Aller au contenu principal
Except where it accompanies a
Droit Immobilier

Except where it accompanies a

📅 Decision of 14 September 2006🔄 Updated on 4 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 views📖 2 min read

Except where it accompanies a decision that is already enforceable, the penalty payment takes effect on a date which cannot be earlier than the day on which the decision imposing the obligation was notified. Therefore, the Court of Appeal breaches Article 51 of Decree No. 92-755 of 31 December 1992, together with Article 503 of the New Code of Civil Procedure, when it gives effect to a penalty payment ordered by a case management judge from the date of the order, even though that order provided that the penalty payment would run from its date.

Reference decision: cc • No. 05-15.370 • 2006-09-14 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Except where it accompanies a decision that is already enforceable, the penalty payment takes effect on a date which cannot be earlier than the day on which the decision imposing the obligation was notified. Therefore, the Court of Appeal breaches Article 51 of Decree No. 92-755 of 31 December 1992, together with Article 503 of the New Code of Civil Procedure, when it gives effect to a penalty payment ordered by a case management judge from the date of the order, even though that order provided that the penalty payment would run from its date.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 05-15.370
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 14 September 2006

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide