Commercial Lease in Divided Ownership: The Repentance of the Naked Owner and the Usufructuary

Imagine for a moment: you are the owner of a commercial premises in Montdidier, in the Somme, which you have let to a trader. But you are not the sole owner of the property: you only hold the naked ownership, while a usufructuary has the use of it. The lease comes to an end, you refuse renewal, then you change your mind. Too late? The tenant has already found another premises in Albert. Who is right? The question is more complex than it seems.

This situation, more common than one might think in commercial leases, raises an essential question: can the right of repentance (the possibility for the landlord to withdraw its refusal to renew the lease) be exercised by the naked owner and the usufructuary together, and does it prevent the tenant from relying on its acquisition or rental of a replacement premises? The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 31 May 2012, ruled: yes, repentance is possible, but subject to a strict condition.

What exactly does this decision say? That the act of acquisition or rental of the new premises by the tenant only defeats the repentance if it has a fixed date before the notification of repentance. In other words, if the tenant has signed a preliminary contract or a lease for its new premises before the landlord notifies its change of mind, the repentance is ineffective. But if the fixed date is later, the landlord can still save the lease.

The facts: an everyday story

The case involves a civil company, naked owner of a commercial premises, and a commercial company, usufructuary of the same property, against their tenant, a limited liability company operating a business. The commercial lease, concluded for a term of 9 years, expires. The landlords notify the tenant of a refusal of renewal. The tenant, not wanting to lose its business, actively seeks another premises to relocate. It finds a premises in Albert and signs a preliminary contract for the acquisition of the shares of a company owning that premises. However, shortly after, the landlords exercise their right of repentance: they inform the tenant that they withdraw their refusal and ultimately agree to renew the lease.

The tenant challenges this: it argues that the repentance is late because it has already acquired a replacement premises. The landlords retort that the acquisition deed did not have a fixed date at the time of repentance. Legal proceedings ensue: first before the Tribunal de Grande Instance, then the Amiens Court of Appeal, and finally the Court of Cassation.

The dispute concerns a technical but crucial issue: the fixed date. In law, a private deed only acquires a fixed date from its registration, the death of a signatory, or its acknowledgment by a public officer. The tenant had signed a deed of transfer of shares, but without immediately registering it. The Court of Appeal had ruled in favour of the tenant, holding that the acquisition was genuine. The Court of Cassation sets aside that judgment: it recalls that only a deed with a fixed date prior to the repentance can defeat it.

The reasoning of the court — dissected

The Court of Cassation relies on Article L. 145-58 of the Commercial Code (which governs the right of repentance in commercial leases) and on the general principles of evidence. The text is clear: the landlord may exercise its right of repentance as long as the tenant has not acquired or rented a premises intended for its relocation. But the Court specifies that this acquisition or rental must be established by a deed having a fixed date. Why this requirement? To avoid fraud: a tenant could claim to have signed a deed before the repentance, when it was actually done afterwards.

The decision confirms previous case law: repentance is a potestative right (a unilateral faculty) that expires as soon as the tenant has made a firm and certain commitment to rehouse itself. But this commitment must be proven by an authentic or registered deed. In this case, the transfer of shares had not been registered before the notification of repentance. The lower court judges had nevertheless upheld the tenant's repentance, but the Court of Cassation disagrees: they did not examine whether the deed had a fixed date.

The reasoning is therefore a reminder of procedural orthodoxy. It is a confirmation of the rule, not a reversal. The Court also specifies that repentance may be exercised jointly by the naked owner and the usufructuary, since they are both landlords. This avoids a deadlock where one of them alone could block the situation.

The tenant's arguments (genuineness of the acquisition, absence of excessive formalism) are dismissed in favour of legal certainty. The Court considers that the fixed date is a guarantee for both parties.

What this means for you — practically

For landlord owners (naked owners or usufructuaries), this decision is reassuring: you can exercise your repentance even after the tenant has signed a deed, as long as that deed does not have a fixed date. Concretely, if you refuse renewal and then change your mind, you must notify your repentance by extrajudicial act (bailiff). If the tenant opposes a preliminary contract of sale or a lease, check the registration date. Example: in Montdidier, a landlord refused renewal in January, then changed its mind in March. The tenant had signed a lease for a premises in Albert in February, but only registered it in April. The March repentance is valid because the deed did not have a fixed date before.

For tenants, the lesson is the opposite: if you find a new premises, get the deed registered immediately (or go before a notary). Otherwise, the landlord can block you. If you are a tenant in Albert, and your landlord exercises its repentance after you have signed a preliminary contract, but before registration, you risk losing your new premises and having to stay in the old one. Timing is crucial: repentance can be notified until the date of the registered deed.

For property professionals (agents, notaries, lawyers), this decision demands increased vigilance regarding dates. When relocating, the tenant should be advised to register the deed without delay, and the landlord should verify the fixed date before exercising repentance.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Register your deeds without delay: If you are a tenant and you sign a preliminary contract of acquisition or a lease for a new premises, have it registered with the tax authorities (or go before a notary) on the same day. Late registration can ruin your rights.
• Notify repentance by bailiff's act: For landlords, repentance must be served by extrajudicial act. Do not rely on a simple registered letter. The bailiff provides proof of the notification date.
• Check the fixed date before acting: Before exercising your repentance, ask the tenant to provide evidence of any acquisition or rental deed. Demand a copy of the registered deed or the authentic title. If the deed is not dated with certainty, you can repent.
• Anticipate divided ownership: If you are a naked owner or a usufructuary, provide in the division agreement for the modalities of exercising the right of repentance. It is better to act together to avoid any conflict.

Further reading: related case law and developments

This decision follows a consistent line of the Court of Cassation. In a judgment of 24 March 2005 (No. 03-17.612), the Court had already held that repentance is valid as long as the tenant has not acquired or rented a premises with a fixed date. The 2012 judgment merely confirms this rule, but applies it to the case of divided ownership, which was a first.

Another decision, of 6 February 2008 (No. 06-20.731), specified that repentance can be exercised even if the tenant has already signed a preliminary contract, as long as the sale has not been completed. The Court of Cassation therefore distinguishes between effective acquisition (with transfer of ownership) and a mere promise. In our judgment, the transfer of shares was an acquisition, but without a fixed date.

The trend is clear: the courts favour legal certainty and formal proof. In the future, it can be expected that the Court will maintain this requirement of a fixed date, even for leases or acquisitions of shares. For practitioners, it is essential to advise systematic registration of any preparatory deed for relocation.

Frequently asked questions

What is the right of repentance in a commercial lease?
It is the faculty for the landlord who has refused renewal of the lease to withdraw its decision and offer a new lease. This right is provided for in Article L. 145-58 of the Commercial Code.

How can I prove that I acquired a replacement premises before the repentance?
You need a deed with a fixed date: an authentic deed (notarial) or a private deed registered with the tax authorities. A mere preliminary contract that is not registered is not sufficient.

What should I do if the landlord exercises its repentance after I have signed a preliminary contract but before registration?
The repentance is valid. To avoid this, register your deed immediately after signing. You can also ask the notary to give the deed a fixed date.

Can repentance be exercised by only one of the two divided owners?
No, the Court of Cassation requires a joint repentance by the naked owner and the usufructuary, because they are both landlords. If one refuses, repentance is impossible.

What are the deadlines for exercising repentance?
Repentance must be notified before the tenant has acquired or rented a premises with a fixed date. There is no fixed legal deadline, but it is advisable to act quickly after the refusal of renewal.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →