Aller au contenu principal
Breach of trust by a managing agent
Droit Immobilier

Breach of trust by a managing agent

📅 Decision of 12 November 1985🔄 Updated on 6 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 35 views📖 2 min read

A managing agent of a condominium who, in breach of the provisions of Article 1993 of the Civil Code, fails to account to the principal for all that he has received under his power of attorney commits a breach of trust.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 84-90.548 • 1985-11-12 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it means for you.

The situation

A managing agent of a condominium who, in breach of the provisions of Article 1993 of the Civil Code, fails to account to the principal for all that he has received under his power of attorney commits a breach of trust.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Scrupulously observe the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 84-90.548
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 12 November 1985

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Practical use cases

1

Condominium owner suspects managing agent's missing accounts

Sophie, an owner-occupier in a 20-unit condominium in Lyon, has not received annual financial statements from the managing agent for two years, despite paying €2,400 yearly service charges. The agent blames 'administrative delays' but has provided no breakdown of where the money went.

Practical application:

The Court of Cassation confirms that a managing agent's failure to render accounts constitutes breach of trust. Sophie should send a formal registered letter demanding a full accounting within 15 days, citing this ruling. If ignored, she can file a criminal complaint with the public prosecutor and rally other co-owners to seek reimbursement through civil proceedings. She should also press for the agent's removal at the next general meeting.

2

Landlord's property manager hides rental income details

Mark, a British expat landlord in Paris, employs a management agency to handle three rental flats generating €4,200 monthly. After 18 months without a financial report, he discovers two tenants were evicted for non-payment—yet the agent never forwarded the rent collected earlier, nor explained €8,000 in withheld 'repair costs'.

Practical application:

The decision clarifies that a property manager's deliberate failure to account for received funds is a criminal breach of trust. Mark must immediately demand a complete statement of all transactions since the start, specifying a 10-day deadline. He should also notify the agency's professional body and consider reporting the agent to the police. To prevent recurrence, he should amend the management contract to require monthly digital reporting with bank transaction records.

3

First-time buyer uncovers mismanaged repair levy funds

After purchasing her first flat in Nice, Emma learns that the condominium's managing agent collected a special levy of €12,000 per unit for roof repairs, but the work was never done and the funds are unaccounted for. The agent avoids providing a detailed breakdown, leaving owners in the dark.

Practical application:

Under this case law, the agent's refusal to render accounts for the levy fund is a clear breach of trust. Emma should act quickly: call a general meeting to demand the agent's dismissal and the appointment of a new syndic, jointly commission an audit of the condominium's accounts, and prepare a collective criminal complaint. As limitation periods apply, she must not delay—the clock starts from when the omission was discovered.

Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide