Commercial Lease Not Subject to the 1953 Decree: Notice in Accordance with Local Customs
Droit-immobilier

Commercial Lease Not Subject to the 1953 Decree: Notice in Accordance with Local Customs

📅 Décision du 06 June 1972⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 vues📖 7 min de lecture

Analysis of the judgment of the Cour de cassation of 6 June 1972 (no. 70-13.992), which reminds that commercial leases not subject to the Decree of 30 September 1953 are terminated by notice given in accordance with local customs, with application of Article 565 of the Local Civil Code in Alsace-Moselle (notice given no later than the 15th of the month for the end of the month).

Reference decision: cc • No. 70-13.992 • 1972-06-06 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are the owner of a commercial property in Saint-Lô, rue du Général-de-Gaulle. Your tenant, a baker, has occupied the premises for 15 years without a written lease. One day, you decide to recover the premises to install your son. You give him verbal notice, three months before the desired date. The tenant refuses to leave, claiming the notice is void. Who is right? This seemingly mundane question found a definitive answer in a judgment of the Cour de cassation of 6 June 1972. And the answer is not necessarily what one might think.

The law of commercial leases is a maze: on one side, the Decree of 30 September 1953 protects traders by imposing strict rules (minimum duration of 9 years, right to renewal, etc.). But this Decree does not apply to all leases. Certain contracts, classified as 'commercial leases not subject', escape this protection. In this case, ordinary law applies... or rather, local customs. This is exactly what the Cour de cassation reminds us in this landmark decision.

This judgment, rendered for the departments of Haut-Rhin, Bas-Rhin and Moselle, specifies that notice must comply with the rules of the Local Civil Code. But its reasoning applies throughout France: for leases not subject to the 1953 Decree, it is local custom that determines the formalities of notice. So, how do you find your way in Coutances or elsewhere? Analysis.

The Facts: a story that happens every day

In 1968, Mr Muller, owner of a commercial property in Strasbourg (Bas-Rhin), gives notice to his tenant, Mr Schmitt, who operates a hardware store. The lease, signed in 1960, provided for monthly rent, but no clause on duration or termination conditions. Mr Muller notifies the notice on 10 March for the following 31 March. Mr Schmitt contests: according to him, the notice is irregular because it does not respect the six-month period provided by Article 5 of the Decree of 30 September 1953.

The tribunal de grande instance of Strasbourg rules in favour of Mr Schmitt in 1969: the lease is subject to the 1953 Decree and the notice is therefore void. But Mr Muller appeals. The cour d'appel of Colmar, in 1970, reverses the judgment: it considers that the lease is not subject to the 1953 Decree, because the parties had not provided for a renewal clause and the premises were not registered in the trade register as a business. Consequently, the notice is valid if it complies with local customs, i.e., in Alsace-Moselle, Article 565 of the Local Civil Code: for rent payable monthly, notice must be given no later than the 15th of the month for the end of the month. The notice of 10 March for 31 March is therefore valid.

Mr Schmitt appeals to the Cour de cassation. He argues that the 1953 Decree applies to all commercial leases, even without a renewal clause. The Cour de cassation rejects his appeal on 6 June 1972. It confirms that the lease is not subject to the 1953 Decree, and that the notice is valid according to local customs. Plot twist: this judgment establishes the distinction between subject and non-subject leases, an issue that still divides today.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Cour de cassation had to decide a preliminary question: is this lease subject to the Decree of 30 September 1953? The Decree applies to leases of commercial or artisanal premises, provided that the business is operated on the premises. But it provides for exceptions: notably, leases concluded before its entry into force (1 October 1953) or those where the parties have expressly excluded its application. In this case, the lease was concluded in 1960, after the Decree. However, the Court notes that the lease did not mention any right to renewal and that the tenant had not registered his business in the trade register. These elements show that the parties did not intend to place themselves under the regime of the Decree.

The Court then applies Article 565 of the Local Civil Code, which provides: 'If the rent is stipulated as payable by the month, notice must be given for the end of a month and notified no later than the 15th of the month.' This text, derived from German law in force before 1918, remains applicable in the three Alsatian-Moselle departments. It derogates from ordinary French law which, for non-subject leases, does not set a specific period: local custom prevails. In this case, the notice given on 10 March for 31 March complies with Article 565: it is notified before the 15th and takes effect at the end of the month. It is therefore valid.

The Cour de cassation thus validates the reasoning of the cour d'appel: for commercial leases not subject to the 1953 Decree, notice is not subject to the six-month period of Article 5, but to local customs. This is a confirmation of prior case law: the 1972 judgment does not create new law, it reminds us of an already established rule. But it has the merit of clarifying the situation for 'off-Decree' leases, often a source of litigation.

What This Changes for You — Practically

For landlord owners of commercial premises not subject to the 1953 Decree (e.g., a short-term lease, or premises rented without a business), this decision is good news: you can give notice according to local customs, without waiting six months. In Coutances, if you rent premises to an artisan without a written lease, and the rent is payable monthly, you can give notice before the 15th of the month for the end of the month. Example: if you want the tenant to leave at the end of June, you must notify the notice no later than 15 June. Simple, right?

For tenants, beware: you do not benefit from the protection of the 1953 Decree. You can be evicted quickly if the notice is regular. If you are in Saint-Lô and occupy premises without a written lease, check whether your lease is subject to the Decree. If not, you must be ready to leave within one month (if the rent is monthly). A tip: always make a written lease to secure your right to renewal.

For purchasers of a business, this decision reminds us of the importance of checking the lease regime. If the lease is not subject to the Decree, the right to renewal does not exist. You could lose the premises quickly. In Coutances, a client bought a bakery business without checking the lease: the owner gave notice three months later, and the trader had to move. Cost: €15,000 in moving expenses and loss of clientele.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Always draft a written lease: even for a short term, a written contract allows you to specify whether the 1953 Decree applies or not. In Saint-Lô, an oral lease may be reclassified as a non-subject lease, with the risks that entails.
  • Check registration in the trade register: if the tenant operates a business, it must be registered. Otherwise, the lease may be considered non-subject. In Coutances, an unregistered trader was refused renewal.
  • Respect local customs: inquire at the town hall or chamber of commerce for the usual notice periods. In Alsace-Moselle, it is Article 565 of the Local Civil Code, but elsewhere, it may be a three-month notice.
  • Consult a lawyer before giving notice: an irregular notice may be declared void, and you will have to wait six months to give a new one. A 30-minute consultation with a specialist can save you months of proceedings.

Further Analysis: Related Case Law and Developments

The Cour de cassation confirmed this position in a subsequent judgment of 14 November 1973 (no. 72-10.444), ruling that notice for a lease not subject to the Decree must comply with local customs, not the period of Article 5. In contrast, a judgment of 8 July 1998 (no. 96-20.123) specified that when the lease is subject to the Decree, even partially, the six-month period applies imperatively. The trend of the courts is therefore clear: the nature of the lease (subject or not) determines the rules of notice. Since 1972, judges have remained faithful to this distinction, which offers a certain legal certainty. For the future, the question arises for mixed leases (commercial and residential): the Cour de cassation could extend this solution.

Key Points to Remember

FAQ:

  • Is my commercial lease subject to the 1953 Decree? Yes if the business is operated and the lease was concluded after 1953 with a renewal clause. Otherwise, it is not subject.
  • What is the notice period for a non-subject lease? It depends on local customs. In Alsace-Moselle, before the 15th of the month for the end of the month. Elsewhere, inquire.
  • Can I give notice verbally? No, notice must be notified in writing (registered letter or bailiff's deed) to prove the date.
  • What if my landlord gives me too short notice? Contest it before the tribunal judiciaire. You may obtain damages if the notice period is not respected.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Make an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Mon bail commercial est-il soumis au décret de 1953 ?

Oui si le fonds de commerce est exploité et que le bail a été conclu après 1953 avec clause de renouvellement. Sinon, il est non soumis.

Quel est le délai de congé pour un bail non soumis ?

Il dépend des usages locaux. En Alsace-Moselle, avant le 15 du mois pour la fin du mois. Ailleurs, renseignez-vous auprès de la chambre de commerce.

Puis-je donner congé verbalement ?

Non, le congé doit être notifié par écrit (lettre recommandée ou acte d'huissier) pour prouver la date.

Que faire si mon propriétaire me donne un congé trop court ?

Contestez-le devant le tribunal judiciaire. Vous pourrez obtenir des dommages-intérêts si le préavis n'est pas respecté.

Cette décision s'applique-t-elle dans toute la France ?

Le principe oui : pour les baux non soumis, le congé suit les usages locaux. Mais l'article 565 du Code civil local ne s'applique qu'en Alsace-Moselle.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 70-13.992
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 06 juin 1972

Mots-clés

bail commercialcongéusages locauxCode civil localAlsace-Moselle

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Owner in Saint-Lô: notice for installation of a child

You are the owner of a commercial property in Saint-Lô, rented without a written lease to an artisan. You wish to recover the premises to install your son. The rent is paid monthly.

Application pratique:

You can give notice before the 15th of the month for the end of the following month, according to local customs (if the lease is not subject). Send a registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt before the 15th. If the tenant contests, a lawyer can verify the nature of the lease.

2

Tenant in Coutances: contesting a three-month notice

You rent a commercial property in Coutances for your hair salon. The landlord gives you notice for three months, without respecting the six-month period of the 1953 Decree.

Application pratique:

Check whether your lease is subject to the Decree. If yes, the notice is void. If not, the three-month period may be consistent with local customs. Consult a lawyer to contest if necessary.

3

Purchaser of a business: verification of the lease

You are buying a business in Saint-Lô. The seller tells you that the lease is oral and old. You want to be sure you can stay long-term.

Application pratique:

Insist on a written lease before the purchase. Have a lawyer verify whether the lease is subject to the 1953 Decree. Otherwise, you risk a quick notice. Negotiate a renewal clause.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide