Aller au contenu principal
Subject to cassation: decision of a
Droit Immobilier

Subject to cassation: decision of a

📅 Decision of 04 February 1998🔄 Updated on 18 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 24 views📖 2 min read

A decision of a court of appeal is liable to be quashed which declares inadmissible the civil action of an owner against a builder, convicted for having failed to take out the insurance policies required by articles L. 111-28 to L. 111-30 of the Construction and Housing Code, without investigating whether, by depriving the owner of the security provided by the insurance in anticipation of losses which he had to bear the cost of, the defendant did not cause him to lose a serious chance of compensation and thus caused damage meeting the definition given by article 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (1).

Reference decision: cc • N° 97-80.841 • 1998-02-04 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A decision of a court of appeal is liable to be quashed which declares inadmissible the civil action of an owner against a builder, convicted for having failed to take out the insurance policies required by articles L. 111-28 to L. 111-30 of the Construction and Housing Code, without investigating whether, by depriving the owner of the security provided by the insurance in anticipation of losses which he had to bear the cost of, the defendant did not cause him to lose a serious chance of compensation and thus caused damage meeting the definition given by article 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (1).

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, contracts, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 97-80.841
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 04 February 1998

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide