Latent Defect: An Intermediate Seller May Be Ordered to Pay Everything, but Can They Recover from the Manufacturer?

Imagine: you have just bought a flat in Cannes, sea view, everything seems perfect. But three months later, damp rises from the walls, mould spreads through the rooms. The expert speaks of a latent defect: a fault in the external cladding, installed by the company that renovated the building before the sale. You sue the seller, who himself had bought the property from a developer. The seller is ordered to compensate you. But can he recover from the manufacturer of the cladding? And can the latter limit its liability? This is precisely the question decided by the Court of Cassation in this decision of 6 January 2021.

The question every owner or property professional asks: in the case of successive sales, can the intermediate seller (the one who resells without having manufactured) claim from the manufacturer the full amount he had to pay to the final buyer? And can the manufacturer raise arguments to pay less?

This decision provides a nuanced answer: yes, the intermediate seller can claim an indemnity from the manufacturer on the same basis (latent defect), but the manufacturer can raise its own defences to limit its liability, such as the unforeseeable nature of the damage. Judges must examine these defences, not brush them aside.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

Mr X, owner of a flat in Le Cannet, discovers after his purchase that the terrace has a waterproofing defect. Water seeps in, damaging the structure. He sues the seller, the company DMO, on the basis of the guarantee against latent defects (articles 1641 et seq. of the Civil Code). DMO is ordered to pay him €50,000 in damages. But DMO did not build the terrace: it had bought it from the company TBN, the manufacturer. DMO therefore brings a third-party claim against TBN (article 334 of the Code of Civil Procedure), seeking full reimbursement.

The Court of Appeal, in an initial judgment, orders TBN to indemnify DMO in full. TBN appeals to the Court of Cassation: it accepts the principle of its liability, but argues that it should only guarantee damages that were foreseeable at the date of the sale, and that the damage was unforeseeable. The Court of Appeal, in a judgment setting aside its earlier decision, refuses to set aside the initial judgment, merely stating that the intermediate seller can exercise its claim for an indemnity against the manufacturer up to the full amount of the award. The Court of Cassation quashes this judgment: the Court of Appeal should have examined TBN's defence on the limitation of its liability.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation recalls the relevant texts: article 1641 of the Civil Code defines a latent defect (a defect that renders the property unfit for use or so diminishes its use that the buyer would not have bought it, or would have bought it at a lower price, had he known of it). Article 1645 provides that a seller who knew of the defects is liable for all damages. But for the intermediate seller, it is different: he is presumed to be in good faith (article 1643). If he is condemned, he can recover from his own seller or the manufacturer via a third-party claim (articles 334 and 335 of the Code of Civil Procedure).

But note: the manufacturer may be considered a professional seller, deemed to know of defects (article 1645). He is therefore liable for all damages, unless he proves that the damage was unforeseeable or that the intermediate buyer was at fault. In this case, TBN argued that the damage was unforeseeable. The Court of Appeal refused to examine this defence, stating that the third-party claim covered the full amount. The Court of Cassation says: no, you must examine this defence. If the manufacturer proves unforeseeability, its liability may be limited to the sale price or a lower amount.

In other words, this decision does not create new law, but it reminds us of an essential procedural rule: the judge must respond to all the parties' arguments. undefined that the intermediate seller is not guaranteed to recover 100% of the sums paid. He must anticipate that the manufacturer may limit its liability.

What This Changes for You — Concretely

For a buyer-owner (like Mr X): if you discover a latent defect, you can sue your direct seller, even if he is not the manufacturer. But if that seller is insolvent, you will struggle to recover. So check the financial solidity of the seller before buying, or require a guarantee.

For a landlord: if you let a property and the tenant discovers a defect, you will be liable. If you recently bought the property, you can theoretically recover from the seller, but this decision requires you to check whether the manufacturer can limit its liability. For example, in Le Cannet, a landlord had to repay €12,000 in rent to his tenant for a latent defect (water ingress). He sued his seller, but the manufacturer argued unforeseeability. Without this decision, the landlord might have recovered everything; now, he risks recovering only the sale price.

For a property professional (agent, developer, property trader): if you are an intermediate seller, you must systematically bring a third-party claim against your own seller or the manufacturer, but you must also anticipate that the latter may limit its liability. undefined, I have seen cases where the manufacturer invoked a limitation of liability clause in its general terms. So you must check the contracts in advance.

For a manufacturer: this decision protects you: you can argue unforeseeability of the damage or other defences to limit your liability. However, proving unforeseeability is difficult. Keep all technical studies, applicable standards, etc.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Have a technical survey carried out before buying: for an older property, an expert inspection (e.g., thermography, waterproofing test) can reveal potential latent defects. Cost: €500 to €2,000, but it can save you tens of thousands of euros in repairs.
• Include a guarantee clause in your sale contract: if you are selling a property you recently acquired, mention that you reserve the right to bring a third-party claim against your own seller. This will facilitate the process.
• Keep all invoices and contracts: in the event of a defect, you will need to prove the chain of sales. Keep the deed of sale, invoices for works, decennial guarantees, etc.
• Insure with a lawyer company: a 'legal protection' or 'structural defects' insurance policy can cover legal costs. Check limits and exclusions.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This decision is part of a series of recent rulings by the Court of Cassation that strengthen the rights of manufacturers. For example, in a decision of 13 February 2020 (No. 18-26.621), the Court held that the manufacturer can argue against the intermediate seller that the defect was apparent to the final buyer, thereby limiting its liability. Conversely, in a decision of 10 June 2015 (No. 14-16.897), the Court had rather protected the final buyer by broadening the concept of latent defect.

The current trend is therefore towards a balance: the intermediate seller must prove that the manufacturer was at fault, but the manufacturer can defend itself by arguing unforeseeability. In future, we can expect the courts to be more demanding on proof of unforeseeability, especially in technical sectors (construction, electronics).

Summary and Next Steps

Here is a checklist of what to do if you are faced with a latent defect:

1. Record the defect: take photos, commission a bailiff's report, gather witness statements.
2. Inform your seller by registered letter: within 2 years of discovering the defect (limitation period for the action on latent defects, article 1648 of the Civil Code).
3. Obtain an expert report: request a judicial or amicable expert report to establish the nature and extent of the defect.
4. Issue proceedings: if the seller refuses to settle, bring an action before the judicial court. Do not forget to bring third-party claims against all successive sellers.
5. Prepare your arguments: if you are the intermediate seller, anticipate the manufacturer's defences (unforeseeability, limitation clause, etc.) and gather counter-evidence.

FAQ:

• Can I sue the manufacturer directly if I bought from an intermediate seller? No, you have a contractual relationship only with your direct seller. You must sue him, and he will then recover from the manufacturer.
• What is the time limit to act? Two years from the discovery of the defect, but at most 20 years after the sale (absolute limit).
• What if the intermediate seller is insolvent? You can try to sue the manufacturer directly on the basis of tort liability (article 1240 of the Civil Code), but this is more difficult.
• Does this decision apply to sales between private individuals? Yes, a private seller is presumed to be in good faith, but he can be ordered to refund the price and pay repair costs.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →