Reference decision: cc • N° 12-22.388 • 2014-04-09 • View decision →
Picture the scene: in Biscarrosse, in the Landes, a farming couple, the Durands, have been leasing a 15-hectare plot from Mr Legrand, a retired owner, since 1999. In 2014, the lease expires. The Durands expect to be able to extend it automatically, as provided for by the statutory tenant farming regime for standard leases. But surprise: their lease is a long-term lease of 18 years, signed in 1999. The owner refuses the extension and intends to recover his land to sell it to a developer. The Durands take the case to court. Who is right?
You may be asking yourself this question if you are an owner or farmer in the Landes or elsewhere. The law on agricultural leases is complex, and a small nuance can change everything. In short: do long-term leases benefit from the same protection as standard leases? The Court of Cassation's answer is clear: no, and the parties cannot derogate from this by contract.
But what exactly does this change? That is what we will look at together, by dissecting this decision of 9 April 2014, handed down by the Court of Cassation, and illustrating it with concrete examples from your region.
The facts: a story like any other
Mr Legrand, owner in Biscarrosse (Landes), granted in 1999 a long-term agricultural lease to Mr and Mrs Durand, farmers. The lease, for a term of 18 years, was to expire in 2017. But in 2014, a disagreement arose: the Durands wished to extend the lease for a further 9 years, on the basis of Article L. 411-58 of the Rural and Maritime Fishing Code (CRPM), which allows the tenant to request the extension of their standard lease. Mr Legrand opposed this, considering that this provision does not apply to long-term leases.
The agricultural leases tribunal of Mont-de-Marsan ruled in favour of the Durands at first instance: it ordered the extension of the lease. Mr Legrand appealed. The Court of Appeal of Pau upheld the judgment, considering that the parties could contractually derogate from Article L. 416-8 of the CRPM, which excludes the application of paragraphs 2 to 4 of Article L. 411-58 for long-term leases. In other words, the Court of Appeal considered that if the contract so provides, extension is possible.
Mr Legrand appealed to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation quashed the appeal judgment. It held that the provisions of Article L. 416-8 are of public policy: the parties cannot derogate from them, even by mutual agreement. Consequently, the extension provided for in Article L. 411-58 (paragraphs 2 to 4) does not apply to long-term leases, and no contractual clause can reinstate it. The case was referred back to the Court of Appeal of Bordeaux.
The court's reasoning — dissected
To understand this decision, one must first know the relevant provisions. Article L. 416-8 of the CRPM provides that long-term leases (of a minimum term of 18 years) are subject to specific rules. In particular, it expressly excludes the application of paragraphs 2 to 4 of Article L. 411-58, which allow the tenant to request an extension of their lease for a maximum term of 9 years, renewable. Why this exclusion? Because long-term leases already provide sufficient stability for the farmer; an additional extension would upset the balance of the owner's rights.
The question was whether the parties could, by a clause in the contract, reintroduce this extension. The Court of Cassation answered no: Article L. 416-8 is of public policy. In law, a rule of public policy is a rule from which one cannot derogate by contract, because it protects the general interest. In other words, even if both parties agree, they cannot circumvent the law. However, note: this does not mean that the long-term lease is totally rigid; other protections remain (such as the right to renewal for the tenant at the expiry of the lease, subject to conditions).
What few people know is that this decision confirms a consistent line of case law: long-term leases are an exceptional regime, designed for long-term security, but without the safety net of extension. undefined, I have come across cases where farmers, confident in the possibility of extension, found themselves without a solution at the end of the lease. That is why it is crucial to read your contract carefully.
What this changes for you — practically
For owner landlords: you can recover your land at the end of a long-term lease, without fear of an imposed extension. Example with figures: in Tarnos, an owner leases 5 hectares to a market gardener for 25 years. At the end, he wishes to sell the land to a developer. The tenant cannot demand an extension, even if the contract provided for it. You are therefore freer to dispose of your property.
For tenant farmers: you do not benefit from the automatic extension. You must anticipate the end of the lease and negotiate a new contract or prepare to leave. If you are in this situation, you must check the term of your lease and, if necessary, request a renewal (possible under certain conditions, but not an extension). Note: renewal is a new lease, with conditions to be renegotiated.
For purchasers: if you buy land subject to a long-term lease, know that the tenant has no right to extension. You can therefore hope for vacant possession at the end, but you must respect the existing lease.
Four tips to avoid this type of dispute
- Check the nature of your lease: before signing, ensure it is a long-term lease (minimum 18 years) or a standard lease (9 years). The rules differ.
- Do not rely on an extension clause: even if your contract mentions a possibility of extension for a long-term lease, that clause is void. Get assistance from a lawyer to draft valid clauses, such as a promise of a new lease.
- Anticipate the expiry: from the 5th year before the end of the lease, start discussions with the other party to negotiate a renewal or prepare your exit. A notice period of 18 months is often required.
- Consult a lawyer lawyer: in Mont-de-Marsan or elsewhere, a professional can analyse your contract and advise you on your actual rights. Do not let a dispute catch you off guard.
Further reading: related case law and developments
This decision is part of a consistent line of authority. As early as 2006, the Court of Cassation (Civ. 3e, 18 January 2006, n° 04-17.156) had ruled that long-term leases could not benefit from the extension provided for in Article L. 411-58. The 2014 decision confirms this principle and clarifies the public policy nature of the exclusion.
However, there is one notable exception: if the long-term lease was concluded before the entry into force of Article L. 416-8 (created by the law of 9 July 1999), transitional rules may apply. But since 1999, the regime is clear.
What this means for the future: the courts will continue to apply this exclusion strictly. Farmers must therefore incorporate this constraint into their business strategy. A recent trend is the proliferation of long-term leases with automatic renewal clauses (different from extension), which are valid if they comply with public policy.
In practice: what to do
FAQ:
- Can I extend my long-term lease if the contract so provides? No, the clause is void because it is contrary to public policy.
- What to do at the end of my long-term lease? Negotiate a new lease (renewal) or leave the premises. A notice period of 18 months is recommended.
- Can the owner refuse renewal? Yes, unless the tenant has a right to renewal (strict conditions: personal farming, etc.).
- Is there a time limit to challenge an extension clause? Yes, the limitation period is 5 years from the signing of the lease. Have your contract checked quickly.
Checklist:
- ☐ Identify the term of your lease (18 years or more?).
- ☐ Read Article L. 416-8 of the CRPM.
- ☐ Check if an extension clause exists in your contract.
- ☐ Consult a lawyer to know your options before the end.
Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.
Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →
📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, lawyer in French real estate law, practises throughout France.
→ Avocat bail commercial & droit immobilier |
→ Browse all our legal articles

