Aller au contenu principal
Notice Period and Job Search: The Court of Cassation Clarifies Employees' Rights
Droit-immobilier

Notice Period and Job Search: The Court of Cassation Clarifies Employees' Rights

📅 Décision du 07 May 1987⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 11 vues📖 6 min de lecture

A 1987 ruling by the Court of Cassation clarifies that hours for job search during the notice period do not automatically extend beyond the conventional notice period, unless there is a contrary practice in the company. Analysis for employers and employees.

Reference Decision: Court of Cassation, Social Chamber • No. 85-40.581 • 1987-05-07 • View the decision →

You are an employee in Cannes, dismissed after several years of service, and you wonder if you are entitled to hours to look for a new job during your notice period (the period between the announcement of dismissal and the effective date of departure)? Or you are an employer at a printing company in Vallauris, and you want to know if you must grant these hours beyond the notice period provided for by the collective agreement? This seemingly technical question concerns thousands of employees and employers each year. The Court of Cassation, in a ruling of 7 May 1987, provided a nuanced answer that deserves to be known. Let us discover this decision and its practical implications together.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

In this case, employees of a commercial printing company were dismissed after more than two years of service. The national collective agreement for commercial printing and graphic industries provides for a conventional notice period of one month, but also a right to two hours of absence per day for job search during this notice period. Furthermore, the law of 13 July 1973 (now Article L.1234-1 of the Labour Code) imposes a statutory notice period of two months for employees with more than two years of service. The employees therefore claimed the benefit of the job search hours not only during the one-month conventional notice period, but also during the second month of statutory notice. The employer refused, arguing that the law does not grant this right beyond the conventional notice period. The employees brought the case before the industrial tribunal, which ruled in their favour. The employer appealed to the Court of Cassation.

The Reasoning of the Court — Explained

The Court of Cassation set aside the decision of the lower court. It recalled that the law of 13 July 1973 sets a minimum notice period proportional to length of service, but it does not automatically extend the benefit of the hours for job search to the entire duration of this statutory notice. Indeed, the collective agreement provides for these hours only for the conventional notice period of one month. For employees to benefit from them during the additional statutory notice period, it would be necessary to demonstrate a practice in the company or a more favourable contractual provision. Since the lower court did not investigate the existence of such a practice, its decision was set aside. In short, the magistrates distinguished two sources: the law (minimum notice period) and the collective agreement (job search hours). One does not automatically superimpose on the other. In other words, an employee is entitled to a notice period of two months, but the job search hours are only due during the first month, unless the employer has created a practice of granting these hours for the entire duration.

What This Means for You — Practically

For an employee dismissed in Cannes with 3 years of service, your statutory notice period is 2 months. If your collective agreement (or contract) only provides for job search hours for one month, you are only entitled to 2 hours per day for 30 days, i.e. a maximum of 60 hours. For the second month, you would have to prove that the company has always granted these hours for the entire duration of the notice period (practice). For an employer in Vallauris, you must check your collective agreement and your practices. If no practice exists, you can limit the hours to the conventional notice period. Numerical example: a full-time employee (35 hours/week) with a notice period of 2 months: if they benefit from 2 hours/day for 30 days, this represents 60 hours over the first month, i.e. nearly 2 weeks less work. If you are in this situation, you should consult your collective agreement and your past practices. However, be aware that some collective agreements (such as in the metallurgy sector) provide for hours for the entire duration of the statutory notice period.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Check your collective agreement: Consult the text applicable to your sector (e.g. printing, metallurgy, commerce) to know the duration of the notice period and the rights to job search.
  • Document practices: If your company grants hours beyond the conventional notice period, formalise this practice in writing (internal memo, company agreement) to avoid disputes.
  • In case of dismissal, request a receipt: Have the letter of dismissal or final settlement specify the number of hours granted for job search.
  • Consult a lawyer before acting: Personalised advice can save you from costly mistakes, especially if your situation is atypical (length of service, different conventional notice period).

In an earlier ruling of 20 March 1985 (No. 83-45.672), the Court of Cassation had already held that job search hours are only due during the conventional notice period, unless there is a practice. This case law is consistent: the law does not extend contractual benefits. Since then, the 2016 Labour Law simplified certain rules, but the principle remains. Labour courts continue to apply this distinction. What few people know is that a practice can arise even without a written document: if the employer systematically grants hours for the entire notice period for several years, this becomes a right for employees. undefined, I have encountered cases where the employer had created a practice without knowing it, and had to apply it to everyone. The current trend is protective of employees: in case of doubt, judges check for the existence of a practice.

Checklist Before Acting

  • Question: Is my statutory notice period longer than my conventional notice period? Answer: If yes, check your collective agreement: if it limits job search hours to the conventional notice period, you are not entitled to them beyond that, unless there is a practice.
  • Question: Can I negotiate additional hours with my employer? Answer: Yes, nothing prevents an individual agreement. You can ask to benefit from hours for the entire notice period, but the employer is not obliged to agree.
  • Question: What if my employer refuses to grant me hours during the statutory notice period? Answer: Bring the case before the industrial tribunal to have a practice or more favourable clause recognised. You can also claim damages for non-compliance with the notice period.
  • Question: What are the time limits for taking action? Answer: You have 12 months from the termination of the employment contract to bring the case before the industrial tribunal.
  • Question: Can a practice be oral? Answer: Yes, but it is more difficult to prove. Gather testimonies, emails, payslips showing the granting of hours.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

Questions fréquentes

Puis-je bénéficier d'heures pour recherche d'emploi pendant tout mon préavis légal ?

Non, sauf si votre convention collective ou un usage dans l'entreprise le prévoit. Sinon, ces heures ne sont dues que pendant le préavis conventionnel.

Que faire si mon employeur ne m'accorde pas ces heures ?

Vous pouvez saisir le conseil de prud'hommes dans les 12 mois suivant la rupture. Rassemblez des preuves d'usage (témoignages, courriels).

Quels sont mes droits si ma convention collective ne mentionne rien ?

Vous n'avez pas de droit automatique. Mais vous pouvez demander à votre employeur de les accorder à titre gracieux, ou invoquer un usage si l'entreprise les accorde habituellement.

Un employeur peut-il refuser ces heures pendant le préavis conventionnel ?

Non, si la convention collective les prévoit, l'employeur doit les accorder. En cas de refus, il peut être condamné à des dommages et intérêts.

Comment prouver un usage dans l'entreprise ?

Par tout moyen : fiches de paie antérieures, attestations d'autres salariés, courriels, notes de service. Un usage doit être constant, général et fixe.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 85-40.581
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 07 mai 1987

Mots-clés

préavisrecherche d'emploiCour de cassationdroit du travailconvention collective

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Employee dismissed in Cannes with 5 years of service

Mr. Dupont, an employee of a service company in Cannes, is dismissed. His collective agreement (proximity services) provides for a conventional notice period of 2 months and job search hours during this notice period. The law also grants him 2 months' notice (identical). Therefore, there is no extension. He benefits from the hours for the entire duration.

Application pratique:

Check that your statutory notice period is not longer than the conventional one. Here, they are equal, so no problem. Consult your collective agreement for the number of hours per day.

2

Employer in Vallauris faced with a request for additional hours

An employer of a printing company in Vallauris receives a request from an employee dismissed with 3 years of service. The collective agreement provides for a notice period of 1 month with job search hours. The law imposes 2 months. The employee claims hours for the 2 months. The employer refuses, relying on the collective agreement.

Application pratique:

The employer must check whether there is a practice in his company of granting these hours for the entire duration. If not, he can legally refuse. It is advisable to formalise the absence of practice in writing.

3

Employee with no applicable collective agreement

Mrs. Martin, a sales representative in Cannes, has no collective agreement. Her contract provides for a notice period of 3 months (in accordance with the law). No clause on job search hours. She asks her employer to grant her 2 hours/day during the notice period. The employer refuses.

Application pratique:

In the absence of a collective agreement or practice, the employer has no obligation. Mrs. Martin can try to negotiate, but has no legal recourse. She must look for a job in her own time.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide