire si l'épouse non consentante n'a jamais eu connaissance du compromis ?

Le délai de deux ans court à partir du jour où elle en a connaissance. Si elle l'apprend après la vente, elle peut encore agir dans les deux ans.

Puis-je vendre un bien commun seul si mon conjoint est d'accord verbalement ?

Non, l'accord doit être écrit et signé devant notaire pour être valable. Un accord verbal ne suffit pas.

Quel est le coût d'une action en nullité ?

Les frais d'avocat varient, mais une consultation initiale avec Maître Zakine est à 45€ pour 30 minutes. Les honoraires pour une procédure complète sont généralement compris entre 1 500 et 3 000 €, selon la complexité.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 91-18.368
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 15 juillet 1993

Mots-clés

vente bien communnullité ventedélai prescriptionarticle 1427porte-fort

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Buyer of a house in Laxou: the seller was married alone

You sign a preliminary contract for a house in Laxou. The seller, Mr. X, is married under the legal community regime. His wife did not sign. She refuses to ratify. You lose the purchase and have already sold your own house.

Application pratique:

You can act within two years from the planned date of the notarial deed. Claim damages for loss of chance and relocation costs. Maître Zakine can help you quantify your loss and sue the seller.

2

Co-owner in Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy: a spouse alone sells a community unit

In a co-ownership in Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, a spouse sells a co-ownership unit without the consent of his spouse. The management company (syndic) is informed but does not react.

Application pratique:

The non-consenting spouse can seek annulment of the sale within two years from becoming aware of the deed. The management company must verify the signatures of both spouses on any sale deed. In case of doubt, it must suspend the procedure.

3

Landlord owner in Nancy: rental of a community property by one spouse alone

A landlord owner in Nancy rents a community apartment without the consent of his spouse. The tenant is in good faith.

Application pratique:

The lease may be annulled if the non-consenting spouse requests it within two years. But the tenant may claim damages from the landlord for breach of the obligation to deliver. Advise your client to check the matrimonial regime before signing a lease.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide