Aller au contenu principal
Seised by a lessee of premises
Droit Immobilier

Seised by a lessee of premises

📅 Decision of 16 June 2010🔄 Updated on 6 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 40 views📖 2 min read

Seised by a lessee of commercial premises with a claim for compensation against those responsible for a loss affecting the leased premises, a court of appeal which finds that for several years no business had been operated on the premises, that the equipment present in the premises dated from a previous operation which had ceased several years earlier, that no development project of any kind was under way or about to commence, and that the lessee did not establish any real intention to resume the activity of its business, may, without infringing the principle of full compensation, apply a depreciation factor to the equipment present in the premises before the occurrence of the loss, holding that otherwise the lessee would benefit from unjust enrichment.

Reference decision: cc • No. 09-13.156 • 2010-06-16 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Seised by a lessee of commercial premises with a claim for compensation against those responsible for a loss affecting the leased premises, a court of appeal which finds that for several years no business had been operated on the premises, that the equipment present in the premises dated from a previous operation which had ceased several years earlier, that no development project of any kind was under way or about to commence, and that the lessee did not establish any real intention to resume the activity of its business, may, without infringing the principle of full compensation, apply a depreciation factor to the equipment present in the premises before the occurrence of the loss, holding that otherwise the lessee would benefit from unjust enrichment.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 09-13.156
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 16 June 2010

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide