Aller au contenu principal
Do not appear on the list of
Droit Immobilier

Do not appear on the list of

📅 Decision of 09 March 2005🔄 Updated on 4 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 views📖 2 min read

Do not appear on the list of recoverable service charges exhaustively listed by decree the financing and depreciation costs of heating and domestic hot water supply installations in a residential building. Thereupon, a Court of Appeal: - correctly holds that the arrangement whereby the tenants of a collective building bear the financing or repayment costs of the price of the heating installations belonging to the company with which they were personally required, under the terms of their lease, to enter into a heat supply contract constitutes an evasion of a mandatory statutory provision (judgment no. 1) ;. - correctly infers that the tenants of a property complex do not have to bear the repayment of the investment and depreciation costs of major equipment incurred by a company that had been instructed by the lessor to supply them with heating and domestic hot water and to collect directly from them the charges that it invoiced them (judgment no. 2).

Reference decision: cc • No. 01-18.039 • 2005-03-09 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Do not appear on the list of recoverable service charges exhaustively listed by decree the financing and depreciation costs of heating and domestic hot water supply installations in a residential building. Thereupon, a Court of Appeal: - correctly holds that the arrangement whereby the tenants of a collective building bear the financing or repayment costs of the price of the heating installations belonging to the company with which they were personally required, under the terms of their lease, to enter into a heat supply contract constitutes an evasion of a mandatory statutory provision (judgment no. 1) ;. - correctly infers that the tenants of a property complex do not have to bear the repayment of the investment and depreciation costs of major equipment incurred by a company that had been instructed by the lessor to supply them with heating and domestic hot water and to collect directly from them the charges that it invoiced them (judgment no. 2).

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 01-18.039
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 09 March 2005

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide