Eviction Compensation: Calculation as at the Date Closest to Eviction (Cass., 1971)

Imagine: you are the owner of commercial premises in Audierne, leased to a hairdresser for twenty years. You give notice (termination of the lease) to recover the premises, offering eviction compensation (sum due to the evicted tenant to compensate for the loss of his business). But the tenant claims a much higher amount, including a perfumery activity he started four years after your notice. Are you obliged to pay this added value? The answer, given by the Court of Cassation in 1971, is clear: no. A question every landlord asks: how to value the leasehold interest at the time of eviction? The Court answers: at the date closest to the eviction, without taking into account changes after the notice.

This decision, handed down by the commercial chamber of the Court of Cassation on 14 December 1971 (appeal no. 70-13.170), is an essential reference. It reminds us that eviction compensation is calculated at the date closest to the actual eviction, and that judges must not take into account an activity not provided for in the lease, undertaken several years after service of the notice (official notification of termination).

The Facts: A Story Like Any Other

Mr Boubal, owner of a hairdressing salon located in rue Saint-Benoît in Paris, gives notice to his commercial tenant with an offer of eviction compensation. The tenant, who operated a hairdressing salon, had added, four years after service of the notice, a perfumery activity. This activity was not provided for in the original lease. The dispute concerns the amount of compensation: the tenant wants to include the value of this new activity, the landlord refuses.

The case goes to the Court of Appeal, which rules in favour of the tenant by including the perfumery in the valuation. Mr Boubal appeals to the Court of Cassation. He argues that the compensation must be calculated at a date close to the eviction, and that the perfumery activity, subsequent to the notice and not authorised by the lease, should not be taken into account. The Court of Cassation agrees: it quashes the appeal judgment, finding that the lower courts violated the rules by including an activity that was neither provided for nor legitimate under the lease.

This case perfectly illustrates the tensions between commercial landlords and tenants. The landlord often wishes to recover his premises or relet them at a higher rent, while the tenant wants to maximise the compensation. The Court sets a simple rule: value as at the date of eviction, and do not take into account unilateral changes after the notice.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation relies on Article 1134 of the Civil Code (now 1103) which provides that agreements lawfully entered into have the force of law for those who have made them. In plain terms, the lease is the law of the parties: if the tenant does not have the right to carry on the perfumery under the lease, this activity cannot be valued in the eviction compensation. The decision states that 'eviction compensation must be calculated at the date closest to the eviction'. This means that the valuation is made at the date nearest to the actual eviction, and not at an earlier or later date that would distort the rights of the parties.

Furthermore, the Court disregards the perfumery activity because it was 'not provided for in the lease' and was 'undertaken several years after service of the notice'. The judges consider that the tenant cannot, after receiving notice, unilaterally change the operation to inflate the compensation. This is an application of the principle of contractual loyalty and non-aggravation of loss.

This decision confirms consistent case law: eviction compensation is compensation, not enrichment. It must correspond to the value of the leasehold interest on the eve of eviction, without taking into account the tenant's late initiatives. At the time, some lower courts tended to 'freeze' the valuation at the date of the notice, which could be unfavourable to the landlord if the market rose. Here, the Court imposes a moving date: the date closest to the eviction, which may be after the notice if the eviction takes place later. But beware: only elements existing before the notice or resulting from normal operation under the lease are taken into account.

What This Means for You — Practically

For the landlord: You can sleep soundly: if your tenant adds an unauthorised activity after the notice, you will not have to compensate for this artificial added value. Worked example: in Concarneau, a hairdresser with a 10-year lease receives notice. He opens a sandwich shop two years later, without authorisation. The compensation will be calculated only on the value of the hairdressing salon at the date of eviction, not on the sandwich shop.

For the evicted tenant: Do not rely on unforeseen extensions to increase your compensation. If you want to value a new activity, you must have it included in the lease before the notice, or at least carry it on regularly and notify it. Otherwise, the valuation will be based on the authorised activity.

For the purchaser of the business: When you buy a business, check the exact scope of the leasehold interest. If the seller added an activity without right, it could be ignored in the event of eviction, which would reduce the value of the business.

Time limits: the compensation must be fixed by the commercial rent judge. The procedure can last 6 to 18 months. In the meantime, the tenant remains in the premises, but must pay an occupation rent (increased rent).

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Draft a precise lease: clearly mention the authorised activities. Avoid overly broad clauses like 'any trade'. In Audierne, for example, if you lease to a hairdresser, specify 'hairdressing only'.
• Monitor the operation: if your tenant changes activity, send a formal notice (registered letter) within 6 months. Otherwise, you risk losing your right to object.
• Have the leasehold interest valued regularly: every 3 years, by an expert. This allows you to anticipate the compensation in case of notice. In Concarneau, a valuation costs between €800 and €1,500, but avoids surprises.
• Consult a lawyer before giving notice: a professional will check the validity of the notice, the authorised activities and the valuation date. This will avoid paying an overvalued compensation.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This 1971 decision is confirmed by a Court of Cassation judgment of 21 June 1976 (no. 74-14.208), which specifies that compensation must be assessed at the date closest to the eviction, but taking into account the rental value (market rent) at that date. Another judgment of 5 July 1994 (no. 92-18.311) is in the same vein: activity carried on after the notice is not taken into account if not provided for in the lease.

The trend of the courts is therefore consistent: protection of the landlord against unilateral initiatives of the tenant after the notice. This means that if you are a tenant, you must secure any extension of activity by way of a lease amendment before any notice. For the future, case law could evolve towards taking into account activities carried on in good faith and notified, but for now the rule is strict.

Summary and Next Steps

FAQ:

• Is eviction compensation calculated at the date of notice or eviction? At the date closest to the actual eviction, according to the Court of Cassation.
• Can I add an activity after the notice to increase the compensation? No, if it is not provided for in the lease.
• What if my tenant changes activity without authorisation? Send a formal notice and, if necessary, apply to the summary proceedings judge (emergency procedure).
• What is the deadline to challenge eviction compensation? You have two months from notification of the notice to apply to the commercial rent judge.
• Can I be evicted without compensation? Yes, if there is a serious cause (e.g., non-payment of rent) or if the landlord justifies a legitimate reason (e.g., repossession for dwelling).

Are you in a similar situation? An initial 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →