Aller au contenu principal
Any clause contrary to
Droit Immobilier

Any clause contrary to

📅 Decision of 11 June 1992🔄 Updated on 11 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 19 views📖 2 min read

Any clause contrary to the provisions of Article 36 of the Decree of 17 March 1967, which sets interest on sums owed to the co-ownership association by a co-owner at the statutory rate in civil matters, from a formal notice by the property manager, shall be deemed void; this provision only allows the total exclusion of interest. The Court of Appeal legally justified its decision when, faced with a clause in the co-ownership regulations stipulating that unpaid sums would bear interest at the rate of advances on securities granted by the Banque de France, it applied the statutory rate to the interest due to the co-ownership association as from respectively the date of the claim for payment and an additional claim.

Reference decision: cc • No. 90-18.767 • 11 June 1992 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Any clause contrary to the provisions of Article 36 of the Decree of 17 March 1967, which sets interest on sums owed to the co-ownership association by a co-owner at the statutory rate in civil matters, from a formal notice by the property manager, shall be deemed void; this provision only allows the total exclusion of interest. The Court of Appeal legally justified its decision when, faced with a clause in the co-ownership regulations stipulating that unpaid sums would bear interest at the rate of advances on securities granted by the Banque de France, it applied the statutory rate to the interest due to the co-ownership association as from respectively the date of the claim for payment and an additional claim.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory appeal deadlines
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 90-18.767
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 11 June 1992

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide