When the appeal formulates no

Practical application:

Because the appeal does not criticise the part of the ruling affecting Jean, under this case law Jean must be removed from the proceedings. The landlord should immediately file a motion to dismiss Jean from the appeal to avoid procedural delays and extra costs. The appeal will then proceed only against Marie. To prevent this situation, always ensure your appeal explicitly states which parts of the decision you contest for each defendant.

Practical application:

Since Marie's appeal included no criticism of the decision regarding the estate agent, the agent must be removed from the appeal proceedings according to this precedent. Marie should formally notify the court that she does not intend to pursue the agent further; this clarifies the scope of the appeal, saves time and legal fees, and avoids involving the agent unnecessarily. She must focus her appeal grounds solely on the seller's liability.

Practical application:

This case law means the owners, whose part of the decision is not attacked, must be removed from the appeal. The co-ownership's lawyer should promptly request the court to discontinue the appeal against those three owners. This prevents the owners from incurring legal costs for an appeal that does not concern them and avoids potential claims for abusive procedure. All appeal submissions must be strictly confined to the contractor's liability.