Aller au contenu principal
Droit Foncier

Having noted, on the one hand, that a

📅 Décision du 08 October 2014⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Having noted, on the one hand, that a property investment company (société civile immobilière) had carried out a property transaction financed by loans taken out personally by a shareholder, a spouse married under community of property, and repaid partly out of community funds and the wife's separate funds, and, on the other hand, that the husband had been allocated a building following the dissolution of the company and had then resold it, the community not yet having been liquidated, it was by the correct application of Article 1469 of the Civil Code that a court of appeal declared the husband liable for a compensation claim (récompense) and a debt calculated according to the rules of subsisting profit (profit subsistant) based on the resale price of the building

Reference decision: cc • No. 13-21.879 • 2014-10-08 • View decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Having noted, on the one hand, that a property investment company (société civile immobilière) had carried out a property transaction financed by loans taken out personally by a shareholder, a spouse married under community of property, and repaid partly out of community funds and the wife's separate funds, and, on the other hand, that the husband had been allocated a building following the dissolution of the company and had then resold it, the community not yet having been liquidated, it was by the correct application of Article 1469 of the Civil Code that a court of appeal declared the husband liable for a compensation claim (récompense) and a debt calculated according to the rules of subsisting profit (profit subsistant) based on the resale price of the building

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Scrupulously comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 13-21.879
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 08 octobre 2014

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Foncier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit foncier

Tous les articles Foncier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide