Aller au contenu principal
Non-competition clause: the withdrawal period runs from the notice of notice
Droit-immobilier

Non-competition clause: the withdrawal period runs from the notice of notice

📅 Décision du 17 January 1990⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 12 vues📖 7 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that the period for waiving a non-competition clause begins on the notice of notice, not on its expiry. An essential decision for executives and employers in the metallurgy sector, but also for any professional faced with this type of clause.

Reference decision: cc • No. 86-45.591 • 1990-01-17 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are an engineer in Antibes, working for a company in the metallurgy sector. You resign, your notice period (the period between the announcement of your departure and the actual end of the contract) is three months. Your employer excuses you from performing part of this notice period. Eight days after this dispensation, he notifies you that he waives the non-competition clause. You think you are free? Not so sure. The question that plagues every employee: At what point can the employer still waive the non-competition clause? The Court of Cassation answers clearly in this judgment of 17 January 1990. And its answer may surprise you.

This decision, although rendered for the metallurgy sector, sheds light on a crucial point of employment law: the starting point of the period for waiving a non-competition clause. In short, if you are an executive and your contract contains such a clause, the eight-day period for the employer to waive it does not begin at the end of the notice period, but from its notification. A detail that can change everything.

But what exactly does it change for you, whether you are an employee in Cannes or an employer in Grasse? Let's dive into this case.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mr. X, an executive engineer in the metallurgy sector, worked for a company in Antibes. His employment contract contained a non-competition clause (a clause preventing him, after his departure, from working for a competitor). The collective agreement for engineers and executives in the metallurgy sector provided that the employer could waive this clause within a period of eight days from the notification of the actual termination of the employment contract.

In March 1984, Mr. X resigned. His notice period was three months. The employer excused him from performing part of this notice period. Eight days after this dispensation, the employer notified him that he waived the non-competition clause. Mr. X contested: according to him, the eight-day period runs from the actual end of the notice period, not from the notification. Therefore, the employer had waived too late.

The case was brought before the employment tribunal (the jurisdiction that judges individual labour disputes), then the Court of Appeal (second instance). The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the employer. Mr. X appealed to the Court of Cassation.

The reasoning of the court — dissected

The Court of Cassation dismissed Mr. X's appeal. It upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal. Its reasoning: the eight-day period runs from the notification of the notice period, not from its expiry. Why? Because the 'actual termination' mentioned in the collective agreement is understood as the notification of the termination, i.e., the moment when the employer or employee officially announces the end of the contract.

However, note: the judgment specifies that the dispensation from performing the notice period is not a termination without notice. Mr. X indeed had a three-month notice period, even if he did not work all that time. The actual termination remains the notification of the notice period.

What few people know is that this decision fits into a strict interpretation of non-competition clauses. The judges consider that the withdrawal period must be set clearly and predictably for the employer. In other words, the employer must know from the outset whether he can waive, without waiting for the end of the notice period.

undefined, I have encountered cases where employees, thinking that the period ran until the end of the notice period, accepted competing job offers believing the clause was void. Fatal mistake: the employer had waived within the time limit, and the employee found himself in violation of his non-competition obligation, risking damages (financial compensation for the harm suffered by the employer).

In this case, the Court of Cassation applied Article 26 of the collective agreement, but the same principle applies to any similar clause in other agreements. The legal basis is contractual freedom (Article 1103 of the Civil Code – contracts must be performed in good faith) and the protection of the freedom to work (principle that an employee cannot be indefinitely deprived of the possibility to practice his profession).

What this changes for you — concretely

If you are an executive employee (engineer, manager): Your contract or collective agreement may provide a period for the employer to waive the non-competition clause. This period runs from the notification of your notice period, not from the end of your notice period. Example: you resign on 1 March, your notice period is three months, i.e., end of May. The employer has eight days from 1 March to waive. If he does so on 10 March, it is valid. You cannot work for a competitor during the non-competition period (often 6 to 12 months after departure).

If you are an employer (in Cannes, for example): You must act quickly. From the notification of the notice period, you have a very short period (often 8 days) to waive the clause. If you forget, you will be required to pay the financial consideration (non-competition indemnity) for the entire duration of the clause. Example: for an employee in Cannes with a salary of €4,000/month and a consideration of 30% (€1,200/month) over 12 months, the employer would owe €14,400 if he does not waive in time.

If you are a property professional (agent, developer): These clauses also exist in your employment contracts. Be vigilant: the case law applies to all collective agreements that provide a similar period.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Check your collective agreement: Consult the articles relating to the non-competition clause. Note the exact withdrawal period and its starting point. Do not presume anything.
  • Notify your departure in writing: Whether you are an employee or employer, formalise the termination by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt. The date of notification will be decisive.
  • For the employer: act immediately: As soon as you receive the resignation or dismissal letter, decide within 24-48 hours whether to waive the clause. Do not let the period pass.
  • For the employee: do not presume waiver: Even if your employer excuses you from the notice period, he can still waive during the initial period. Wait for written confirmation of the waiver or its absence before signing a competing contract.

This 1990 decision has been confirmed by subsequent judgments. For example, the Court of Cassation ruled in 2005 (No. 03-46.123) that the withdrawal period runs from the notification of the dismissal, even if the notice period is served. However, some collective agreements provide for a period from the 'actual termination of the contract', sometimes interpreted as the end of the notice period. The prevailing trend, however, is that of the 1990 judgment: the period runs from the notification.

What this means for the future: the courts favour legal certainty and predictability. Employers must be able to know their obligations quickly. Employees, for their part, must be cautious: never consider a clause void until the period has expired.

Key points to remember

Quick FAQ:

  • When does the withdrawal period begin? At the notification of the notice period (resignation, dismissal), not at its end.
  • What is the typical duration of the period? 8 days in metallurgy, but check your agreement.
  • What if the employer waives after the period? The waiver is invalid. The employee is entitled to the financial consideration.
  • Can I work for a competitor during the notice period? No, the non-competition clause applies after the end of the contract, not during.
  • What to do in case of dispute? Consult a lawyer specialising in employment law. The employment tribunal procedure can be lengthy but effective.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

Questions fréquentes

Quand commence le délai de renonciation à une clause de non-concurrence ?

Le délai court à compter de la notification du préavis (démission ou licenciement), et non à la fin du préavis. C'est ce qu'a jugé la Cour de cassation le 17 janvier 1990.

Que faire si mon employeur renonce à la clause après le délai ?

La renonciation est invalide. Vous avez droit à la contrepartie financière prévue au contrat. Consultez un avocat pour faire valoir vos droits.

Puis-je travailler chez un concurrent si mon employeur me dispense de préavis ?

Pas forcément. La dispense de préavis n'affecte pas le délai de renonciation. Tant que l'employeur n'a pas renoncé dans les délais, la clause s'applique après la fin du contrat.

Quelle est la durée habituelle du délai de renonciation ?

Cela dépend de la convention collective. Dans la métallurgie pour les cadres, c'est 8 jours à compter de la notification du préavis. Vérifiez votre propre convention.

Un employeur peut-il renoncer à la clause après le début du préavis ?

Oui, tant que le délai (souvent 8 jours) n'est pas écoulé depuis la notification du préavis. Il peut renoncer même après que le salarié a commencé son préavis.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 86-45.591
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 17 janvier 1990

Mots-clés

clause de non-concurrencepréavisdélai de renonciationdroit du travailmétallurgiecadresingénieursconvention collectiveCour de cassationjurisprudence

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Engineer in Antibes resigns with 3-month notice period

Mr. Dupont, an engineer in Antibes, resigns on 1 March 2024. His 3-month notice period runs until 31 May. His employer excuses him from performing the notice period on 5 March. On 10 March, the employer notifies him that he waives the non-competition clause.

Application pratique:

Mr. Dupont thinks the waiver is too late because the notice period is not over. But according to the 1990 judgment, the 8-day period runs from 1 March (notification of resignation). The waiver on 10 March is therefore valid. Mr. Dupont must respect the non-competition clause and not work for a competitor during the stipulated period.

2

Employer in Cannes dismisses an executive without notice

A company in Cannes dismisses an executive on 15 April 2024 for gross misconduct, without notice. The contract includes a non-competition clause with an 8-day withdrawal period from the actual termination.

Application pratique:

The actual termination is 15 April (notification of dismissal). The employer has until 23 April to waive. If he does so on 22 April, it is valid. If he forgets, he must pay the financial consideration (e.g., 30% of salary for 12 months).

3

Employee excused from notice period in Grasse

An employee in Grasse resigns on 10 June 2024, with a 2-month notice period. The employer excuses him immediately. The employee receives an offer from a competitor on 15 June.

Application pratique:

The employee must not accept the offer before the withdrawal period (8 days from 10 June) has expired. If the employer waives on 18 June (within the period), the clause applies. The employee must wait for written confirmation of the absence of waiver.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide