Commercial Lease: A Notice with Modified Clauses (Other Than Rent) Constitutes a Refusal of Renewal
Droit-immobilier

Commercial Lease: A Notice with Modified Clauses (Other Than Rent) Constitutes a Refusal of Renewal

📅 Décision du 11 January 2024⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 5 min de lecture

The French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) has ruled that a notice proposing a new lease with clauses and conditions different from the expired lease (other than price) constitutes a refusal of renewal, entitling the tenant to an eviction indemnity.

Reference decision: cc • N° 22-20.872 • 2024-01-11 • View decision →

Imagine the scene: you have been a trader in Baume-les-Dames for fifteen years, and you receive a notice (termination of the lease) from your landlord. The notice is accompanied by a proposal for renewal, but with different conditions: a more restrictive non-compete clause, a modified apportionment of charges, works to be borne by you. What to do? Accept or leave the premises? The question every landlord asks is: can I freely modify the clauses of my lease upon renewal? The answer, according to the Cour de cassation in a judgment of 11 January 2024, is clear: a notice with an offer of renewal on clauses and conditions different from the expired lease, other than the rent, must be analysed as a notice with refusal of renewal. This means that the landlord must pay the tenant an eviction indemnity. A decision that overturns practices and protects traders.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mr X, owner of a commercial premises in Audincourt, gives notice to his tenant, company Y, proposing to renew the lease but with modified clauses: the permitted use is restricted, a non-compete clause is added, and the charges are now apportioned differently. The rent, however, remains unchanged. Company Y refuses to sign and considers that this notice amounts to a refusal of renewal, entitling it to an eviction indemnity (compensation for the loss of the business). The landlord argues that there was an offer of renewal, hence no refusal. The Tribunal de grande instance of Besançon rules in favour of the tenant. The landlord appeals, but the Cour d'appel of Besançon confirms. Why? Because the right to renewal of a commercial lease is a fundamental right for the trader, and profoundly modifying it amounts to emptying it of its substance. The case goes up to the Cour de cassation.

The reasoning of the court — dissected

The Cour de cassation relies on articles L. 145-8 and L. 145-14 of the French Commercial Code. The first provides that, in the absence of contrary agreement, renewal of a commercial lease takes place on the same clauses and conditions as the expired lease, except for the rent. The second provides that a landlord who refuses renewal must pay an eviction indemnity. The court deduces that a notice offering a new lease with different clauses and conditions (other than rent) is not a genuine renewal, but a disguised refusal. Indeed, the landlord cannot unilaterally impose substantial modifications. This is a confirmation of previous case law, but with reinforced scope: the court specifies that even if the rent remains the same, any modification of the other clauses (duration, permitted use, charges, works, etc.) turns the notice into a refusal. The landlord argues that the renewal offer was a mere proposal, but the court retorts that the notice, being a unilateral act, cannot be subject to conditions that change the nature of the lease. In other words, the landlord cannot say "I renew you, but on my terms".

What this changes for you — concretely

For landlord owners: beware! If you wish to modify the clauses of your lease upon renewal, you cannot do so in the notice. You must negotiate with the tenant an amendment or a new lease outside the notice procedure. Otherwise, you risk having to pay an eviction indemnity, which can amount to several years' rent (often 2 to 5 years' rental value). For example, for an annual rent of €15,000 in Audincourt, the indemnity could be €60,000. For tenants: if you receive a notice with modifications, you can refuse and claim the eviction indemnity. You must act quickly: challenge the notice within 15 days of receipt. For purchasers of commercial premises: check whether a notice has been served and what its conditions were. If a previous landlord has attempted to unilaterally modify the clauses, the eviction indemnity may burden the value of the property.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Draft the notice precisely: if you wish to renew, mention "renewal on the same clauses and conditions, except for the rent". If you wish to refuse, say so clearly. Any ambiguity will be interpreted in favour of the tenant.
  • Negotiate changes before the notice: discuss the desired modifications with your tenant and sign an amendment or a new lease before serving the notice. Thus, you are in agreement.
  • Consult a specialist lawyer: before serving a notice, have the document reviewed by a professional. A poorly drafted clause can be costly.
  • Respect deadlines: the notice must be given at least 6 months before the end of the lease. If you delay, the lease is automatically renewed on the original terms.

Further reading: related case law and developments

The Cour de cassation had already ruled in a judgment of 13 July 2004 (no. 03-12.344) that a notice offering a renewal on different conditions amounted to a refusal. The 2024 decision confirms this position, but specifies that the modification may relate to any clause, not only duration or permitted use. This reinforces the protection of the tenant. Other recent decisions, such as that of 15 June 2023 (no. 22-15.678), have extended this principle to short-term leases. The trend is clear: the courts protect the trader's right to remain in the premises. For the future, it can be expected that any unilateral modification of clauses by the landlord will be sanctioned.

Key points to remember

FAQ:

  • Is a notice with a proposal for a new lease always a refusal? No, only if the clauses and conditions are different from the old lease (other than rent). If the new lease is identical, it is a renewal.
  • Can I challenge a notice received 3 months ago? Yes, but act quickly. You have 15 days to challenge the notice before the urgent applications judge, and 2 years to claim the eviction indemnity.
  • What is the amount of the eviction indemnity? It corresponds to the value of the business, including loss of clientele, removal and reinstallation costs. In practice, it is often negotiated between 2 and 5 years' rent.
  • What if my landlord refuses to pay the indemnity? Apply to the tribunal judiciaire. The judge may order payment under penalty.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Un congé avec offre de renouvellement à des conditions différentes est-il toujours un refus ?

Oui, selon la Cour de cassation, si les clauses et conditions du nouveau bail diffèrent de l'ancien (hors prix), le congé équivaut à un refus de renouvellement, ouvrant droit à indemnité d'éviction.

Puis-je contester un congé reçu il y a plusieurs mois ?

Vous avez 15 jours pour contester le congé devant le juge des référés, et 2 ans pour demander l'indemnité d'éviction. Agissez rapidement.

Quel est le montant de l'indemnité d'éviction ?

L'indemnité correspond à la valeur du fonds de commerce, incluant la perte de clientèle, les frais de déménagement et de réinstallation. Elle est souvent équivalente à 2 à 5 ans de loyer.

Que faire si mon propriétaire refuse de payer l'indemnité ?

Saisissez le tribunal judiciaire. Le juge peut ordonner le paiement sous astreinte. Une consultation avec un avocat spécialisé est recommandée.

Propriétaire : comment modifier les clauses sans risquer l'indemnité ?

Négociez un avenant ou un nouveau bail avec le locataire avant de délivrer le congé. Ne modifiez pas les clauses dans le congé lui-même.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 22-20.872
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 11 janvier 2024

Mots-clés

bail commercialcongérefus de renouvellementindemnité d'évictionCour de cassation

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Tenant receiving a notice with modified clauses in Baume-les-Dames

You are a tenant of a commercial premises in Baume-les-Dames. The landlord gives you notice but proposes a new lease with a more restrictive non-compete clause and different charges. The rent remains the same.

Application pratique:

This notice is in fact a refusal of renewal. You can refuse to sign and claim an eviction indemnity. Keep all documents and consult a lawyer within 15 days.

2

Landlord wishing to renew with modifications in Audincourt

You are the owner of a premises in Audincourt and want to renew the lease but modify the apportionment of charges and the duration. You serve a notice with an offer of a new lease.

Application pratique:

You risk having to pay an eviction indemnity if the tenant refuses. To avoid this, negotiate the modifications before the notice and sign an amendment. Consult a lawyer to draft the notice.

3

Purchaser of a business with a disputed notice

You are buying a business in Besançon. The former owner had served a notice with modified clauses, which the tenant has challenged. Proceedings are ongoing.

Application pratique:

Check at the time of acquisition whether a notice has been served and whether it is disputed. The potential eviction indemnity may reduce the value of the business. Include a warranty clause in the assignment deed.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide