Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Having noted that a person who had

📅 Décision du 27 November 1996⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Having noted that a person who had acquired a flat accessed by a terrace shared with another flat, on which there was a small structure, had used the latter without anyone raising any objection, and having found that the owner of the second flat had destroyed that construction, a court of appeal, ruling in summary proceedings, was able to infer the existence of a manifestly unlawful disturbance.

Reference decision: cc • No. 94-16.122 • 1996-11-27 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Having noted that a person who had acquired a flat accessed by a terrace shared with another flat, on which there was a small structure, had used the latter without anyone raising any objection, and having found that the owner of the second flat had destroyed that construction, a court of appeal, ruling in summary proceedings, was able to infer the existence of a manifestly unlawful disturbance.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 94-16.122
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 27 novembre 1996

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide