Aller au contenu principal
Sale of Real Estate: Which Date Should Be Used to Assess Lesion? The Answer from the Cour de cassation
Droit-immobilier

Sale of Real Estate: Which Date Should Be Used to Assess Lesion? The Answer from the Cour de cassation

📅 Décision du 30 March 2011⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 8 vues📖 8 min de lecture

The Cour de cassation clarifies that, for the rescission of a sale for lesion (sale at a price less than half the real value), the date to be used to assess the property is that of the promise to sell, even if a suspensive condition is stipulated. Important decision for sellers and buyers.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 10-13.756 • 2011-03-30 • View the decision →

Imagine: you sell your house in Gemenos, Bouches-du-Rhône, for €300,000 in 2019. The preliminary contract is signed in March, the final sale in June. In 2023, you discover that the real value of the property was €600,000 at the time of signing the preliminary contract. Can you request the annulment of the sale for lesion (sale at a price less than half the real value)? The answer depends on a crucial question: which date should be used to assess the value of the property?

This question, which hundreds of owners ask themselves every year, was decided by the Cour de cassation in a judgment of 30 March 2011 (No. 10-13.756). The judges set a clear rule: it is the date of the meeting of the minds, i.e., that of the promise to sell (or preliminary contract), which must be used to assess the lesion. Even if a suspensive condition (for example, obtaining a loan) delays the final sale, the key moment remains that of the preliminary contract.

But what exactly does this change for you, whether you are a seller, buyer or real estate professional in Marseille or elsewhere? Let us delve into this decision and its practical implications.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

In 1994, the SCI Locosa and a seller, Mr X, signed a promise to sell relating to a building in Marseille. The agreed price was 1,000,000 francs (approximately €152,000). The sale was subject to a classic suspensive condition (a condition on which the performance of the contract depends): obtaining a loan by the buyer. The condition was fulfilled, and the sale was completed by formal deed (notarial deed) a few months later.

But years later, the seller considered that the price was far too low. He sued SCI Locosa to obtain rescission of the sale for lesion. In law, lesion is a defect of the contract allowing the seller to request the annulment of the sale if he sold real estate for a price less than 7/12 (i.e., more than half) of its real value at the time of the sale (Article 1674 of the Civil Code).

The problem? The value of the property had increased significantly between the signing of the promise to sell (1994) and the formal sale (1995). The seller argued that the date to be used to assess the value was that of the formal deed, while the buyer (the SCI) argued that it was that of the promise to sell. The Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the buyer, and the seller appealed to the Cour de cassation.

Before the Cour de cassation, the seller argued that Article 1675 of the Civil Code provides that lesion is assessed 'at the time of the sale', and that the sale is only perfected upon signature of the formal deed, especially in the presence of a suspensive condition. In short, as long as the condition is not fulfilled, there would be no definitive sale. But the Cour de cassation rejected this argument.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Cour de cassation upheld the decision of the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal by holding that 'the time of the sale' referred to in Article 1675 of the Civil Code corresponds to the meeting of the minds on the essential elements of the contract: the thing (the property) and the price. In other words, as soon as the seller and the buyer have agreed on the property and the price, the sale is considered concluded in principle, even if it is subject to suspensive conditions.

The judges highlighted two particularities of the case: firstly, the promise to sell provided for full payment of the price upon its signature (and not the usual 10% deposit), and secondly, the suspensive condition was already fulfilled at the time of the legal claim. These elements reinforced the idea that the parties' intention was definitively fixed at the time of the promise to sell.

However, note: the Court does not say that any promise to sell is equivalent to a definitive sale. It specifies that it is the date of the meeting of the minds that matters, which normally corresponds to the date of the promise to sell, even in the presence of a suspensive condition. In doing so, the Cour de cassation follows a consistent line of case law that favours the date of formation of the contract rather than that of its performance.

What few people know: this rule applies equally to lesion and to other actions such as a claim for nullity for defect of consent (mistake, fraud). undefined, I have encountered cases where sellers tried to rely on an increase in value between the promise to sell and the formal deed to request rescission. This decision closes that door.

What This Changes for You — Practically

For sellers: if you believe you sold at too low a price, you must act quickly. The time limit to bring an action for rescission for lesion is two years from the sale (Article 1676 of the Civil Code). But this time limit runs from the date of the promise to sell, not the formal deed. Concrete example: if you sign a promise to sell on 1 March 2023 and the formal deed on 1 June 2023, you have until 1 March 2025 to act, not until June. In Marseille, where sale times can be long (obtaining a loan, surveys), this difference is crucial.

For buyers: you are protected against a lesion action that would occur several years after signing the promise to sell, because the starting point is fixed at the promise to sell. However, if you paid a price far below the real value on the day of the promise to sell, the seller can still act within two years. So be careful not to underestimate the value of the property at the time of the agreement.

For real estate professionals: this decision obliges you to advise your clients on the risks of lesion as soon as the promise to sell is signed. If you are involved in a transaction in Marseille or Gemenos, where prices can vary rapidly, it is essential to inform the seller that the value to be used is that of the day of the promise to sell, not the formal deed. A failure to inform could trigger your professional liability.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Have the property valued by a real estate expert before signing the promise to sell. A professional valuation will allow you to know whether the proposed price is in line with the market. In Marseille, price differences between neighbourhoods can be significant (e.g., €3,000/m² in the 8th arrondissement versus €5,000/m² in the 7th). Do not rely on a single online estimate.
  • Include a price revision clause in the promise to sell. If a long period separates the promise to sell from the formal deed, you can provide that the price will be revised according to the evolution of an index (e.g., the reference rent index). This will prevent the seller from feeling aggrieved by a price increase.
  • Keep all evidence of the value of the property on the day of the promise to sell. If you are a buyer, keep proof (advertisements, valuation opinions, photos) demonstrating that the price was in line with the market. In case of a dispute, these elements will be valuable.
  • Consult a lawyer specialised in real estate law before signing. A professional can identify problematic clauses and advise you on the risks of lesion. A 30-minute consultation (€45 with Maître Zakine) can save you years of litigation.

This 2011 decision is part of a line of Cour de cassation judgments favouring the date of formation of the contract. One can cite a judgment of 3 November 2004 (No. 02-18.998) in which the Court had already held that, for the assessment of lesion, the date to be used was that of the promise to sell, even if the sale was subject to a suspensive condition. The 2011 decision confirms this direction.

However, a more recent decision of the Cour de cassation of 13 January 2021 (No. 19-20.540) introduced a nuance: if the suspensive condition is not fulfilled, the promise is void and there is no sale. In that case, lesion cannot be invoked. In other words, the promise to sell is the starting point only if the sale actually goes through.

This development shows that the courts seek to secure transactions while protecting the parties against abuse. The trend is clear: it is the initial agreement that counts, to avoid unpredictable price variations from calling into question sales concluded in good faith.

In Practice: What You Need to Do

FAQ:

1. I am a seller, I signed a promise to sell in 2022 and the formal deed in 2023. Can I still take action for lesion?
Yes, if you sold for less than half the real value on the day of the promise to sell. You have two years from the signing of the promise to sell. If you signed it in January 2022, the deadline expires at the end of January 2024. Act quickly!

2. What should I do if I think I have been prejudiced?
Consult a lawyer immediately. You will need an expert appraisal to establish the value of the property on the day of the promise to sell. Then, a court summons must be issued before the expiry of the two-year period.

3. Can the buyer also invoke lesion?
No, lesion is a protection granted only to the seller of a building (Article 1674 of the Civil Code). The buyer cannot request rescission for lesion, but he can act for hidden defects or fraud if the property has defects.

4. What is the cost of an action for rescission for lesion?
Costs include lawyer's fees (often several thousand euros), expert fees (€1,000 to €5,000) and court costs. But if you win, you can obtain damages. A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) will allow you to assess your chances.

5. Can I avoid lesion by setting a price in the promise to sell close to the real value?
Exactly. The best prevention is to have the property valued by a professional and set a sale price accordingly. If the price is fair, lesion is not possible.

In Practice: What You Need to Do

Checklist for the Seller:

  1. Have the property valued by a real estate expert before signing the promise to sell.
  2. Keep the written valuation and any document proving the value (advertisements, valuation opinions).
  3. If the price seems too low, do not sign the promise to sell without consulting a lawyer.
  4. If in doubt after the sale, act within two years following the promise to sell.

Checklist for the Buyer:

  1. Check that the price in the promise to sell is consistent with the market to avoid a future lesion action.
  2. Keep a copy of the promise to sell and all exchanges regarding the price.
  3. If the seller threatens you with a lesion action, consult a lawyer to know your rights.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Quelle est la date à retenir pour apprécier la lésion dans une vente immobilière ?

La Cour de cassation a jugé que c'est la date de la promesse de vente (compromis), même en présence d'une condition suspensive, car c'est à ce moment que les parties se sont accordées sur la chose et le prix.

Puis-je demander l'annulation d'une vente pour lésion si le prix a augmenté entre le compromis et l'acte authentique ?

Non, car la valeur du bien est appréciée au jour du compromis. Si le prix était déjà inférieur de plus de la moitié à cette date, vous pouvez agir, mais dans les deux ans suivant le compromis.

Quel est le délai pour agir en rescision pour lésion ?

Le délai est de deux ans à compter de la vente, mais la vente s'entend de la date du compromis selon cette jurisprudence. Il faut donc agir dans les deux ans suivant la signature du compromis.

Que faire si je pense avoir vendu mon bien à un prix trop bas ?

Consultez immédiatement un avocat spécialisé. Il vous faudra une expertise pour établir la valeur au jour du compromis et agir en justice avant l'expiration du délai de deux ans.

L'acquéreur peut-il se prévaloir de la lésion ?

Non, la lésion est une protection exclusive du vendeur d'un immeuble. L'acquéreur ne peut pas demander la rescision pour lésion, mais peut agir pour vice caché ou dol.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 10-13.756
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 30 mars 2011

Mots-clés

lésionvente immobilièrecompromis de ventecondition suspensiveCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Seller in Marseille: lesion action after a price increase

Mr Dupont sells his flat in the 7th arrondissement of Marseille for €200,000 in 2021 (promise to sell in March, deed in June). In 2023, he discovers that the real value at the time of the promise to sell was €450,000. He can request rescission for lesion because the price was less than half.

Application pratique:

Mr Dupont must act before March 2023 (2 years after the promise to sell). He must obtain a property valuation to prove the value on the day of the promise to sell, then sue the buyer. With a lawyer, he will obtain either cancellation of the sale or a price supplement.

2

Buyer in Gemenos: securing your purchase against a lesion action

Mrs Martin buys a house in Gemenos for €300,000 (promise to sell in September 2022, deed in December 2022). In 2024, the seller sues her for lesion, arguing that the value was €650,000 on the day of the promise to sell.

Application pratique:

Mrs Martin must demonstrate that the price was in line with the market. She can produce valuations from local estate agents, comparable advertisements, and argue that the promise to sell provided for full payment of the price, reinforcing the meeting of the minds. A specialised lawyer can challenge the opposing expert report.

3

Real estate professional in Marseille: duty to advise

A Marseille estate agent drafts a promise to sell for a property at €500,000. He does not inform the seller that lesion is assessed on the day of the promise to sell. The property was worth €1,100,000 on that date. The seller sues for lesion and holds the agent liable.

Application pratique:

The agent should have advised the seller to have the property valued before signing. To avoid such disputes, he must now systematically inform his seller clients of the case law rule and recommend a prior valuation. In case of failure, his professional civil liability may be engaged.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide