Aller au contenu principal
Unpublished suspensive condition: not enforceable against third parties according to the Court of Cassation
Droit-immobilier

Unpublished suspensive condition: not enforceable against third parties according to the Court of Cassation

📅 Décision du 13 July 2011⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that the deed confirming the fulfilment of a suspensive condition does not need to be registered with the land registry. Failure to register does not render it unenforceable against third parties, unlike other deeds.

Reference decision: cc • No. 10-19.461 • 2011-07-13 • View the decision →

Imagine: you are buying a flat in Bobigny, subject to a suspensive condition of obtaining a loan. You obtain your credit, sign a deed confirming the fulfilment of the condition, but this deed is not registered with the land registry. Later, the seller resells the property to a third party, who becomes the owner. Who is the true owner? This question is asked by hundreds of owners each year. The Court of Cassation, in a judgment of 13 July 2011, ruled: the deed confirming the fulfilment of a suspensive condition does not need to be registered. And above all, its failure to be registered does not render it unenforceable against third parties. But what exactly does that change? Let's break it down.

The facts: a story that happens every day

Mr. X, an owner in Bobigny, sells a plot of land to Mr. Y. The sale is concluded under a suspensive condition: Mr. Y must obtain a planning permission within six months. On 15 March 2005, the permission is granted. A notarial deed confirms the fulfilment of the suspensive condition. But this deed is not registered at the land registry (now the land publicity service). A few months later, Mr. X, who has not been paid, resells the same property to Mr. Z, a buyer from Boulogne-Billancourt. Mr. Z registers his deed of sale. Who is the owner? Mr. Y, who has the first contract, or Mr. Z, who has registered his?

The case comes before the Tribunal de grande instance of Bobigny, then before the Paris Court of Appeal. Mr. Y argues that his deed confirming the fulfilment of the suspensive condition did not need to be registered to be enforceable against third parties, because the decree of 4 January 1955 does not require it. Mr. Z retorts that, for lack of registration, Mr. Y's deed is unenforceable against him. The Court of Appeal rules in favour of Mr. Z. Mr. Y appeals to the Court of Cassation.

The reasoning of the court — dissected

The Court of Cassation quashes the appeal judgment. It recalls that Article 28(1) of Decree No. 55-22 of 4 January 1955 lists the deeds that must be registered to be enforceable against third parties. However, this article does not mention the deed confirming the fulfilment of a suspensive condition. Consequently, in accordance with Article 30 of the same decree, the failure to register such a deed does not result in its unenforceability against third parties. In short, a deed that is not subject to registration does not need to be registered to be enforceable.

Why this distinction? Because land registration aims to inform third parties of real property rights (ownership, mortgages, easements). The suspensive condition is an ancillary element of the sale; its fulfilment does not create a new right, it makes the sale definitive. Therefore, the deed that confirms it does not need to be registered. However, be careful: the deed of sale itself, containing the suspensive condition, must be registered. What few people know is that the Court of Cassation here confirms a consistent solution: only the deeds listed in Article 28 must be registered on pain of unenforceability.

The judges rejected Mr. Z's argument that the deed confirming the fulfilment of the condition would be a deed transferring ownership. No, they say: ownership is transferred by the deed of sale, subject to a suspensive condition. The fulfilment of the condition retroacts to the date of the sale. Therefore, no new transfer.

What this changes for you — concretely

For a seller-owner: if you sell subject to a suspensive condition, ensure that the initial deed of sale is properly registered. The deed confirming the fulfilment of the condition can remain in your files without registration. But beware: if the buyer does not register his deed of sale, you could resell the property to someone else, as in the above case. undefined, I have encountered cases where ill-informed sellers resold a property after the condition was lifted, thinking that the unregistered deed was worthless. Mistake: the initial deed of sale must be registered to be enforceable.

For a buyer: you must require your notary to register the deed of sale (containing the suspensive condition) as soon as it is signed. Once the credit is obtained, the deed confirming the fulfilment of the condition does not need to be registered, but it is prudent to do so to avoid any dispute. If you are in Boulogne-Billancourt and you buy a property worth €300,000, the registration fees are about 0.10% of the price, i.e., €300. That is a small amount to secure your ownership.

For a notary or real estate professional: this decision confirms that you are not required to register the deed confirming the fulfilment of a suspensive condition. But you must always register the initial deed of sale. In case of doubt, register everything: an excess of registration is better than a lack.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Have the deed of sale registered immediately upon signature: even if the suspensive condition has not yet been fulfilled, the deed must be registered to be enforceable against third parties. Without registration, you risk losing your right.
  • Keep the deed confirming the fulfilment of the condition: even if it does not need to be registered, keep it safely. In case of dispute, it proves that the condition has been lifted.
  • Check that your notary has indeed registered the deed: ask him for a copy of the registration certificate. In Bobigny, registration times are about 2 to 3 months. Do not release payment until you have this certificate.
  • If reselling, consult the land register: before buying, check that the seller is indeed the owner. If the previous deed of sale is not registered, the seller might not be the true owner.

This decision is part of consistent case law. Already, in a judgment of 12 May 2004 (No. 02-17.056), the Court of Cassation had held that the deed confirming the fulfilment of a suspensive condition was not subject to registration. The 2011 decision merely confirms this solution. On the other hand, the Court recently recalled that the deed of sale containing the suspensive condition must be registered (Cass. 3rd Civ., 7 March 2019, No. 17-31.517).

The trend is therefore clear: land registration is mandatory for deeds transferring ownership, but not for deeds that merely confirm an ancillary event. This simplifies life for notaries and buyers. However, be wary of suspensive conditions that are not stipulated in the deed of sale but in a separate deed: in that case, that separate deed might need to be registered if it modifies real rights.

Checklist before acting

  1. Have you signed a deed of sale subject to a suspensive condition? Yes → have it registered without delay. No → go to step 2.
  2. Has the suspensive condition been fulfilled? Yes → have a deed confirming the fulfilment drawn up. No need to register it, but keep it.
  3. Has the seller registered his own acquisition deed? Check at the land registry (formerly the mortgage registry). In the Paris region, delays are about 3 months.
  4. Are you uncertain about the enforceability of your right? Consult a lawyer specialized in property law. A 30-minute consultation can save you years of litigation.

In a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce qu'une condition suspensive dans une vente immobilière ?

Une condition suspensive est une clause qui suspend la vente jusqu'à la réalisation d'un événement futur et incertain, comme l'obtention d'un prêt. Si la condition ne se réalise pas, la vente est annulée.

Dois-je publier l'acte constatant la réalisation de la condition suspensive ?

Non, selon la Cour de cassation, cet acte n'a pas à être publié au service de la publicité foncière. Son défaut de publication ne le rend pas inopposable aux tiers.

Que se passe-t-il si l'acte de vente initial n'est pas publié ?

L'acte de vente initial doit être publié pour être opposable aux tiers. Sans publication, le vendeur peut revendre le bien à un autre acquéreur qui publierait son acte, et ce dernier deviendrait propriétaire.

Quels sont les risques si je n'ai pas publié l'acte constatant la réalisation de la condition ?

Aucun risque d'inopposabilité, mais en cas de litige, vous aurez besoin de cet acte pour prouver que la condition est levée. Il est prudent de le conserver et éventuellement de le publier par précaution.

Comment vérifier qu'un acte a été publié ?

Vous pouvez demander un état hypothécaire (ou fichier immobilier) au service de la publicité foncière. Le notaire peut aussi vous fournir une attestation de publication.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 10-19.461
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 13 juillet 2011

Mots-clés

condition suspensivepublicité foncièreinopposabilité aux tiersdécret 55-22Cour de cassationdroit immobiliervente immobilièrenotaire

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Buyer in Bobigny: sale subject to suspensive condition of loan

Mr. Dupont buys a flat in Bobigny for €250,000, subject to obtaining a loan. He obtains his credit and signs a deed confirming the fulfilment of the condition. The initial deed of sale was registered, but not the deed of fulfilment. Later, the seller resells the property to a third party. Who is the owner?

Application pratique:

Thanks to the 2011 decision, Mr. Dupont is protected: his deed of fulfilment did not need to be registered. He remains the owner, because the initial deed of sale was registered. He must nevertheless keep the deed of fulfilment to prove the condition was lifted.

2

Seller in Boulogne-Billancourt: resale after suspensive condition

Mrs. Martin sells her house in Boulogne-Billancourt to Mr. Leroy, subject to a suspensive condition of obtaining planning permission. The permission is obtained, but the deed of fulfilment is not registered. Mrs. Martin, thinking the sale is void, resells the house to Mrs. Dubois, who registers her deed.

Application pratique:

Mrs. Martin made a mistake: the initial deed of sale was registered. Therefore, Mr. Leroy is the owner. Mrs. Dubois will have to bring an action for nullity. The advice: never resell without checking the registration of the initial deed and the reality of the condition.

3

Notary in Paris: obligation to register

A Parisian notary must advise his clients on the registration of deeds. He knows that the deed of sale must be registered, but the deed confirming the fulfilment of a suspensive condition does not. He can therefore reassure his clients and save unnecessary registration costs.

Application pratique:

The notary must nevertheless ensure that the deed of sale is registered promptly. He may also, as a precaution, offer to register the deed of fulfilment if the client wishes, but this is not mandatory.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide