The employment contract of an employee of the

Practical application:

The court ruling in Cass. No. 14-12.072 confirms that the caretaker's employment contract is not an appendix to the general meeting minutes, so the managing agent is not obliged to disclose it under Decree No. 67-223. Marie cannot force disclosure through a demand for annexes; she must seek other evidence of mismanagement (e.g., budget reports, minutes discussing salary). She should raise her concerns at the next AGM and propose a vote to review the contract.

Practical application:

Relying on Cass. No. 14-12.072, you can lawfully refuse because the employment contract is not a mandatory annex to the minutes under Decree No. 67-223. Respond in writing, citing the ruling and explaining that the contract contains personal data protected by privacy laws. Advise the co-owner to raise the issue at the next general meeting if he has concerns about the caretaker's duties or remuneration. This avoids litigation and protects you from a court order.

Practical application:

According to Cass. No. 14-12.072, the caretaker's employment contract is not part of the mandatory documents available to prospective buyers. Instead, Jean can review the co-ownership's budget and the minutes to see caretaker-related expenses. He should also ask the seller if there were any recent disputes about caretaker costs. If concerned, he can contact the managing agent directly to ask about the caretaker's role and standard costs, without having a right to the contract itself.