Aller au contenu principal
Owners' Association: A Non-Professional Even with a Professional Managing Agent
Droit-immobilier

Owners' Association: A Non-Professional Even with a Professional Managing Agent

📅 Decision of 25 November 2015⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 26 views📖 6 min read

The Court of Cassation has ruled that the owners' association retains its status as a non-professional for the purposes of consumer law, even when represented by a professional managing agent. A key decision that protects co-owners against unfair terms.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 14-21.873 • 2015-11-25 • View the decision →

Imagine the scene: you own a flat in Argelès-sur-Mer, in a seaside residence. The managing agent, a large professional company, imposes a sudden increase in service charges, or an unfair term in the management contract. You ask yourself: "As a co-ownership, are we considered professionals or consumers?" The answer is not trivial: if the owners' association is a professional, it cannot invoke the protection of consumer law against unfair terms. But if it is a non-professional, then articles such as Article L. 136-1 of the French Consumer Code (which allows unfair terms to be deemed unwritten) apply. The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 25 November 2015, ruled: the owners' association does not lose its status as a non-professional, even if represented by a professional managing agent. A breath of fresh air for co-owners!

But concretely, what does this decision mean for you, an owner in Le Barcarès or elsewhere? Let's decode this case and its practical implications together.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr and Mrs Dupont have owned a flat in Argelès-sur-Mer since 2005. Their co-ownership is managed by IFT Immobilier, a reputable professional managing agent. In 2012, the managing agent proposed a new management contract including "exceptional" administration fees for sending reminder letters, charged at €20 per letter. The owners' association, represented by its management committee, contested these fees as abusive. The dispute concerned the validity of the term: could the association invoke the legislation on unfair terms? IFT argued that the association, represented by a professional, could not be considered a non-professional.

The case went to the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Perpignan, then to the Cour d'Appel of Montpellier. The Cour d'Appel ruled in favour of the managing agent: in its view, the owners' association, by entrusting its management to a professional managing agent, acted in a professional context and could not benefit from the protection of the Consumer Code. The association appealed to the Court of Cassation.

On 25 November 2015, the Court of Cassation quashed the appeal judgment. It held that the owners' association, a private legal entity, does not act in a professional capacity. The fact of being represented by a professional managing agent does not strip it of its status as a non-professional. In short, the association remains a "consumer" within the meaning of consumer law.

The Reasoning of the Court — Deconstructed

The Court of Cassation relied on Article L. 136-1 of the French Consumer Code (now contained in Article L. 212-1), which deems unfair terms unwritten in contracts concluded between a professional and a non-professional or a consumer. The question was: is the owners' association a "non-professional"?

The Court recalled that the status of non-professional is assessed with regard to the activity of the legal entity: the association has no professional activity; it manages the common parts on behalf of the co-owners, who are themselves consumers. The professional managing agent is merely an agent (representative); it does not act in its own name but on behalf of the association. In other words, the association does not "professionalise" its mission by entrusting its management to a professional.

What few people know is that this decision is part of a trend protecting consumers. The Court of Cassation had already ruled, in a judgment of 26 March 2008 (No. 06-18.508), that an association of co-owners could rely on the legislation on unfair terms. Here, it confirms and clarifies: even with a professional managing agent, the association remains non-professional.

However, note that this protection only covers unfair terms in the management contract or contracts concluded by the association with third parties (suppliers, contractors). It does not affect the validity of general meeting decisions.

What This Changes for You — Concretely

If you are a co-owner, this decision is a powerful weapon against unfair terms imposed by your managing agent. For example, reminder fees of €20 per letter, formal notice fees of €50, or terms imposing disproportionate penalties for late payment: all of these can be challenged as unfair.

If you are a landlord owner in Le Barcarès, and your managing agent charges you "exceptional" fees for simply consulting a quote, know that the association can take action. In practice, I have seen cases where co-ownerships have recovered several thousand euros after having unfair terms annulled.

For tenants, this case law has an indirect impact: if service charges are reduced due to the annulment of unfair terms, your landlord may pass on the reduction to your rental charges, especially if charges are provisioned.

If you are a buyer, check before purchasing whether the management contract contains potentially unfair terms. An association that has already won a case on this ground is a guarantee of good management.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Have your management contract examined by a lawyer specialising in consumer law or co-ownership law. An unfair term can be annulled even years after signing.
  • Mobilise the management committee. It can alert you to questionable terms. Do not hesitate to ask questions at the general meeting.
  • Keep all documents. Management contract, amendments, invoices, minutes of general meetings: everything can be useful in the event of a dispute.
  • Do not accept fees without justification. All fees must be provided for in the contract and correspond to an actual service. If in doubt, ask for a written explanation.

Before the 2015 decision, some courts of appeal considered that the association, as a legal entity managed by a professional, acted in a professional context. But the Court of Cassation put an end to this restrictive interpretation. In a more recent judgment of 14 March 2019 (No. 17-22.304), it held that the owners' association can also invoke the two-year limitation period provided for by the Consumer Code for unfair terms, further strengthening its protection.

This trend is consistent: judges protect consumers, even when they are organised as a legal entity. However, note that the concept of "non-professional" should not be confused with that of "consumer" (natural person). But the result is the same: the association can benefit from the protective provisions of the Consumer Code.

Checklist Before Taking Action

  • Who can act? The owners' association, represented by its managing agent (even a professional) or by an authorised co-owner.
  • What is the deadline? To challenge an unfair term, you have a period of two years from the discovery of the term. After this period, the term is deemed unwritten, but it is safer to act quickly.
  • What is the cost? Legal action costs between €1,500 and €3,000 in lawyers' fees, but can yield much more if unfair fees are refunded.
  • How to prove the unfairness? The term must create a significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties. For example, a term allowing the managing agent to unilaterally modify its fees would be unfair.
  • What if the managing agent refuses to negotiate? Refer the matter to the judicial court. If you win, the term will be deemed unwritten and any sums unduly collected must be refunded.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat copropriété & ASL  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 14-21.873
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 25 November 2015

Keywords

syndicat des copropriétairesclause abusivenon-professionnelsyndic professionneldroit de la consommation

Practical use cases

1

Co-owner challenging abusive management fees

Mr Martin, a co-owner in Argelès-sur-Mer, receives a bill for €200 for reminder fees for 10 letters. The management contract provides for €20 per reminder letter. He considers these fees abusive.

Practical application:

Mr Martin can refer the matter to the management committee to challenge the term. If the term is found to be unfair, it will be deemed unwritten and the €200 must be refunded. It is advisable to consult a lawyer specialising in co-ownership law.

2

Landlord owner suffering excessive service charges

Mrs Durand, a landlord owner in Le Barcarès, sees her service charges increase by 30% due to exceptional management fees imposed by the managing agent. She cannot pass on this increase to her tenant.

Practical application:

Mrs Durand can ask the association to challenge these fees. If the association obtains the annulment of the unfair terms, charges will decrease, improving her rental profitability. She must act quickly to avoid losing her investment.

3

Buyer checking the management contract before purchase

Mr and Mrs Leroy wish to buy a flat in Perpignan. Their notary advises them to check the co-ownership's management contract for any unfair terms.

Practical application:

The Leroys can request a copy of the management contract and have it examined by a lawyer. If unfair terms are identified, they can negotiate a reduction in the purchase price or require the seller to obtain their annulment before signing.

Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide