Droit Foncier

Pre-emption: No Obligation of Retrocession and No Disproportionate Interference

📅 Décision du 06 October 2016⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 2 vues📖 2 min de lecture

The Court of Appeal lawfully justified its decision to dismiss the claim for damages brought by the former owner of a pre-empted plot of land, holding that no provision of the Planning Code then applicable required the holder of the pre-emption right and the successive purchasers to offer the retrocession of the pre-empted property, and that no fault on the part of those successive owners was established. It further noted that the initial owner of the land had taken the initiative to transfer it, which renders inoperative the examination of or response to submissions alleging a disproportionate interference, within the meaning of Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, with his right to respect for his property, constituted by the loss of the added value generated by the pre-empted land.

Reference decision: cc • No. 15-25.154 • 2016-10-06 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The Court of Appeal lawfully justified its decision to dismiss the claim for damages brought by the former owner of a pre-empted plot of land, holding that no provision of the Planning Code then applicable required the holder of the pre-emption right and the successive purchasers to offer the retrocession of the pre-empted property, and that no fault on the part of those successive owners was established. It further noted that the initial owner of the land had taken the initiative to transfer it, which renders inoperative the examination of or response to submissions alleging a disproportionate interference, within the meaning of Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, with his right to respect for his property, constituted by the loss of the added value generated by the pre-empted land.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Scrupulously respect the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 15-25.154
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 06 octobre 2016

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide