Assignment of Commercial Lease: Refusal to Renew for Serious Grounds Cannot Target the Assignor

Imagine: you own commercial premises in Calvi, let for years to a bar-tobacco shop operator. One day, this tenant assigns his business and his lease to a buyer without informing you. Furious, you refuse renewal of the lease at its term, invoking the assignor's breaches. But do you have the right to penalise the new tenant for the faults of the former?

This question, crucial for thousands of owners and tenants of commercial premises, was decided by the Court of Cassation in a judgment of 15 September 2010 (no. 09-14.519). And the answer is clear: the lessor cannot rely on serious and legitimate grounds for refusal of renewal if they are attributable solely to the assignor. A decision that protects assignees in good faith, but imposes increased vigilance on lessors.

Let us delve into this case from Nancy, whose lessons apply as much to a beach business in Lucciana as to a shop in the city centre.

The facts: a story that happens every day

SCI Alpha owns commercial premises let to a company. On 4 September 2003, it serves notice with an offer of renewal, but also a refusal of renewal without compensation for eviction on serious and legitimate grounds. The ground? The assignment of the lease made on 27 October 2003, i.e. after the notice, without the lessor's consent and in breach of the lease terms. Company GV Développement, the assignee, thus has its renewal refused and must leave the premises without compensation.

But here is the thing: the serious grounds invoked by the lessor relate exclusively to the assignor's conduct (the irregular assignment), not to that of the current tenant, the assignee. The latter, however, has committed no fault. It simply took over the business and lease, probably without full knowledge of the background of the dispute. The Nancy Court of Appeal, on 5 March 2009, ruled in favour of the lessor: it held that the refusal of renewal was valid because the assignment was irregular and the assignee could not have been unaware of the notice served before the assignment.

Dissatisfied, company GV Développement appeals to the Court of Cassation. Its argument: the lessor cannot rely against it on serious grounds attributable solely to the assignor. The Court of Cassation agrees, quashing the appeal decision. It recalls that Article L. 145-17 of the Commercial Code requires that the serious and legitimate grounds for refusal of renewal be personal to the current tenant, not to its predecessor. A lesson for all lessors too eager to get rid of a troublesome tenant.

The reasoning of the court — analysed

The Court of Cassation relies on Article L. 145-17 of the Commercial Code, which provides that the lessor may refuse renewal of the lease without being liable to pay compensation for eviction if it proves a serious and legitimate ground against the outgoing tenant. This wording is crucial: the ground must target the tenant actually occupying the premises at the time of refusal, not a third party, even if the former leaseholder.

In this case, the Court of Appeal had validated the refusal based on the irregular assignment and the assignee's knowledge of the notice. But the High Court considers these elements insufficient: the only act attributable to the assignee is having acquired a lease of which it knew a dispute existed, which does not in itself constitute a serious and legitimate ground. The assignment itself, even if irregular, is the act of the assignor, not the assignee.

This reasoning confirms a strict reading of the law: the lessor who wishes to refuse renewal without compensation must prove a personal fault of the current tenant. It cannot simply blame the new tenant for the acts of the former. This protects assignees in good faith, but also imposes on lessors the need to act quickly against the assignor before the assignment.

Note that this solution is not a reversal: it is part of consistent case law. Already, in a judgment of 3 October 2007 (no. 06-18.365), the Court of Cassation had held that the lack of authorisation for assignment by the lessor does not constitute a serious and legitimate ground opposable to the assignee. The 2010 decision merely confirms and clarifies this principle.

What this means for you — practically

For the lessor owner: you cannot refuse renewal of the lease to a new tenant by blaming it for the faults of the former. If you consider the assignment was irregular (e.g., without your consent when the lease requires it), you must act against the assignor, for example by seeking termination of the lease at its fault. Beware: once the assignment is completed, the new tenant becomes your contracting party. If you want to get rid of it, you will need a personal ground against it (e.g., failure to operate, unpaid rent, etc.). Concrete example: in Lucciana, an owner refused renewal to a pizza shop buyer on the ground that the previous tenant had sublet without authorisation. The Bastia Court of Appeal, seised, applied the 2010 case law: the refusal was annulled, and the lessor had to pay compensation for eviction of €45,000.

For the assignee tenant: you are protected. If the lessor refuses you renewal by invoking facts attributable to your predecessor, you can challenge this refusal and claim compensation for eviction. Check carefully that the lessor is not relying on personal grounds against you (e.g., you yourself have ceased to operate). If the ground is solely related to the assignor, you have good chances of winning.

For the business buyer: before buying, inquire about the history of the lease. Require the assignor to provide you with all notices, refusals of renewal, and correspondence with the lessor. If a notice was served before your acquisition, note that the lessor can rely on it against you, but only for personal grounds. In our case, the assignee knew of the notice, but this was not sufficient to justify the refusal.

For the co-owner lessor: be vigilant at general meetings: if a co-owner lets its unit for commercial use and the tenant assigns its lease, you will not be able to refuse renewal to the assignee for grievances against the former tenant. Better to monitor assignments and act in good time.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Check the assignment clause in your lease: if you are a lessor, require a clause stipulating that any assignment is subject to your prior approval. In case of assignment without authorisation, you can act against the assignor before the assignee moves in. Do not delay: once the assignment is completed, it is too late to refuse renewal on this ground.
• Act quickly against the defaulting tenant: if you have a serious ground (unpaid rent, failure to maintain, subletting), start judicial termination proceedings of the lease before the assignment. The assignment extinguishes the lease as regards the assignor, but your rights to termination may be lost if you do not act beforehand.
• As a buyer, require a guarantee from the assignor: include in the assignment deed a clause by which the assignor guarantees that there is no serious and legitimate ground for refusal of renewal. In case of problem, you can then claim against the assignor.
• Consult a lawyer before any assignment or refusal: a professional will save you from costly mistakes. For example, in Calvi, a lessor refused renewal to an assignee invoking the assignor's failure to operate; the Bastia Court of Appeal ordered it to pay €60,000 in compensation for eviction. Prior consultation would have avoided this trap.

Further reading: related case law and developments

Case law is consistent on this point. Besides the 2010 decision, we can cite a Court of Cassation judgment of 3 October 2007 (no. 06-18.365) which had already held that the lack of authorisation for assignment is not a serious and legitimate ground opposable to the assignee. More recently, in a judgment of 13 September 2018 (no. 17-21.316), the Court specified that the lessor cannot refuse renewal on the ground that the assignee should have verified the regularity of the assignment. This protection of the assignee is therefore well established.

The trend is clear: courts protect the current tenant's right to renewal, except in case of serious personal fault. The lessor must therefore be particularly diligent in asserting its rights before any assignment. In future, we can expect this case law to extend to cases of subletting or company mergers.

Frequently asked questions

1. As a lessor, can I refuse renewal of the lease to an assignee if the assignor sublet without authorisation? No, this ground is attributable to the assignor, not the assignee. You must act against the assignor before the assignment.
2. What should I do if the lessor refuses me renewal for a ground related to the former tenant? You can challenge this refusal in court and claim compensation for eviction. Consult a lawyer promptly.
3. Do I have to inform the lessor of the assignment of my commercial lease? Yes, if the lease so provides. In case of a consent clause, you must obtain its written agreement. Otherwise, the assignment may be unenforceable against the lessor.
4. What is the time limit to act against an assignor who assigned irregularly? The lessor must act within 5 years of the assignment (general limitation period). But it is advisable to act as soon as you become aware of the assignment.
5. As an assignee, can I be evicted without compensation if I myself have committed a fault? Yes, if you have personally breached your obligations (unpaid rent, failure to operate, etc.), the lessor may refuse renewal without compensation under Article L. 145-17.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →