The judge in chambers seised of a

Practical application:

The 1978 decision confirms that a judge can grant summary eviction based on an express forfeiture clause, even if the subtenant argues the lease was fraudulent. Here, the subtenant's lack of registration is a clear breach. Serve formal notice to the tenant to remedy the breach within one month; if unmet, apply to the tribunal judiciaire's judge in chambers for eviction. Keep copies of the lease, the forfeiture clause, and proof of subtenancy without consent and non-registration.

Practical application:

This case law shows that your lack of registration can lead to a swift eviction order without a full trial, even if you claim the head lease was structured to avoid commercial lease protections. You should immediately apply for commercial registration and negotiate with the landlord to regularise your position, perhaps by offering a direct lease. Seek legal advice to challenge the forfeiture if the landlord knew or should have known of the subletting and accepted rent, as this might create a serious dispute preventing summary judgment.

Practical application:

Before completing the purchase, you can use this case law to demand that the seller evict the subtenant via summary proceedings. If the seller refuses, negotiate a purchase price reduction reflecting the risk and costs of eviction. After acquisition, if you become the landlord, immediately serve a forfeiture notice on the tenant for unauthorised subletting and the subtenant's non-registration, then apply to the judge in chambers for eviction as per the 1978 decision. Ensure you have all documents proving the breaches.